Re: POTUS 45:53: I Didn't Appoint That Judge So It Doesn't Matter.
This is a bit extreme. My understanding is that all of his testimony would be made public. Get him in there, under oath, to tell what he knows. If you need to call him back later, do so. I'm less interested in a public spectacle at this point and more interested in what criminal charges there are to nail Chump on.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-cards="hidden" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">JUST IN: Nadler: Mueller wants to testify privately <a href="https://t.co/mDdmUH1hXX">https://t.co/mDdmUH1hXX</a> <a href="https://t.co/s44OlWyz1r">pic.twitter.com/s44OlWyz1r</a></p>— The Hill (@thehill) <a href="https://twitter.com/thehill/status/1131758481097351169?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">May 24, 2019</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
In private? Worthless...
Sorry I know people love to defend Mueller but if he has something to say the people need to know what it is. Things are teetering and he might be the only person who can connect all the dots for us. Testifying privately means he might as well not testify at all.
This is a bit extreme. My understanding is that all of his testimony would be made public. Get him in there, under oath, to tell what he knows. If you need to call him back later, do so. I'm less interested in a public spectacle at this point and more interested in what criminal charges there are to nail Chump on.