It doesn’t though. These ****s will have no problem 14 months from now, making the exact OPPOSITE ruling against President Warren.
It doesn’t though. These ****s will have no problem 14 months from now, making the exact OPPOSITE ruling against President Warren.
Badgering someone waaaaay smarter than you on camera is a bad idea.
Badgering someone waaaaay smarter than you on camera is a bad idea.
Cue the Jennifer Lawrence nodding head gif.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">The Fake News Media is doing everything possible to belittle my VERY successful trip to London for NATO. I got along great with the NATO leaders, even getting them to pay $130 Billion a year more, & $400 Billion a year more in 3 years. No increase for U.S., only deep respect!</p>— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) <a href="https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1202356032296480768?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">December 4, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
Did anyone else watch Matt Gaetz performance today? The sky isn't falling. It already fell.
I'd like to see the math on those numbers.
Barr is said to disagree with a key finding in the report that the FBI had enough information in July of 2016 to launch the investigation into members of Trump’s campaign, The Post reported Monday. Barr was not “swayed” by Horowitz’s “rationale” in concluding that the FBI had sufficient basis to begin the investigation, sources told the outlet.
The Russia investigation was launched after the FBI learned that then-campaign adviser George Papadopoulos told others that Russia hacked Hillary Clinton’s emails before it was publicly revealed that the Democratic National Committee had been hacked.
The attorney general has argued that other agencies like the CIA could have information that disputes Horowitz’s conclusion, according to The Post. It remains unclear if he plans to make his opinions public.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">A minor child deserves privacy and should be kept out of politics. Pamela Karlan, you should be ashamed of your very angry and obviously biased public pandering, and using a child to do it.</p>— Melania Trump (@FLOTUS) <a href="https://twitter.com/FLOTUS/status/1202344441924571136?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">December 4, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
Kind of shocking that it was the female witness yesterday that used Barron as a prop to make a point and then apologized later. The sanctimony on the right about it is rich but they'll make a lot of hay on it. Any time a Democrat does that it's wrong, every time someone on the right does it it's right. Pretty interesting dynamic. The conversations I have had already today confirm exactly that.
I think the outrage over this is stupid, but unlike the republicans she apologized