What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

POTUS 45:49: SNL Sucks. They're the real Collusion. 25th Amendment Them!!!!!!

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: POTUS 45:49: SNL Sucks. They're the real Collusion. 25th Amendment Them!!!!!!

Personally, I think we should just start pumping depo provera into the water supply of every state south of the mason Dixon.
 
Re: POTUS 45:49: SNL Sucks. They're the real Collusion. 25th Amendment Them!!!!!!

There are a thousand more effective ways to reduce abortions than voting for idiots that say they want to outlaw the practice.

Yeah but these people talk to Jesus...well they talk to people who talk to Jesus...and Jesus hates Abortions! And Gays!! AND HE NEEDS MONEY!!!

<img src="http://www.atheistrepublic.com/sites/default/files/styles/xlarge/public/487494_425248047562060_282208668_n.jpg?itok=MuY2DDlC" />
 
Re: POTUS 45:49: SNL Sucks. They're the real Collusion. 25th Amendment Them!!!!!!

Dump is probably the stupidest man in America to ever hold political office, let alone be president.

He's not at the very bottom: 63 million voted for him.
 
Re: POTUS 45:49: SNL Sucks. They're the real Collusion. 25th Amendment Them!!!!!!

So... a stupid person?

Edit: let me clarify. A one-issue voter is by definition a stupid person. Because they lack the mental capacity to weigh multiple variables at the same time. They lack the ability to understand nuance.

So yeah, stupid.

Reminds me of a great moment during yesterdays hearing when Rep Plaskett said "Thank God the Democratic majority can walk and chew gum at the same time."

That was funny.
 
Re: POTUS 45:49: SNL Sucks. They're the real Collusion. 25th Amendment Them!!!!!!

There are a thousand more effective ways to reduce abortions than voting for idiots that say they want to outlaw the practice.

Hey, if you close a lot of clinics, people will just give up and go home. That's why Gosnell had no clients....
 
Last edited:
Re: POTUS 45:49: SNL Sucks. They're the real Collusion. 25th Amendment Them!!!!!!

Yeah but these people talk to Jesus...well they talk to people who talk to Jesus...and Jesus hates Abortions! And Gays!! AND HE NEEDS MONEY!!!

Alternately,

<img src="https://alwaysquestionauthority.files.wordpress.com/2014/12/10371959_787109568030197_2487344434860161685_n.jpg" height="300">
 
Last edited:
Re: POTUS 45:49: SNL Sucks. They're the real Collusion. 25th Amendment Them!!!!!!

So... a stupid person?

Edit: let me clarify. A one-issue voter is by definition a stupid person. Because they lack the mental capacity to weigh multiple variables at the same time. They lack the ability to understand nuance.

So yeah, stupid.

I think it's possible for an issue to be of such overwhelming weight that nothing else matters. Given the way the Must Punish Sexually Active Women With Pregnancy types think, it seems pretty fair to me that they would not let anything else get in the way of their choice.

After all, if you allow other considerations it's possible you might wind up supporting a candidate who doesn't punish sexually active women with pregnancy, and then where would we all be?
 
Last edited:
Re: POTUS 45:49: SNL Sucks. They're the real Collusion. 25th Amendment Them!!!!!!

Case in point. Democratic House just passed another gun control measure. If they wanted they could just throw their hands up and say it's not going to pass the Senate anyway like Turtle Boy throws his hands up and says we're not going to vote on anything unless Dump approves of it first.
 
Re: POTUS 45:49: SNL Sucks. They're the real Collusion. 25th Amendment Them!!!!!!

So... a stupid person?

Edit: let me clarify. A one-issue voter is by definition a stupid person. Because they lack the mental capacity to weigh multiple variables at the same time. They lack the ability to understand nuance.

So yeah, stupid.
While I don't necessarily disagree with you I think people tend to be really horrible in general at weighting multiple variables and coming to an overall conclusion. Just think back to all the arguments you had on GPL about Delmon Young and some of the arguments that were made. "Well he hit 20 HRs and 112 RBI's!" while being legitimately horrible at baserunning and defense, somehow in their mind he was still some All Star despite the WAR metrics suggesting that he was more of a role player in that one year (and below replacement level every other year). Unsurprisingly he was out of the league before he turned 30. I see this a lot in hockey analytics circles where all encompassing WAR metrics aren't as developed and people just sorta pick and choose numbers at random to justify their narratives.

So it's not particularly surprising that it happens in this realm either despite it being far more important to our everyday lives. Especially when we're talking about nuanced topics that don't have easy solutions and people who are easily distracted by the culture wars.
 
Last edited:
Re: POTUS 45:49: SNL Sucks. They're the real Collusion. 25th Amendment Them!!!!!!

While I don't necessarily disagree with you I think people tend to be really horrible in general at weighting multiple variables and coming to an overall conclusion. Just think back to all the arguments you had on GPL about Delmon Young and some of the arguments that were made. "Well he hit 20 HRs and 112 RBI's!" while being legitimately horrible at baserunning and defense, somehow in their mind he was still some All Star despite the WAR metrics suggesting that he was more of a role player in that one year (and below replacement level every other year). Unsurprisingly he was out of the league before he turned 30. I see this a lot in hockey analytics circles where all encompassing WAR metrics aren't as developed and people just sorta pick and choose numbers at random to justify their narratives.

So it's not particularly surprising that it happens in this realm either despite it being far more important to our everyday lives. Especially when we're talking about nuanced topics that don't have easy solutions and people who are easily distracted by the culture wars.

Oh man, those were horrible arguments. I hated Delmon Young and his bandwagoners (rather, I hated that he was being paid money to play baseball by my team). You make a good point.

The ability to weigh multiple variables at the same time has to be the hallmark of intelligence, right?
 
Re: POTUS 45:49: SNL Sucks. They're the real Collusion. 25th Amendment Them!!!!!!


Yeah, it's what they were angling to do.

But of course if there's an investigation then there's discovery and I'm not sure these dumbas-ses want yet another opportunity to put on the record the evidence of all the times that Dumpy lied, cheated, and stole.

They're not very smart. No wonder they've risen in the GOP.
 
Re: POTUS 45:49: SNL Sucks. They're the real Collusion. 25th Amendment Them!!!!!!

I think it's possible for an issue to be of such overwhelming weight that nothing else matters. Given the way the Must Punish Sexually Active Women With Pregnancy types think, it seems pretty fair to me that they would not let anything else get in the way of their choice.

After all, if you allow other considerations it's possible you might wind up supporting a candidate who doesn't punish sexually active women with pregnancy, and then where would we all be?

Lots of sexually active women?
 
Re: POTUS 45:49: SNL Sucks. They're the real Collusion. 25th Amendment Them!!!!!!

Lots of sexually active women?

Exactly. What God-fearing conservative man would want his property -- wife or daughter -- being sexually active without consulting him?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top