Handyman
Hug someone you care about...
If you're making 20K more, you are paying more in taxes, progressive or not.![]()
Right but that isn't the same thing. I should be taxed at a higher rate because I can be and survive.
If you're making 20K more, you are paying more in taxes, progressive or not.![]()
Right but that isn't the same thing. I should be taxed at a higher rate because I can be and survive.
And that's the disagreement. Just because you can, doesn't mean you should be forced to.![]()
Brent, another way to look at it. The poor don't live large. They typically live paycheck to paycheck, rent small apartments and just can't afford to do much else. The rich travel all the time, don't just own a car but often commute sizable distances, own large homes, shop and eat out quite a bit.
Everyone uses government infrastructure and services. The rich on average require and use many times more than someone who doesn't own much of anything, flips burgers all day and goes home to a microwave dinner.
I'm not poor, but I am far from rich. My "big day out" is to go to a local restaurant for lunch and a beer or two. That was my choice in life. I value other things more than money. I still am saying that I don't think it's right that if you earn more, you pay a higher rate of taxes.
I still am saying that I don't think it's right that if you earn more, you pay a higher rate of taxes.
And that's the disagreement. Just because you can, doesn't mean you should be forced to.![]()
I'm not poor, but I am far from rich. My "big day out" is to go to a local restaurant for lunch and a beer or two. That was my choice in life. I value other things more than money. I still am saying that I don't think it's right that if you earn more, you pay a higher rate of taxes.
And we're all saying you're 100 percent wrong.
And you're also ignoring the fact that the person making 40,000 and the person making 1,040,000 pay the same rate on that first 40,000. The person only pays the higher rate for the income above the threshold for a given bracket.
I personally think some sort of progressive tax structure is fine.If you're using many times more government infrastructure and services than someone else, shouldn't you pay a commensurate amount more for them?
Yes I should. I want social safety nets and good infrastructure along with quality education. (not to mention police and fire departments) I want society as a whole to benefit. If a couple thousand bucks more can help then it is my duty as an American to do so.
If you want the country to work, you need help from those who can help.
I personally think some sort of progressive tax structure is fine.
However, it does irk me when I read statements of alleged fact like you just wrote that I might use "many times more" government infrastructure and services than others.
I'd really like to see a link on that.
I know for a fact that my neighbor doesn't make 25% of what I make. But we drive down the same street to get home, the same cop drives by both our homes, the same street light lights our street, the same sewer line hauls both of our crap away, our kids went to the same school, etc...
Have I ever let you down?
The top third of Americans have an income of $65K and the bottom third have an income of $37.5K (wiki).
The upper third spends twice the lower third on gas, auto maintenance, insurance...and even public transport.
The upper third spends almost three times the lower third on eating out...and pets, media equipment and services, toys and admission events.
Now what do you think these numbers would be if we compared somebody earning $30K vs. somebody who makes say $200K? Are we good?
https://www.pewtrusts.org/en/resear...efs/2016/03/household-expenditures-and-income
flat taxes are a bad idea. Due to the diminishing marginal utility of money, a flat tax "harms" lower income people more than it harms high income people. A progressive tax structure is the most "fair".
I personally think some sort of progressive tax structure is fine.
However, it does irk me when I read statements of alleged fact like you just wrote that I might use "many times more" government infrastructure and services than others.
I'd really like to see a link on that.
I know for a fact that my neighbor doesn't make 25% of what I make. But we drive down the same street to get home, the same cop drives by both our homes, the same street light lights our street, the same sewer line hauls both of our crap away, our kids went to the same school, etc...
Yes, but it’s not about personal consumption. That’s a use tax or sales tax. Those are inherently regressive.
A person who makes $50,000 can’t afford to pay $1,000 in taxes as much as a person who makes $500,000 can afford $10,000.
If we want a flat tax, I want the first $250,000 exempted. The rich can fight it out over the rest.
This. It isn't like I pay the top percent on all my salary. I only paid the higher rate on a small portion that crossed the threshold.
I'm not poor, but I am far from rich. My "big day out" is to go to a local restaurant for lunch and a beer or two. That was my choice in life. I value other things more than money. I still am saying that I don't think it's right that if you earn more, you pay a higher rate of taxes.
However, it does irk me when I read statements of alleged fact like you just wrote that I might use "many times more" government infrastructure and services than others.
I'd really like to see a link on that.