What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

POTUS 45:55: Wow, @CNN RATINGS HAVE CRASHED. LOST ALL CREDIBILITY!

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: POTUS 45:55: Wow, @CNN RATINGS HAVE CRASHED. LOST ALL CREDIBILITY!

How do you have a reasonable conversation with someone who thinks giving soap and toothpaste to children locked in cages is a bridge too far?

You don't. And I'm not of that crowd. Some think I am. Some think others are. However, they refuse to even think about having a convo unless you are lock and step with them, and that's simply ridiculous. I'm not in the uber left crowd. That does not make me MAGA. It's not an either/or, and that is what frustrates me.
 
*whispers* Reganomics was a "far right" move for the GOP where just a decade earlier even Nixon campaigned for guaranteed minimum incomes as a form of welfare reform. Today, Nixon would be sitting somewhere between Warren and Bernie.

Nixon also wanted open relations with Mao, a dictator who killed tens of millions and oppressed hundreds of millions more. What a d@mn commie! No wonder he turned out to be a crook. :D
 
Re: POTUS 45:55: Wow, @CNN RATINGS HAVE CRASHED. LOST ALL CREDIBILITY!

Nixon also wanted open relations with Mao, a dictator who killed tens of millions and oppressed hundreds of millions more. What a d@mn commie! No wonder he turned out to be a crook. :D

Follow the US dollar. That is your answer every time. ;)
 
Re: POTUS 45:55: Wow, @CNN RATINGS HAVE CRASHED. LOST ALL CREDIBILITY!

Nixon also wanted open relations with Mao, a dictator who killed tens of millions and oppressed hundreds of millions more. What a d@mn commie! No wonder he turned out to be a crook. :D

So then... Tulsi Gabbard is Nixon 2.0?
 
Re: POTUS 45:55: Wow, @CNN RATINGS HAVE CRASHED. LOST ALL CREDIBILITY!

Right now, my honest opinion, is that if you don't follow the AOC/Bernie, maybe Warren approach, you are a MAGA, and that's not even close to the truth. The uber left, much like the uber right, is basically saying "our way or the highway, period." That's bullsh*. That is what is dividing our country in the first place.
This link is related, and does extend to social media, also:
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DhluYX6VAAApWoM.jpg

You may feel that way, but not many others do.
 
Re: POTUS 45:55: Wow, @CNN RATINGS HAVE CRASHED. LOST ALL CREDIBILITY!

I can only speak for myself.

I must have misunderstood then, because it seemed to me you were speaking for others--that they think if you don't support Bernie/AOC you are MAGA.
 
Re: POTUS 45:55: Wow, @CNN RATINGS HAVE CRASHED. LOST ALL CREDIBILITY!

I must have misunderstood then, because it seemed to me you were speaking for others--that they think if you don't support Bernie/AOC you are MAGA.

That is on me, not making myself clear, so I apologize in that case. That is the attitude I am getting.
 
Re: POTUS 45:55: Wow, @CNN RATINGS HAVE CRASHED. LOST ALL CREDIBILITY!

That is on me, not making myself clear, so I apologize in that case. That is the attitude I am getting.

You have noting to apologize for. I'm tired, and it shows.
 
Re: POTUS 45:55: Wow, @CNN RATINGS HAVE CRASHED. LOST ALL CREDIBILITY!

Poppycock. The extremes are not the same as far their level of influence. Also as you approach moving further and further left the motivation at that level is to help as many people as possible. As you go further right the intent is to help as few people as possible.

Also what "extreme left" initiatives are "destroying this country?" What examples of upcoming Democratic leaders are pushing law that is going to "destroy the country"?

If you want to say the furthest outer reaches of the left (ALF, ANTIFA or the like perhaps) are "just as bad" I won't argue with you. The problem is that % of the left is outnumbered 10x by the number of far right loonies so your "both sides" mantra holds no water. Just get off it because no one is buying it, and not because we don't understand but because we fully understand.

Those who want to go full left, the antifa, don't understand you have to win the seats first. So, go moderate, get your seat, then lay down the hammer. You go full throttle from the start, you will not get the votes you need to swing.

As far as extreme left destroying the country? That free college tuition? You're already seeing even liberals going ***. Those who have paid off their loans and all of a sudden this next wave gets it free? Gotta get mine (and in this case, I don't blame 'em).

Give me people that are willing to talk, willing to compromise, willing to sit at the table, hammer something out. It will NOT be the best for everyone, but it will hopefully be the best of both worlds, so to speak.

Edit: call me a romantic, a hopeful, this situation may be impossible, but I will carry this torch until I die.
 
Re: POTUS 45:55: Wow, @CNN RATINGS HAVE CRASHED. LOST ALL CREDIBILITY!

Reposting due to a few edits:

Extreme right? Extreme left? Which is it?

Huh, both are saying that same thing.

I am not far left, though. Extremism is destroying this country, and I will not be a part of that extremism, right or left. I will stand by what I believe is truest to me, while voting the same way (with some variance, since no candidate is perfect), and so be it. I will not be cowed into a corner, as rufus/trix are trying to do by calling me out with their bullsh*.

Poppycock. The extremes are not the same as far their level of influence. Also as you approach moving further and further left the motivation at that level is to help as many people as possible. As you go further right the intent is to help as few people as possible.

Also what "extreme left" initiatives are "destroying this country?" What examples of upcoming Democratic leaders are pushing law that is going to "destroy the country"?

If you want to say the furthest outer reaches of the left (ALF, ANTIFA or the like perhaps) are "just as bad" I won't argue with you. The problem is that % of the left is outnumbered 10x by the number of far right loonies so your "both sides" mantra holds no water. Just get off it because no one is buying it, and not because we don't understand but because we fully understand.

That is on me, not making myself clear, so I apologize in that case. That is the attitude I am getting.

Burd he is clarifying what you're saying. He thinks if he doesn't fall in love with Bernie/AOC that others here then accuse of being MAGA.

If anyone thinks he's MAGA it's because of my first response and for his insistence to continually equate, "both sides". It's a valid observation on their part.

Brent - discussing free tuition is destroying nothing. And btw there are plenty of initiatives out there that discuss addressing tuition without taking it to being completely free. The people "destroying" us are those that have a tantrum over AOC's initiatives.

Give me people that want to talk

What the eff? She wants to start a dialogue, it's MAGA want to silence her completely. Sorry again your narrative that the left is equally as dangerous is full of crap. You also failed to address the fact that the far, far right has a much larger footprint in Washington than the far left.
 
Re: POTUS 45:55: Wow, @CNN RATINGS HAVE CRASHED. LOST ALL CREDIBILITY!

AOC is tossing bombs in general, even DX, who is very opposite of me politically, has said so. She needs to rein it in. I also find it funny that some fall back on "both sides" argument, even when it holds truth, yet they refuse to admit it. Guess what? It's true. Both sides perform shady tactics and stances. Deal with it. I have never claimed one is better than the other, I have only stated that both sides are guilty of it.
 
Re: POTUS 45:55: Wow, @CNN RATINGS HAVE CRASHED. LOST ALL CREDIBILITY!

Ok you refuse to listen to reason so I'll bow out.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top