D
Deutsche Gopher Fan
Guest
Re: POTUS 45:52: Not Founded On Anything
I don’t think Rufus was referring to duper with his hysterical comment
I don’t think Rufus was referring to duper with his hysterical comment
I never said you're being hysterical. Don't put words in my fingertips.
I said that there are many, MANY things that he can legit be called out on, like Chinese steel for example. But every time you use a false example, like Chinese MAGA hats (I'm sure someone had some made in China, but the ones he sold were not), you give someone who's on the fence an excuse to say you're just making stuff up because you hate him, and that person turns you off.
If you want people to see reason, you have to use reason, not debunked rumors. So call him out on using Chinese steel, not a debunked rumor about Chinese hats. Or don't. I don't know. Maybe a good one-liner is more important.
That's all I'm saying.
One thing I think we shouldn't do is conclude that dump's idiotic, immature behavior is part of a plan he has, that he is giving us the dead leg or is "up to something" nobody can see. It's tempting to think that, because there seems to be no other explanation for his (daily) idiotic behavior. But it's just who he is and who he always will be.
Others, though.
I don’t think Rufus was referring to duper with his hysterical comment
No, Hovey says the Left is getting all hysterical over Trump. Much ado about nothing. Just doing what all presidents do, no worries.
giving us the dead leg
Ahahahahahahahahahahaha.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Whoops. <a href="https://t.co/6LyEWfQ9A4">pic.twitter.com/6LyEWfQ9A4</a></p>— Ben Collins (@oneunderscore__) <a href="https://twitter.com/oneunderscore__/status/1127402224227880971?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">May 12, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
Wanting to limit the powers of the lower courts.
https://thehill.com/regulation/cour...imit-judges-powers-on-injunctions-after-legal
For everyone as confused as I, here.
"I wish I could name where it's at, but we can't name it because of the ACLU, these other liberal groups who want to sue us and impede our progress," he said. "But it's actually happening, the process is happening ... the project is moving forward."
I need some idiom help, here.
Ah yeah, I had forgotten about Hovey's hysterical comment.
It really is incredibly amazing how blind Trump supporters are willing to be.
Wait, Hovey's "not a Trump supporter. But..........."
People who lead good lives don't have to worry about dealing with pre-existing conditions.
Not a Trump supporter. If someone thinks they can find a post of mine supporting him, knock yourself out. Also, never claimed to be a centrist. I don’t think I’ve ever really categorized myself other than acknowledging that I’m likely more conservative than most in Cafe (not a real high bar). And rufus, yes too many people on social media respond in hysterics, a trap you frequently fall into.
As opposed to those who just don't give a fuk while their country ceases to exist.
now THIS is hysterical
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-cards="hidden" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Retired Supreme Court Justice: Trump is "exercising powers that do not really belong to him" <a href="https://t.co/2oVWDlYbyV">https://t.co/2oVWDlYbyV</a> <a href="https://t.co/jNGbyA3k2Q">pic.twitter.com/jNGbyA3k2Q</a></p>— The Hill (@thehill) <a href="https://twitter.com/thehill/status/1127819767296024576?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">May 13, 2019</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
What would he know though?