French Rage
NICKERSON HAS [CENSORED]
Hey now, Chuck also has the Nats WS title going for him. That was one of the best days of his life.
USCHO Fan Forum
This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
-
The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.
POTUS 46.10: A New Hope
- Thread starter jericho
- Start date
- Status
Hey now, Chuck also has the Nats WS title going for him. That was one of the best days of his life.
ScoobyDoo
NPC
Baby Huey apparently can't read. It's all covered in the indictment. An indictment that consists entirely of testimony from Republicans HIRED by the defendant.
Apparently the Wall Street Journal Editorial Board can't read the indictment either.
And after Lindsey Graham's incessant whining again last night about how horrible the judicial system of the United States is I am now convinced that yes, Republicans DO IN FACT want to destroy the country. Democrats are willing to concede when they lose. Democrats are willing to accept a rogue Supreme Court and work to change it.
Republicans? Desantis is now quoted as saying that DAY ONE IN OFFICE HE WILL SLIT THE THROATS OF THE DEEP STATE.
https://www.newsweek.com/ron-desantis-vows-start-slitting-throats-first-day-presidency-1817183
Oh, and I suggest everyone listen to the concession speeches of Al Gore and Hillary Clinton again. Listen closely. You can actually hear the difference.
MichVandal
Well-known member
Another comic, chucky? Good one, but, again, projection. All of the grifting that your worship got from you finally tiring? You’ve been fleeced for 7 years now, so maybe it’s getting noticed?
Or are you thinking about all of your worships clan that made huge money during the last 7 years? Including the fact that your worship made money from his hotels from other countries, which is not only illegal, but unconstitutional. For a law and order guy, you don’t know that?
Maybe try reading real documents, someday. I know reading more than one line in a cartoon is hard, but you can at least try.
Or are you thinking about all of your worships clan that made huge money during the last 7 years? Including the fact that your worship made money from his hotels from other countries, which is not only illegal, but unconstitutional. For a law and order guy, you don’t know that?
Maybe try reading real documents, someday. I know reading more than one line in a cartoon is hard, but you can at least try.
ScoobyDoo
NPC
More good news for Chucky. Trump is going to make lemonade out of his court battle in DC and use it to argue that the 2020 election was stolen.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2023/08/03/donald-trump-charges-election-republicans/
It was only argued like 63 times already in courts all over the United States and got nowhere. It's got to work now.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2023/08/03/donald-trump-charges-election-republicans/
It was only argued like 63 times already in courts all over the United States and got nowhere. It's got to work now.
Chuck Murray
WIS & Effingwoods Hockey Almanac
None of 'em ever stopped complaining, and all four vacated of their own volition without eviction proceedings.
Nice try, dumba$$
TalonsUpPuckDown
Roll along you BG Warriors!
Given the cartoons that have recently been posted, this tweet resonated with me.
https://rb.gy/rqcx5
https://rb.gy/rqcx5
Chuck Murray
WIS & Effingwoods Hockey Almanac
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2023/08/04/two_sets_of_laws_for_two_americas_149580.html
Two sets of laws now operate in an increasingly unrecognizable America.
Consider the matter of unlawfully removing and storing classified papers.
Donald Trump may go to prison for removing contested White House files to his home.
So far, Joe Biden seems exempt from just such legal jeopardy.
But as a senator and vice president with no right, as does a president, to declassify files, Biden removed and, as a private citizen, kept for years classified files in unsecured locations.
Biden's team strangely revealed the unlawful removals after years of silence.
It did so because the Biden administration found itself in the untenable position of prosecuting the former president for "crimes" that the current president committed as well -- albeit far earlier and longer.
Impeachable phone calls?
Donald Trump was impeached by a Democratic House for delaying foreign aid until the Ukrainian government guaranteed that Hunter Biden and his family were no longer engaged in corrupt influence peddling in Kyiv.
In addition, the Left charged that Trump was targeting Joe Biden, his possible 2020 rival.
Yet Biden, with impunity, bragged that he had fired a Ukrainian prosecutor looking into his own son's schemes by promising to cancel outright American foreign aid.
And the Biden administration's Justice Department is now targeting Trump, currently the front-running challenger to Biden in 2024.
Election denialism?
Trump was indicted by Special Counsel Jack Smith, in part for supposedly conspiratorially "unlawfully discounting legitimate votes."
Will Smith then also indict Stacey Abrams? For years Abrams falsely claimed that she was the real governor of Georgia. She toured the country in hopes of "discounting" the state vote count.
Or maybe Smith was referring to the conspiracist and former president Jimmy Carter.
He alleged that Trump in 2016 "lost the election, and he was put into office because the Russians interfered on his behalf."
Will Smith charge Hillary Clinton?
She serially libeled Trump as an "illegitimate" president.
Clinton hatched the Russian collusion hoax, and bragged she joined the "Resistance" to continue her attacks on an elected president.
Or maybe Smith meant the Hollywood crowd.
Lots of actors cut commercials after the 2016 election -- begging viewers to pressure the electors to ignore their constitutional duties to honor their states' popular vote and instead swing their ballots to Hillary Clinton?
Was not that "insurrectionary?"
Or was Smith thinking of January 2005?
Then 32 Democratic House members and Sen. Barbara Boxer tried to nullify the legally certified vote in Ohio -- to thereby elect the loser John Kerry.
How about destroying evidence?
Trump was also indicted for allegedly attempting to erase video material from his own security cameras in his own house.
Yet Hillary Clinton with impunity eliminated subpoenaed communication devices and thousands of emails.
Violations of security? Trump was indicted for supposedly loosely talking about classified material to visitors at his home.
So, will prosecutor Smith's indictments also extend to Hillary Clinton? She sent classified documents illegally over her unsecured private server.
FBI Director James Comey memorialized a confidential president conversation.
Then he deliberately leaked what properly was a classified document to the media. It was all part of Comey's Machiavellian gambit to prompt the appointment of a favorable special prosecutor.
What about subversion of the electoral process?
Donald Trump was indicted for supposedly undermining the election of 2020 by questioning the integrity of the balloting.
In 2016, Hillary Clinton's campaign illegally hired two foreign nationals Christopher Steele and Igor Danchenko to compile falsehoods about her opponent Trump.
Clinton hid her payments behind three paywalls.
Her team, along with the FBI, helped leak the counterfeit dossier to the media and high officials to undermine her opponent -- and thus subvert the election itself.
Lying and perjury?
Two Trump aides and Trump himself are indicted for supposedly stonewalling federal investigators by claiming either amnesia or ignorance.
That tact is exactly what James Comey did 245 times while under oath before Congress.
What do former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, former Director of the CIA John Brennan, and former interim FBI Director Andrew McCabe all have in common?
All three admitted they flagrantly lied either under oath to Congress or to federal investigators.
The three were never indicted for their false and perjurious testimonies.
We have now serially devolved from the 2016 election "Russian collusion" hoax, to the 2020 election "Russian disinformation" laptop hoax, and down to the 2024 election weaponized indictments.
Out of pathological hatred or fear of Donald Trump, the Left has crafted one set of laws for themselves, and another for all other Americans.
They smugly believe their own moral superiority grants them such a right to apply laws unequally -- or to ignore them altogether.
To retain power at all cost, and to destroy a political rival, left-wing Democrats are systematically dismantling the constitutional foundations of the United States as we once knew them.
Two sets of laws now operate in an increasingly unrecognizable America.
Consider the matter of unlawfully removing and storing classified papers.
Donald Trump may go to prison for removing contested White House files to his home.
So far, Joe Biden seems exempt from just such legal jeopardy.
But as a senator and vice president with no right, as does a president, to declassify files, Biden removed and, as a private citizen, kept for years classified files in unsecured locations.
Biden's team strangely revealed the unlawful removals after years of silence.
It did so because the Biden administration found itself in the untenable position of prosecuting the former president for "crimes" that the current president committed as well -- albeit far earlier and longer.
Impeachable phone calls?
Donald Trump was impeached by a Democratic House for delaying foreign aid until the Ukrainian government guaranteed that Hunter Biden and his family were no longer engaged in corrupt influence peddling in Kyiv.
In addition, the Left charged that Trump was targeting Joe Biden, his possible 2020 rival.
Yet Biden, with impunity, bragged that he had fired a Ukrainian prosecutor looking into his own son's schemes by promising to cancel outright American foreign aid.
And the Biden administration's Justice Department is now targeting Trump, currently the front-running challenger to Biden in 2024.
Election denialism?
Trump was indicted by Special Counsel Jack Smith, in part for supposedly conspiratorially "unlawfully discounting legitimate votes."
Will Smith then also indict Stacey Abrams? For years Abrams falsely claimed that she was the real governor of Georgia. She toured the country in hopes of "discounting" the state vote count.
Or maybe Smith was referring to the conspiracist and former president Jimmy Carter.
He alleged that Trump in 2016 "lost the election, and he was put into office because the Russians interfered on his behalf."
Will Smith charge Hillary Clinton?
She serially libeled Trump as an "illegitimate" president.
Clinton hatched the Russian collusion hoax, and bragged she joined the "Resistance" to continue her attacks on an elected president.
Or maybe Smith meant the Hollywood crowd.
Lots of actors cut commercials after the 2016 election -- begging viewers to pressure the electors to ignore their constitutional duties to honor their states' popular vote and instead swing their ballots to Hillary Clinton?
Was not that "insurrectionary?"
Or was Smith thinking of January 2005?
Then 32 Democratic House members and Sen. Barbara Boxer tried to nullify the legally certified vote in Ohio -- to thereby elect the loser John Kerry.
How about destroying evidence?
Trump was also indicted for allegedly attempting to erase video material from his own security cameras in his own house.
Yet Hillary Clinton with impunity eliminated subpoenaed communication devices and thousands of emails.
Violations of security? Trump was indicted for supposedly loosely talking about classified material to visitors at his home.
So, will prosecutor Smith's indictments also extend to Hillary Clinton? She sent classified documents illegally over her unsecured private server.
FBI Director James Comey memorialized a confidential president conversation.
Then he deliberately leaked what properly was a classified document to the media. It was all part of Comey's Machiavellian gambit to prompt the appointment of a favorable special prosecutor.
What about subversion of the electoral process?
Donald Trump was indicted for supposedly undermining the election of 2020 by questioning the integrity of the balloting.
In 2016, Hillary Clinton's campaign illegally hired two foreign nationals Christopher Steele and Igor Danchenko to compile falsehoods about her opponent Trump.
Clinton hid her payments behind three paywalls.
Her team, along with the FBI, helped leak the counterfeit dossier to the media and high officials to undermine her opponent -- and thus subvert the election itself.
Lying and perjury?
Two Trump aides and Trump himself are indicted for supposedly stonewalling federal investigators by claiming either amnesia or ignorance.
That tact is exactly what James Comey did 245 times while under oath before Congress.
What do former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, former Director of the CIA John Brennan, and former interim FBI Director Andrew McCabe all have in common?
All three admitted they flagrantly lied either under oath to Congress or to federal investigators.
The three were never indicted for their false and perjurious testimonies.
We have now serially devolved from the 2016 election "Russian collusion" hoax, to the 2020 election "Russian disinformation" laptop hoax, and down to the 2024 election weaponized indictments.
Out of pathological hatred or fear of Donald Trump, the Left has crafted one set of laws for themselves, and another for all other Americans.
They smugly believe their own moral superiority grants them such a right to apply laws unequally -- or to ignore them altogether.
To retain power at all cost, and to destroy a political rival, left-wing Democrats are systematically dismantling the constitutional foundations of the United States as we once knew them.
Slap Shot
I got nothing
aparch
Well-known member
French Rage
NICKERSON HAS [CENSORED]
Dammit guys, he's right. I can't believe we were so stupid. Why did Jack Smith just bring a single charge of not vacating the White House, when it was so easily disprovable?!
Ooooooooooh waaaaaaaaaaaaaaait.
Ooooooooooh waaaaaaaaaaaaaaait.
French Rage
NICKERSON HAS [CENSORED]
Oh and I will vacate the premises by my own volition after the crime is complete. That's like, double-super not a crime then!
ScoobyDoo
NPC
God, you're dumb. Like really dumb.
Chuck Murray
WIS & Effingwoods Hockey Almanac
One of the two of us voted for a demented senile compromised serial liar who's owned lock stock & barrel by China.
That would be you.
Chuck Murray
WIS & Effingwoods Hockey Almanac
So when do you folks think they'll be giving their "awards" back for this crack (addled) "journalism"?
Chuck Murray
WIS & Effingwoods Hockey Almanac
WeAreNDHockey
\../ \../
Was that political cartoon posted by some brain-dead jagoff that I had actually forgotten that I have on "ignore" drawn by a cartoonist that is even remotely mainstream? I ask because -- and maybe I'm forgetting something -- I do not recall Gore, Kerry or Clinton every saying their elections were stolen. Sure, recounts were considered, and in Gore's case undertaken until nakedly political judicial forces intervened, but did any of them ever publicly say (or even in private conversations that have since been credibly revealed) their elections were stolen?
I'm not even sure if in the moment Clinton even questioned the fairness or usefullness of the electoral college, which is something republicans were doing in full force leading up to the 2000 elections because polls were indicating there was a chance the reverse of what actually happened might happen. Kerry and Clinton also conceded less than 24 hours after polls closed (taking as much time as a number of other presidential elections in my lifetime, so nothing to see in them not pulling a Carter and condeding hours before the polls closed in more than one state). Gore may have questioned the construction of the physical ballots in Florida (lots of people did) and whether or not that played a part in people actually casting ballots for Bush when they intended a vote for him, but that isn't necessarily theft.
Seriously, if any of them claimed elections were stolen, share a link to a credible story, because I do not recall any of them doing so.
I'm not even sure if in the moment Clinton even questioned the fairness or usefullness of the electoral college, which is something republicans were doing in full force leading up to the 2000 elections because polls were indicating there was a chance the reverse of what actually happened might happen. Kerry and Clinton also conceded less than 24 hours after polls closed (taking as much time as a number of other presidential elections in my lifetime, so nothing to see in them not pulling a Carter and condeding hours before the polls closed in more than one state). Gore may have questioned the construction of the physical ballots in Florida (lots of people did) and whether or not that played a part in people actually casting ballots for Bush when they intended a vote for him, but that isn't necessarily theft.
Seriously, if any of them claimed elections were stolen, share a link to a credible story, because I do not recall any of them doing so.
ScoobyDoo
NPC
Now you're just fucking stupid.
Slap Shot
I got nothing
You just made his point for him, Baby Huey.
RaceBoarder
Waiting for the Snow to fly...
So that senile, demented, serial liar is the one who is head of the Biden Crime Family? And R's can't get him in jail?
That seems kind of like a mission failure on their part then...
- Status