What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

POTUS 45.63: This Thread Gets Better Ratings Than The Super Bowl

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: POTUS 45.63: This Thread Gets Better Ratings Than The Super Bowl

I hope she’s drunk again.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Will be interviewed by <a href="https://twitter.com/JudgeJeanine?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@JudgeJeanine</a> tonight at 9:00 P.M. Eastern on <a href="https://twitter.com/FoxNews?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@FoxNews</a>! <a href="https://t.co/F83yVaxXab">https://t.co/F83yVaxXab</a></p>— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) <a href="https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1249123053180723200?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 11, 2020</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
Re: POTUS 45.63: This Thread Gets Better Ratings Than The Super Bowl

Because of course he did...

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Trump threatened to veto coronavirus stimulus package if it contained bailout money for USPS: report<a href="https://t.co/SQNYWCm78L">https://t.co/SQNYWCm78L</a> <a href="https://t.co/KPgZ9FpLWK">pic.twitter.com/KPgZ9FpLWK</a></p>— The Hill (@thehill) <a href="https://twitter.com/thehill/status/1249137420785901568?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 12, 2020</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
Re: POTUS 45.63: This Thread Gets Better Ratings Than The Super Bowl

Holy ****ing ****. It’s an essential government service. How can we just let it die?
 
Holy ****ing ****. It’s an essential government service. How can we just let it die?

Republicans HATE it. The pension funding years ago was just the beginning.

And he thinks it means no voting by mail in Nov
 
Republicans HATE it. The pension funding years ago was just the beginning.

And he thinks it means no voting by mail in Nov
My theory is that Republicans hate it because its existence (along with Article I, Section 8, Clause 7) proves that the founding fathers allowed for the possibility that it could be okay to nationalize some industries. It’s a very inconvenient example that Democratic Socialists can always throw in their faces. Not that I would ever do such a thing, mind you....
 
My theory is that Republicans hate it because its existence (along with Article I, Section 8, Clause 7) proves that the founding fathers allowed for the possibility that it could be okay to nationalize some industries. It’s a very inconvenient example that Democratic Socialists can always throw in their faces. Not that I would ever do such a thing, mind you....

Wait til a rural dumpie can’t send out mailers for “MAH SMALL BIZNUS”
 
My theory is that Republicans hate it because its existence (along with Article I, Section 8, Clause 7) proves that the founding fathers allowed for the possibility that it could be okay to nationalize some industries. It’s a very inconvenient example that Democratic Socialists can always throw in their faces. Not that I would ever do such a thing, mind you....
Were there any others they specifically nationalized in the constitution?
 
Re: POTUS 45.63: This Thread Gets Better Ratings Than The Super Bowl

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">I finally read the NY Times article that refused to say in its headline that William Barr lied. The number of times they talk about how he lies without using the word "lie" is staggering. I screenshotted all of them. It's gonna take a few tweets 1/ <a href="https://t.co/3Pd8Lsryey">pic.twitter.com/3Pd8Lsryey</a></p>— Ken Tremendous (@KenTremendous) <a href="https://twitter.com/KenTremendous/status/1249113575118876673?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 11, 2020</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
Re: POTUS 45.63: This Thread Gets Better Ratings Than The Super Bowl

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">I finally read the NY Times article that refused to say in its headline that William Barr lied. The number of times they talk about how he lies without using the word "lie" is staggering. I screenshotted all of them. It's gonna take a few tweets 1/ <a href="https://t.co/3Pd8Lsryey">pic.twitter.com/3Pd8Lsryey</a></p>— Ken Tremendous (@KenTremendous) <a href="https://twitter.com/KenTremendous/status/1249113575118876673?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 11, 2020</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

If we actually used the words "lie" or "lies" when talking about trump or one of the minions in his cabinet it would be used so often it would devalue the very meaning of it.
 
Re: POTUS 45.63: This Thread Gets Better Ratings Than The Super Bowl

If we actually used the words "lie" or "lies" when talking about trump or one of the minions in his cabinet it would be used so often it would devalue the very meaning of it.

By "it," do you mean the word "lies," or dump's lying?

Don't we devalue the meaning of the word when we confuse its use with euphemisms?
 
Re: POTUS 45.63: This Thread Gets Better Ratings Than The Super Bowl

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Maybe should have left this one in the Drafts folder.<a href="https://t.co/rsLdRrvihA">https://t.co/rsLdRrvihA</a></p>— Gary Legum (@GaryLegum) <a href="https://twitter.com/GaryLegum/status/1249420109921337345?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 12, 2020</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
Re: POTUS 45.63: This Thread Gets Better Ratings Than The Super Bowl

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Maybe should have left this one in the Drafts folder.<a href="https://t.co/rsLdRrvihA">https://t.co/rsLdRrvihA</a></p>— Gary Legum (@GaryLegum) <a href="https://twitter.com/GaryLegum/status/1249420109921337345?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 12, 2020</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Omg. That’s so bad.

Also, the invisible enemy is what China called this, right? God they can’t even do authoritarian without being a 2nd rare copy
 
Re: POTUS 45.63: This Thread Gets Better Ratings Than The Super Bowl

God they can’t even do authoritarian without being a 2nd rate copy

"You know how when you make a copy of a copy, it's not as sharp as... well... the original?"

<img src=https://media1.tenor.com/images/2b7163214e1220855072ba657b302a79/tenor.gif>
 
Re: POTUS 45.63: This Thread Gets Better Ratings Than The Super Bowl

Omg. That’s so bad.

Also, the invisible enemy is what China called this, right? God they can’t even do authoritarian without being a 2nd rare copy

With Dump I just think of the Invisible Empire.

<img src="https://imperialglobalexeter.files.wordpress.com/2014/07/kkkmembershipcard.png" >
 
Re: POTUS 45.63: This Thread Gets Better Ratings Than The Super Bowl

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Thanks Obama &#55357;&#56865; <a href="https://t.co/bXj5qYePzz">pic.twitter.com/bXj5qYePzz</a></p>— T. Greg Doucette (@greg_doucette) <a href="https://twitter.com/greg_doucette/status/1249385722240524288?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 12, 2020</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
Re: POTUS 45.63: This Thread Gets Better Ratings Than The Super Bowl

But you know, it's not really invisible. I mean, yeah, it is, here....now

But if you had instituted testing back in January, and tracking and isolation, we'd know exactly where it was. we'd be able to see it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top