There are a thousand more effective ways to reduce abortions than voting for idiots that say they want to outlaw the practice.
Dump is probably the stupidest man in America to ever hold political office, let alone be president.
So... a stupid person?
Edit: let me clarify. A one-issue voter is by definition a stupid person. Because they lack the mental capacity to weigh multiple variables at the same time. They lack the ability to understand nuance.
So yeah, stupid.
There are a thousand more effective ways to reduce abortions than voting for idiots that say they want to outlaw the practice.
Yeah but these people talk to Jesus...well they talk to people who talk to Jesus...and Jesus hates Abortions! And Gays!! AND HE NEEDS MONEY!!!
So... a stupid person?
Edit: let me clarify. A one-issue voter is by definition a stupid person. Because they lack the mental capacity to weigh multiple variables at the same time. They lack the ability to understand nuance.
So yeah, stupid.
While I don't necessarily disagree with you I think people tend to be really horrible in general at weighting multiple variables and coming to an overall conclusion. Just think back to all the arguments you had on GPL about Delmon Young and some of the arguments that were made. "Well he hit 20 HRs and 112 RBI's!" while being legitimately horrible at baserunning and defense, somehow in their mind he was still some All Star despite the WAR metrics suggesting that he was more of a role player in that one year (and below replacement level every other year). Unsurprisingly he was out of the league before he turned 30. I see this a lot in hockey analytics circles where all encompassing WAR metrics aren't as developed and people just sorta pick and choose numbers at random to justify their narratives.So... a stupid person?
Edit: let me clarify. A one-issue voter is by definition a stupid person. Because they lack the mental capacity to weigh multiple variables at the same time. They lack the ability to understand nuance.
So yeah, stupid.
After the social media rumors yesterday, we all knew this was coming...
While I don't necessarily disagree with you I think people tend to be really horrible in general at weighting multiple variables and coming to an overall conclusion. Just think back to all the arguments you had on GPL about Delmon Young and some of the arguments that were made. "Well he hit 20 HRs and 112 RBI's!" while being legitimately horrible at baserunning and defense, somehow in their mind he was still some All Star despite the WAR metrics suggesting that he was more of a role player in that one year (and below replacement level every other year). Unsurprisingly he was out of the league before he turned 30. I see this a lot in hockey analytics circles where all encompassing WAR metrics aren't as developed and people just sorta pick and choose numbers at random to justify their narratives.
So it's not particularly surprising that it happens in this realm either despite it being far more important to our everyday lives. Especially when we're talking about nuanced topics that don't have easy solutions and people who are easily distracted by the culture wars.
Saw this coming from Jordan and Meadows
https://thehill.com/homenews/house/...-doj-to-investigate-michael-cohen-for-perjury
I think it's possible for an issue to be of such overwhelming weight that nothing else matters. Given the way the Must Punish Sexually Active Women With Pregnancy types think, it seems pretty fair to me that they would not let anything else get in the way of their choice.
After all, if you allow other considerations it's possible you might wind up supporting a candidate who doesn't punish sexually active women with pregnancy, and then where would we all be?
Lots of sexually active women?
Lots of sexually active women?
Saw this coming from Jordan and Meadows
https://thehill.com/homenews/house/...-doj-to-investigate-michael-cohen-for-perjury
America First!
Binders, full of them.