What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

POTUS 45.41: We Need More Tax Cuts to pay for the Tax Cut

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: POTUS 45.41: We Need More Tax Cuts to pay for the Tax Cut

Is there any reason in particular you're channeling Flaggy, or is this how you're always going to act?

Why? Cause I refuse to not take what the President of the United States says at face value? What happens when a Democrat gets elected and no one believes him because no one believes in the Presidency anymore?

And, yes, I am concerned about that. I think the Office is being destroyed. My pointing it out may be unconventional but it's heartfelt and true.
 
Re: POTUS 45.41: We Need More Tax Cuts to pay for the Tax Cut

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">To review:<br><br>1. Kavanaugh's accuser is now on the record: Her name is Christine Blasey Ford<br><br>2. Ford has offered a detailed account of sexual assault by Kavanaugh<br><br>3. Ford's account corroborated by therapists notes from 2012<br><br>4. Ford passed a polygraph test by former FBI agent</p>— Judd Legum (@JuddLegum) <a href="https://twitter.com/JuddLegum/status/1041383564615602177?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 16, 2018</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
Re: POTUS 45.41: We Need More Tax Cuts to pay for the Tax Cut

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">To review:<br><br>1. Kavanaugh's accuser is now on the record: Her name is Christine Blasey Ford<br><br>2. Ford has offered a detailed account of sexual assault by Kavanaugh<br><br>3. Ford's account corroborated by therapists notes from 2012<br><br>4. Ford passed a polygraph test by former FBI agent</p>— Judd Legum (@JuddLegum) <a href="https://twitter.com/JuddLegum/status/1041383564615602177?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 16, 2018</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Should it matter now? I think it should. I thought it should yesterday. This should change things. Collins will still vote for him.
 
Re: POTUS 45.41: We Need More Tax Cuts to pay for the Tax Cut

Probably good she didnt go public before the hearing...she would have been destroyed by the morons on the Right on the committee.
 
Should it matter now? I think it should. I thought it should yesterday. This should change things. Collins will still vote for him.

It’ll be extra poignant when he’s the vote to destroy women’s rights
 
Re: POTUS 45.41: We Need More Tax Cuts to pay for the Tax Cut

FWIW:

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">NEWS: Sen. Jeff Flake (R-Ariz.) tells me in an intv he that doesn’t think the Judiciary Cmte should move ahead with its Thursday vote on Kavanaugh until they hear more from Christine Blasey Ford. “For me, we can’t vote until we hear more.”</p>— Sean Sullivan (@WaPoSean) <a href="https://twitter.com/WaPoSean/status/1041449153841254401?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 16, 2018</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
Re: POTUS 45.41: We Need More Tax Cuts to pay for the Tax Cut

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">To review:<br><br>1. Kavanaugh's accuser is now on the record: Her name is Christine Blasey Ford<br><br>2. Ford has offered a detailed account of sexual assault by Kavanaugh<br><br>3. Ford's account corroborated by therapists notes from 2012<br><br>4. Ford passed a polygraph test by former FBI agent</p>— Judd Legum (@JuddLegum) <a href="https://twitter.com/JuddLegum/status/1041383564615602177?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 16, 2018</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Well clearly Obama used his time machine to travel back to 2012...
 
Re: POTUS 45.41: We Need More Tax Cuts to pay for the Tax Cut

Well clearly Obama used his time machine to travel back to 2012...
The Deep State has been planting this one for a while. Lots of "backup" plans they've seeded over the last two centuries.
 
I notice Collins is not speaking out today. She had a long conversation with him. Funny she isn't on TV. She loves to be on TV.

Remember when she said she found the al Franken allegations to be credible and believable and appalling? Yeah .
 
Re: POTUS 45.41: We Need More Tax Cuts to pay for the Tax Cut

Remember when she said she found the al Franken allegations to be credible and believable and appalling? Yeah .

That airport interview was pretty revealing though. Her voice was weak and trembling, like she was gonna break down in tears at any moment. Like, "Just leave me alone!!" I guess that's what happens when you know you're a lying, conniving sack of ****, and you are being called out on it by pretty much everyone.

Almost enough to feel sorry for her, but she made her bed playing this phony "considerate moderate" game for too many years now to muster up the least little bit of concern for her. Hopefully Maine voters are smart enough to vote her out of office when her term is up.
 
Re: POTUS 45.41: We Need More Tax Cuts to pay for the Tax Cut

Y'all seem to be quite adamant about legislating from the bench, despite the fact that the courts have not only upheld Roe v. Wade, but also the PPACA.

Different courts, dumbass.
 
Re: POTUS 45.41: We Need More Tax Cuts to pay for the Tax Cut

If a case to challenge Roe came to the SC, and Roe were overturned, would not the issue fall back down to "the several States"?
 
If a case to challenge Roe came to the SC, and Roe were overturned, would not the issue fall back down to "the several States"?

Because the liberal women in the South deserve to have their constitutional rights stomped on?

Would you be similarly cavalier if a liberal court did the same thing to your gun rights?
 
Re: POTUS 45.41: We Need More Tax Cuts to pay for the Tax Cut

Please answer the question: Would the issue fall to the several States?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top