What's new
By:
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

POTUS 45.44: "That's Not Law" said Trump

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: POTUS 45.44: "That's Not Law" said Trump

He’s such a dem, he publicly talked about Hilary’s emails and notrussia before election

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">James Comey just totally exposed his partisan stance by urging his fellow Democrats to take back the White House in 2020. In other words, he is and has been a Democrat. Comey had no right heading the FBI at any time, but especially after his mind exploded!</p>— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) <a href="https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1072564293302976512?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">December 11, 2018</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
Re: POTUS 45.44: "That's Not Law" said Trump

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">“Former FBI Director James Comey under fire for his testimony acknowledging he knew that the Democrats paid for that phony Trump Dossier.” <a href="https://twitter.com/LouDobbs?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@LouDobbs</a> Details on Tuesday night.</p>— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) <a href="https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1072317149723717632?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">December 11, 2018</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

The entire history of that dossier has been reported. Why do you and your State Run Media (Lou Dobbs works for Fox) continue to lie about it? Why? Every time I think you can't be more ridiculous about repeating the same **** over and over and over again you repeat it again.
 
Re: POTUS 45.44: "That's Not Law" said Trump

Asked if he had any concerns that Trump was implicated, Hatch told CNN: “The Democrats will do anything to hurt this president.” Informed it was alleged by federal prosecutors in New York, Hatch said: “OK, but I don’t care, all I can say is he’s doing a good job as president.” […]

“I don’t think he was involved in crimes but even then, you know, you can make anything a crime under the current laws if you want to, you can blow it way out of proportion, you can do a lot of things.”
Click to expand...

Quoted without comment.
 
Re: POTUS 45.44: "That's Not Law" said Trump

From the NY Times.

A potential indictment of President Trump would look a lot like the charges prosecutors brought against John Edwards over payments to hide a pregnant mistress while he was running for president in 2008.
Click to expand...

That indictment failed.

On May 31, 2012, Edwards was found not guilty on Count 3, illegal use of campaign funding (contributions from Rachel "Bunny" Mellon), while mistrials were declared on all other counts against him.[2] On June 13, 2012, the Justice Department announced that it dropped the charges and would not attempt to retry Edwards.[3]
Click to expand...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Edwards
 
Re: POTUS 45.44: "That's Not Law" said Trump

Kelly's staying in the White House through at least the New Year while Trump tries to find a replacement.

So, no one wants a job where the boss ignores your advice, undermines and circumvents your position, and when you leave he insults you publicly? Weird.
 
Re: POTUS 45.44: "That's Not Law" said Trump

bronconick said:
Kelly's staying in the White House through at least the New Year while Trump tries to find a replacement.

So, no one wants a job where the boss ignores your advice, undermines and circumvents your position, and when you leave he insults you publicly? Weird.
Click to expand...

No, at least 10 people want it - a bigly number of the most immense bigness.
 
Re: POTUS 45.44: "That's Not Law" said Trump

Deutsche Gopher Fan said:
He’s such a dem, he publicly talked about Hilary’s emails and notrussia before election

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">James Comey just totally exposed his partisan stance by urging his fellow Democrats to take back the White House in 2020. In other words, he is and has been a Democrat. Comey had no right heading the FBI at any time, but especially after his mind exploded!</p>— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) <a href="https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1072564293302976512?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">December 11, 2018</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
Click to expand...

Yeah. Was wondering why Comey did that. It was so obvious that he'd be painted as partisan...and he was the one who torpedoed Clinton.
 
Re: POTUS 45.44: "That's Not Law" said Trump

Deutsche Gopher Fan said:
Over ten! How many of those are his kids?

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Fake News has it purposely wrong. Many, over ten, are vying for and wanting the White House Chief of Staff position. Why wouldn’t someone want one of the truly great and meaningful jobs in Washington. Please report news correctly. Thank you!</p>— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) <a href="https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1072483770819846144?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">December 11, 2018</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
Click to expand...

It's an episode of The Apprentice.
 
Re: POTUS 45.44: "That's Not Law" said Trump

bronconick said:
Kelly's staying in the White House through at least the New Year while Trump tries to find a replacement.

So, no one wants a job where the boss ignores your advice, undermines and circumvents your position, and when you leave he insults you publicly? Weird.
Click to expand...

Can you imagine the behind the scenes view when dumpy took credit for the shut down next week? The whole thing was a set up to show dumpy as some kind of person who is able to make a deal, and all he did was dig his own hole, and let Schumer and Pelossi just tell him that the hole isn't even.
 
Re: POTUS 45.44: "That's Not Law" said Trump

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-cards="hidden" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Trump "stormed out" of Oval Office, threw folder full of papers after Pelosi, Schumer meeting: report <a href="https://t.co/kcirnmmko7">https://t.co/kcirnmmko7</a> <a href="https://t.co/stLH0JF1M1">pic.twitter.com/stLH0JF1M1</a></p>— The Hill (@thehill) <a href="https://twitter.com/thehill/status/1072724247041241088?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">December 12, 2018</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
Re: POTUS 45.44: "That's Not Law" said Trump

Handyman said:
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-cards="hidden" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Trump "stormed out" of Oval Office, threw folder full of papers after Pelosi, Schumer meeting: report <a href="https://t.co/kcirnmmko7">https://t.co/kcirnmmko7</a> <a href="https://t.co/stLH0JF1M1">pic.twitter.com/stLH0JF1M1</a></p>— The Hill (@thehill) <a href="https://twitter.com/thehill/status/1072724247041241088?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">December 12, 2018</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
Click to expand...

Must've missed his afternoon nap...
 
Re: POTUS 45.44: "That's Not Law" said Trump

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-partner="tweetdeck"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Today Hannity deleted all his tweets prior to the November election. If you’re keeping score at home, Drudge deleted all his tweets this past month, while Fox News stopped tweeting altogether. I’m sure none of it has to do with Mueller or coordinating with a candidate/party.</p>— Rob Quigley &#55356;&#56826;&#55356;&#56824; (@RobQuigley) <a href="https://twitter.com/RobQuigley/status/1072729053004623872?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">December 12, 2018</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
Re: POTUS 45.44: "That's Not Law" said Trump

MinnesotaNorthStar said:
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-partner="tweetdeck"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Today Hannity deleted all his tweets prior to the November election. If you’re keeping score at home, Drudge deleted all his tweets this past month, while Fox News stopped tweeting altogether. I’m sure none of it has to do with Mueller or coordinating with a candidate/party.</p>— Rob Quigley ���� (@RobQuigley) <a href="https://twitter.com/RobQuigley/status/1072729053004623872?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">December 12, 2018</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
Click to expand...

They are not all that smart, are they? Given how many texts and tweets have been used against people in court, and given that the investigation started BEFORE the election... shouldn't they have been smart enough to delete that the day after dumpy won?

Which shows the quality of "journalist" that back this idiot.

Just like the morons in the dumpy group who SHOULD HAVE KNOWN that all russian official phone calls are monitored. Just because. How could anyone not know that??? Seems like that the monitoring would be just a matter of policy.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top