POTUS 45.44: "That's Not Law" said Trump

[rufus]

Re: POTUS 45.44: "That's Not Law" said Trump

To me, it sounds less like the evil mastermind project by a handful of oligarchs driven by the top down. If it were just willing accomplices executing this high level master plan...I would think someone, somewhere would have outed it. I believe that the extreme players are in the state legislatures and are driving this from the bottoms up...cuz that's where its happening. That doesn't mean that the national GOP won't seize upon it. Again, who knows for sure.

Pretty sure there was nothing to out. It's not like what they were doing was illegal, or any big secret. Now, some of the steps they were taking to implement it were probably pretty shady, but still, just politics as usual.

 

[jerphisch]

Re: POTUS 45.44: "That's Not Law" said Trump

Is this just a deliberately obtuse post, or do you really not get this?

Some of you here, along with a bunch of halfwits in Wisconsin, Michigan and elsewhere don't get that this is lame duck legislation?? Lame duck legislation occurs literally every single time there is a change in power from one party to the other at either the state or federal level. The outgoing party knows "it's now or never" and the incoming party screams "foul" (although admittedly not with the shrillness of some of the D's in Wisconsin).

There is nothing illegal about it. There is nothing evil about it. It's no different than if they had passed the legislation last February. Personally I wouldn't pass a bunch of legislation like Wisconsin's since it's shortsighted -- there will almost certainly come a time when the Wisconsin legislature is controlled by the D's and the Governor is an R, but that's really their problem.

It is pretty ******* different than if they passed this in Feb. In Feb it would have been sincere legislation for something they believed in, clipping the power of the executive even though he was from their own party. Now it is a BS partisan power grab. Someone's obtuse, just not who you think.

 

[rufus]

Re: POTUS 45.44: "That's Not Law" said Trump

It is pretty ******* different than if they passed this in Feb. In Feb it would have been sincere legislation for something they believed in, clipping the power of the executive even though he was from their own party. Now it is a BS partisan power grab. Someone's obtuse, just not who you think.

Especially since they had previously passed legislation giving Walker all these powers that they now want to strip away from the governor's office.

 

[Deutsche Gopher Fan]

Is this just a deliberately obtuse post, or do you really not get this?

Some of you here, along with a bunch of halfwits in Wisconsin, Michigan and elsewhere don't get that this is lame duck legislation?? Lame duck legislation occurs literally every single time there is a change in power from one party to the other at either the state or federal level. The outgoing party knows "it's now or never" and the incoming party screams "foul" (although admittedly not with the shrillness of some of the D's in Wisconsin).

There is nothing illegal about it. There is nothing evil about it. It's no different than if they had passed the legislation last February. Personally I wouldn't pass a bunch of legislation like Wisconsin's since it's shortsighted -- there will almost certainly come a time when the Wisconsin legislature is controlled by the D's and the Governor is an R, but that's really their problem.

You’re the one who is obtuse if you think stripping these powers is usual lame duck activity.

 

[Handyman]

Is this just a deliberately obtuse post, or do you really not get this?

Some of you here, along with a bunch of halfwits in Wisconsin, Michigan and elsewhere don't get that this is lame duck legislation?? Lame duck legislation occurs literally every single time there is a change in power from one party to the other at either the state or federal level. The outgoing party knows "it's now or never" and the incoming party screams "foul" (although admittedly not with the shrillness of some of the D's in Wisconsin).

There is nothing illegal about it. There is nothing evil about it. It's no different than if they had passed the legislation last February. Personally I wouldn't pass a bunch of legislation like Wisconsin's since it's shortsighted -- there will almost certainly come a time when the Wisconsin legislature is controlled by the D's and the Governor is an R, but that's really their problem.

Sorry but this isn't usual lame duck BS.

 

[FadeToBlack&Gold]

Is this just a deliberately obtuse post, or do you really not get this?

Some of you here, along with a bunch of halfwits in Wisconsin, Michigan and elsewhere don't get that this is lame duck legislation?? Lame duck legislation occurs literally every single time there is a change in power from one party to the other at either the state or federal level. The outgoing party knows "it's now or never" and the incoming party screams "foul" (although admittedly not with the shrillness of some of the D's in Wisconsin).

There is nothing illegal about it. There is nothing evil about it. It's no different than if they had passed the legislation last February. Personally I wouldn't pass a bunch of legislation like Wisconsin's since it's shortsighted -- there will almost certainly come a time when the Wisconsin legislature is controlled by the D's and the Governor is an R, but that's really their problem.

They are trying to modify ballot proposals that we, the majority of the voters, voted for as written. In Michigan, They are also trying to strip campaign finance oversight powers from the SecState-elect, and that bill is sponsored by a guy who has been investigated and fined for violations multiple times.

So yeah, nitwit, you can pretty much get the fark outta here with that "both-sides" bullsh*t.

 

[unofan]

Is this just a deliberately obtuse post, or do you really not get this?

Some of you here, along with a bunch of halfwits in Wisconsin, Michigan and elsewhere don't get that this is lame duck legislation?? Lame duck legislation occurs literally every single time there is a change in power from one party to the other at either the state or federal level. The outgoing party knows "it's now or never" and the incoming party screams "foul" (although admittedly not with the shrillness of some of the D's in Wisconsin).

There is nothing illegal about it. There is nothing evil about it. It's no different than if they had passed the legislation last February. Personally I wouldn't pass a bunch of legislation like Wisconsin's since it's shortsighted -- there will almost certainly come a time when the Wisconsin legislature is controlled by the D's and the Governor is an R, but that's really their problem.

Yes, I remember all those democrats burning the government down when they lost in 1994 and 2010. Oh wait, they didn't happen.

Take that weak arse BSABSVR bullshiat outta here, meat.

 

[GrinCDXX]

Is this just a deliberately obtuse post, or do you really not get this?

Some of you here, along with a bunch of halfwits in Wisconsin, Michigan and elsewhere don't get that this is lame duck legislation?? Lame duck legislation occurs literally every single time there is a change in power from one party to the other at either the state or federal level. The outgoing party knows "it's now or never" and the incoming party screams "foul" (although admittedly not with the shrillness of some of the D's in Wisconsin).

There is nothing illegal about it. There is nothing evil about it. It's no different than if they had passed the legislation last February. Personally I wouldn't pass a bunch of legislation like Wisconsin's since it's shortsighted -- there will almost certainly come a time when the Wisconsin legislature is controlled by the D's and the Governor is an R, but that's really their problem.

If this is just business as usual, you should have no problem finding examples of Democrats weakening the powers of an office they just lost in an election. If you think that is ok, sorry, you're a POS.

 

[ScoobyDoo]

Is this just a deliberately obtuse post, or do you really not get this?

Some of you here, along with a bunch of halfwits in Wisconsin, Michigan and elsewhere don't get that this is lame duck legislation?? Lame duck legislation occurs literally every single time there is a change in power from one party to the other at either the state or federal level. The outgoing party knows "it's now or never" and the incoming party screams "foul" (although admittedly not with the shrillness of some of the D's in Wisconsin).

There is nothing illegal about it. There is nothing evil about it. It's no different than if they had passed the legislation last February. Personally I wouldn't pass a bunch of legislation like Wisconsin's since it's shortsighted -- there will almost certainly come a time when the Wisconsin legislature is controlled by the D's and the Governor is an R, but that's really their problem.

This one drank the GOP Kool-Aid.

 

[BassAle]

Is this just a deliberately obtuse post, or do you really not get this?

Some of you here, along with a bunch of halfwits in Wisconsin, Michigan and elsewhere don't get that this is lame duck legislation?? Lame duck legislation occurs literally every single time there is a change in power from one party to the other at either the state or federal level. The outgoing party knows "it's now or never" and the incoming party screams "foul" (although admittedly not with the shrillness of some of the D's in Wisconsin).

There is nothing illegal about it. There is nothing evil about it. It's no different than if they had passed the legislation last February. Personally I wouldn't pass a bunch of legislation like Wisconsin's since it's shortsighted -- there will almost certainly come a time when the Wisconsin legislature is controlled by the D's and the Governor is an R, but that's really their problem.

You may have just passed Drew as the dumbest poster on USCHO

 

[trixR4kids]

Re: POTUS 45.44: "That's Not Law" said Trump

Even if you think it’s business as usual is that a good thing? Is it something that should be a norm in our democracy? Or is it ok because republicans are doing it and it’s technically legal?

 

[dxmnkd316]

Re: POTUS 45.44: "That's Not Law" said Trump

Oof. talk about a complete roasting.

You know your post is horse**** when it gets that many rebukes.

 

[joecct]

Is this just a deliberately obtuse post, or do you really not get this?

Some of you here, along with a bunch of halfwits in Wisconsin, Michigan and elsewhere don't get that this is lame duck legislation?? Lame duck legislation occurs literally every single time there is a change in power from one party to the other at either the state or federal level. The outgoing party knows "it's now or never" and the incoming party screams "foul" (although admittedly not with the shrillness of some of the D's in Wisconsin).

There is nothing illegal about it. There is nothing evil about it. It's no different than if they had passed the legislation last February. Personally I wouldn't pass a bunch of legislation like Wisconsin's since it's shortsighted -- there will almost certainly come a time when the Wisconsin legislature is controlled by the D's and the Governor is an R, but that's really their problem.

You have to remember the tenets of this Board
1. Democrats can do no wrong and are geniuses.
2. Republicans are scum and are incapable of coherent thought.

 

[dxmnkd316]

Re: POTUS 45.44: "That's Not Law" said Trump

You have to remember the tenets of this Board
1. Democrats can do no wrong and are geniuses.
2. Republicans are scum and are incapable of coherent thought.

You want help with that last nail, joe?

 

[walrus]

Re: POTUS 45.44: "That's Not Law" said Trump

Oof. talk about a complete roasting.

You know your post is horse**** when it gets that many rebukes.

99 percent of the cafe shares a brain

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

 

[dxmnkd316]

Re: POTUS 45.44: "That's Not Law" said Trump

99 percent of the cafe shares a brain

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

I didn’t realize there would be a run on crosses today. Should have bought stock in Acme Crucifixion Supplies Co

 

[unofan]

You have to remember the tenets of this Board
1. Democrats can do no wrong and are geniuses.
2. Republicans are scum and are incapable of coherent thought.

So you're defending the GOP's actions?

 

[ScoobyDoo]

You have to remember the tenets of this Board
1. Democrats can do no wrong and are geniuses.
2. Republicans are scum and are incapable of coherent thought.

Another cult member. One wonders when they'll ever wake up.

 

[GrinCDXX]

You have to remember the tenets of this Board
1. Democrats can do no wrong and are geniuses.
2. Republicans are scum and are incapable of coherent thought.

Come on now, you're correct that Republicans are scum, but some of them are nonetheless capable of moments of coherent thought.

 

[Deleted member 3166]

You have to remember the tenets of this Board
1. Democrats can do no wrong and are geniuses.
2. Republicans are scum and are incapable of coherent thought.

You and Drew sharing a brain lately?