MinnesotaNorthStar
Minding the gap
Obama and Hilary conspired to hide them.
USCHO Fan Forum
This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
-
The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.
POTUS 45.57: We Should Have Voted for Zaphod Beeblebrox Instead.
- Thread starter MissThundercat
- Start date
- Status
Obama and Hilary conspired to hide them.
aparch
Acetaminamerican
I'm really surprised someone hasn't made one yet. Seems easy enough if you use Fox and Friends as the trigger to generate random phrases.
Kepler
Si certus es dubita
Re: POTUS 45.57: We Should Have Voted for Zaphod Beeblebrox Instead.
Please get rid of the executive pardon already.
Please get rid of the executive pardon already.
French Rage
NICKERSON HAS [CENSORED]
Re: POTUS 45.57: We Should Have Voted for Zaphod Beeblebrox Instead.
500 miles in roughly 500 days, so I'm assuming one of the laws he wants broken is "of physics".
500 miles in roughly 500 days, so I'm assuming one of the laws he wants broken is "of physics".
Kepler
Si certus es dubita
Re: POTUS 45.57: We Should Have Voted for Zaphod Beeblebrox Instead.
I'm certain Dumpy thinks he has the power to pardon violations of temporal-physical laws.
I'm certain Dumpy thinks he has the power to pardon violations of temporal-physical laws.
Handyman
Hug someone you care about...
Re: POTUS 45.57: We Should Have Voted for Zaphod Beeblebrox Instead.
I said that in 2017. The Iron Range proved it when they went for Trump. (and still do) They know he is full of it, they know he cant fix their problems and really has no inclination to do so. They would rather he pretend to do it then be told the truth that they need to wake up and move into the 21st Century.
I said that in 2017. The Iron Range proved it when they went for Trump. (and still do) They know he is full of it, they know he cant fix their problems and really has no inclination to do so. They would rather he pretend to do it then be told the truth that they need to wake up and move into the 21st Century.
Kepler
Si certus es dubita
Re: POTUS 45.57: We Should Have Voted for Zaphod Beeblebrox Instead.
You've seen the confederate flags, right? They need to work on entering the 20th, first.
You've seen the confederate flags, right? They need to work on entering the 20th, first.
Handyman
Hug someone you care about...
Re: POTUS 45.57: We Should Have Voted for Zaphod Beeblebrox Instead.
I saw a story where in Minnesota, which according to many a genius is "in play", his support since 2016 has dropped 18 percent. That is an epic drop seeing as he only lost by like 2% to Hillary.
I saw a story where in Minnesota, which according to many a genius is "in play", his support since 2016 has dropped 18 percent. That is an epic drop seeing as he only lost by like 2% to Hillary.
Handyman
Hug someone you care about...
Re: POTUS 45.57: We Should Have Voted for Zaphod Beeblebrox Instead.
Confederate Flags arent very big in Northern Minnesota
(The Iron Range)
Confederate Flags arent very big in Northern Minnesota
(The Iron Range)
Kepler
Si certus es dubita
Re: POTUS 45.57: We Should Have Voted for Zaphod Beeblebrox Instead.
I'm quite surprised.
One of the sillier/more pathetic things about Dumpies and other low income/low intelligence conservatives is their adoption of the confederate flag even though they aren't southern, as an "own the libs" tantrum thing. Used to see them all over Western NY, Central PA, and Eastern OR.
Basically wherever you see Republicans --> racists --> racist totems.
Confederate Flags arent very big in Northern Minnesota
I'm quite surprised.
One of the sillier/more pathetic things about Dumpies and other low income/low intelligence conservatives is their adoption of the confederate flag even though they aren't southern, as an "own the libs" tantrum thing. Used to see them all over Western NY, Central PA, and Eastern OR.
Basically wherever you see Republicans --> racists --> racist totems.
bronconick
Yep, still here
Re: POTUS 45.57: We Should Have Voted for Zaphod Beeblebrox Instead.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">USCIS confirms: As of October 29, children born to U.S. service members outside of the U.S. will no longer be automatically considered citizens.<br><br>Their parents will have to apply for citizenship on their behalf. <a href="https://t.co/beDHdMgqSM">https://t.co/beDHdMgqSM</a></p>— Haley Britzky (@halbritz) <a href="https://twitter.com/halbritz/status/1166800554699427841?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">August 28, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">USCIS confirms: As of October 29, children born to U.S. service members outside of the U.S. will no longer be automatically considered citizens.<br><br>Their parents will have to apply for citizenship on their behalf. <a href="https://t.co/beDHdMgqSM">https://t.co/beDHdMgqSM</a></p>— Haley Britzky (@halbritz) <a href="https://twitter.com/halbritz/status/1166800554699427841?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">August 28, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
D
Deutsche Gopher Fan
Guest
Re: POTUS 45.57: We Should Have Voted for Zaphod Beeblebrox Instead.
Yeah, what a nice FU to servicemen.
Yeah, what a nice FU to servicemen.
dxmnkd316
Lucia Apologist
Re: POTUS 45.57: We Should Have Voted for Zaphod Beeblebrox Instead.
There is no way this is legal, right? Unless, I assume, the headline excluded the part where it's non-US citizens who are in the armed forces and have their kids overseas. Right?
There is no way this is legal, right? Unless, I assume, the headline excluded the part where it's non-US citizens who are in the armed forces and have their kids overseas. Right?
dxmnkd316
Lucia Apologist
Re: POTUS 45.57: We Should Have Voted for Zaphod Beeblebrox Instead.
Ok, it seems this headline is being deceptive or it's really poorly written.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Correction: Experts who have looked at new USCIS policy say it applies if a service member adopts a child overseas, but children born to service members on deployment would still automatically get citizenship. I deleted tweets with the incorrect info. <a href="https://t.co/xeu8I3zrkJ">https://t.co/xeu8I3zrkJ</a></p>— Ken Dilanian (@KenDilanianNBC) <a href="https://twitter.com/KenDilanianNBC/status/1166819546789023745?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">August 28, 2019</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
Further clarified here:
https://www.uscis.gov/news/fact-sheets/uscis-policy-manual-update
They're still guaranteed the right to be citizens if they're born to a US citizen, they just can't use the overseas residence as a "US location". There used to be two ways to acquire citizenship, this basically requires you to do one and eliminates the second.
Ok, it seems this headline is being deceptive or it's really poorly written.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Correction: Experts who have looked at new USCIS policy say it applies if a service member adopts a child overseas, but children born to service members on deployment would still automatically get citizenship. I deleted tweets with the incorrect info. <a href="https://t.co/xeu8I3zrkJ">https://t.co/xeu8I3zrkJ</a></p>— Ken Dilanian (@KenDilanianNBC) <a href="https://twitter.com/KenDilanianNBC/status/1166819546789023745?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">August 28, 2019</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
Further clarified here:
https://www.uscis.gov/news/fact-sheets/uscis-policy-manual-update
They're still guaranteed the right to be citizens if they're born to a US citizen, they just can't use the overseas residence as a "US location". There used to be two ways to acquire citizenship, this basically requires you to do one and eliminates the second.
Last edited:
aparch
Acetaminamerican
Re: POTUS 45.57: We Should Have Voted for Zaphod Beeblebrox Instead.
Children born to armed service members potentially are granted citizenship, but they must still take the oath.
US Government employees (Embassy, State Department, Etc.) are NOT granted that, and must petition for their children to be naturalized, and must obtain an immigrant Visa to enter the US to take the oath.
At least according to this article:
https://www.businessinsider.com/tru...verseas-dont-get-automatic-citizenship-2019-8
Children born to armed service members potentially are granted citizenship, but they must still take the oath.
US Government employees (Embassy, State Department, Etc.) are NOT granted that, and must petition for their children to be naturalized, and must obtain an immigrant Visa to enter the US to take the oath.
At least according to this article:
https://www.businessinsider.com/tru...verseas-dont-get-automatic-citizenship-2019-8
- Status