POTUS 45.41: We Need More Tax Cuts to pay for the Tax Cut

[The Sicatoka]

Re: POTUS 45.41: We Need More Tax Cuts to pay for the Tax Cut

So you don't care that poor women in the South will get ****ed. I'm not surprised at all.

Thomas P. "Tip" O'Neill quote here. If your local sucks, fix it. Fix it includes leave if that's what it takes.

PS - I've lived in ND, NY, FL, and MN. It's not theory to me.

 

[GrinCDXX]

Re: POTUS 45.41: We Need More Tax Cuts to pay for the Tax Cut

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">FEMA Chief notes many of the deaths post-Hurricane Maria may have been because of spousal abuse the President is not responsible for. <a href="https://t.co/vNvESNbveA">pic.twitter.com/vNvESNbveA</a></p>— Josh Marshall (@joshtpm) <a href="https://twitter.com/joshtpm/status/1041357671662841859?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 16, 2018</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

I was told by the President they didnt die. Now their husbands beat them to death?

Apparently in this administration "emergency" means "criticism of Trump" and "management" means "gaslighting".

 

[rufus]

Re: POTUS 45.41: We Need More Tax Cuts to pay for the Tax Cut

So ... win again.

It's kinda hard to win when the other side keeps breaking the rules so you can't.

If things worked as you seem to think they do, Merrick Garland would be a SC justice, and you wouldn't be "just asking the questions" about this subject.


The only way to start winning again is to root out this cancer from our government. You're not exactly helping in that area.

 

[GrinCDXX]

Re: POTUS 45.41: We Need More Tax Cuts to pay for the Tax Cut

It's kinda hard to win when the other side keeps breaking the rules so you can't.

If things worked as you seem to think they do, Merrick Garland would be a SC justice, and you wouldn't be "just asking the questions" about this subject.


The only way to start winning again is to root out this cancer from our government. You're not exactly helping in that area.

Amazingly, I think he was actually talking about winning another civil war.

 

[rufus]

Re: POTUS 45.41: We Need More Tax Cuts to pay for the Tax Cut

Oh, we can do that, too.

 

[Handyman]

Re: POTUS 45.41: We Need More Tax Cuts to pay for the Tax Cut

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-cards="hidden" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">LATEST: Trump plans to slap 10% tariff on $200 billion of Chinese goods <a href="https://t.co/73pmISBXnq">https://t.co/73pmISBXnq</a></p>— Bloomberg (@business) <a href="https://twitter.com/business/status/1041692951414493185?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 17, 2018</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

 

[Handyman]

Re: POTUS 45.41: We Need More Tax Cuts to pay for the Tax Cut

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Trump Jr. mocks Kavanaugh sexual assault allegation in Instagram post <a href="https://t.co/rMpjG97mK4">https://t.co/rMpjG97mK4</a> <a href="https://t.co/LXsZDksHya">pic.twitter.com/LXsZDksHya</a></p>— The Hill (@thehill) <a href="https://twitter.com/thehill/status/1041689254907260928?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 17, 2018</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

 

[Handyman]

Re: POTUS 45.41: We Need More Tax Cuts to pay for the Tax Cut

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) on Sunday told CNN that the Senate Judiciary Committee “might have to consider” delaying the vote to confirm Kavanaugh to give senators time to look into the allegations <a href="https://t.co/BD8h2mHKsL">https://t.co/BD8h2mHKsL</a> <a href="https://t.co/sYgeixlHE0">pic.twitter.com/sYgeixlHE0</a></p>— POLITICO (@politico) <a href="https://twitter.com/politico/status/1041688726676668423?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 17, 2018</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

 

[FlagDUDE08]

Re: POTUS 45.41: We Need More Tax Cuts to pay for the Tax Cut

It's kinda hard to win when the other side keeps breaking the rules so you can't.

If things worked as you seem to think they do, Merrick Garland would be a SC justice, and you wouldn't be "just asking the questions" about this subject.


The only way to start winning again is to root out this cancer from our government. You're not exactly helping in that area.

The cancer is being rooted from the government. Look at how desperate they are, clinging to their positions.

 

[burd]

Re: POTUS 45.41: We Need More Tax Cuts to pay for the Tax Cut

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-cards="hidden" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">LATEST: Trump plans to slap 10% tariff on $200 billion of Chinese goods <a href="https://t.co/73pmISBXnq">https://t.co/73pmISBXnq</a></p>— Bloomberg (@business) <a href="https://twitter.com/business/status/1041692951414493185?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 17, 2018</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

And also a 10% tariff on whichever countries Christine Blasey Ford's ancestors came from, because they're LIARS.

 

[aparch]

The cancer is being rooted from the government. Look at how desperate they are, clinging to their positions.

My God, you're right! Look at the scum desperate to stay in power!

 

[Handyman]

And also a 10% tariff on whichever countries Christine Blasey Ford's ancestors came from, because they're LIARS.

Don't give them any ideas...

 

[WeAreNDHockey]

Re: POTUS 45.41: We Need More Tax Cuts to pay for the Tax Cut

Why? Cause I refuse to not take what the President of the United States says at face value? What happens when a Democrat gets elected and no one believes him because no one believes in the Presidency anymore?

And, yes, I am concerned about that. I think the Office is being destroyed. My pointing it out may be unconventional but it's heartfelt and true.

That cat is out of the bag and 100 miles down the road. Unless the republicans continue to be successful in their voter suppression activities or trump manages to collude with the Russians again to steal the 2020 election, a democrat will probably be in the White House in 3 years and 40% of the population will believe absolutely zero of what he or she says. We've passed the political point of no return. Granted, there is ample evidence that we SHOULDN'T believe 90% of what comes out of the White House and trump supporters turn their nose up at most of the evidence based news and outright facts and believe none of it because they are dupes and rubes, but our politics have been, effectively, destroyed. Our only hope is to remove the party of fear, lies, and bigotry from power and wipe it out of existence. Perhaps then people will rescue it and make it something that competes based on ideas and patriotism, and if need be the same thing could then happen to the democrats. Don't hold your breath though.

 

[The Sicatoka]

Re: POTUS 45.41: We Need More Tax Cuts to pay for the Tax Cut

... Merrick Garland would be a SC justice,...

Garland is not on the court because of politics and not credentials. And that is wrong.

So many forget that one day the tables will be turned. Just look at what Reid did for McConnell with the nuclear option.

 

[The Sicatoka]

Re: POTUS 45.41: We Need More Tax Cuts to pay for the Tax Cut

Amazingly, I think he was actually talking about winning another civil war.

No, I'm saying win more than just on the battlefield. Win minds.

 

[rufus]

Re: POTUS 45.41: We Need More Tax Cuts to pay for the Tax Cut

No, I'm saying win more than just on the battlefield. Win minds.

Minds have been won. You looked at any polling recently?

It's just the other side who keep gaming the system so their side stays on top.


Can't believe you're this frickin' stupid. This is Flaggy material here.

 

[rufus]

Re: POTUS 45.41: We Need More Tax Cuts to pay for the Tax Cut

Garland is not on the court because of politics and not credentials. And that is wrong.

So many forget that one day the tables will be turned. Just look at what Reid did for McConnell with the nuclear option.

Yeah, but you weren't whining about it much at the time. So much more stuff for you to whine about now, all the terrible things Democrats do to those nice Republicans.

 

[French Rage]

Re: POTUS 45.41: We Need More Tax Cuts to pay for the Tax Cut

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">FEMA Chief notes many of the deaths post-Hurricane Maria may have been because of spousal abuse the President is not responsible for. <a href="https://t.co/vNvESNbveA">pic.twitter.com/vNvESNbveA</a></p>— Josh Marshall (@joshtpm) <a href="https://twitter.com/joshtpm/status/1041357671662841859?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 16, 2018</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

The administration believes so many people dies because their husbands beat them to death. Or as psychologists call it: projection.

 

[aparch]

I was told by the President they didnt die. Now their husbands beat them to death?

If it's only the husbands beating their significant others to death, I'm just impressed with how progressive Puerto Rico is with all their gay marriages!

 

[LynahFan]

Re: POTUS 45.41: We Need More Tax Cuts to pay for the Tax Cut

Way to ignore the part about the federal government being able to ban it. That ban would be nationwide. So no, the system wouldn't work.

Abortion is a constitutional right. A liberal court could kill the 2nd amendment by reinterpreting it based on the well regulated militia clause, just as the right wing members expanded it in Heller.

So you're not being pragmatic, you're dodging the question.

Stop playing concern troll for 5 minutes and answer it.

Amen.

Sik, to be consistent, I want to hear you say that SCOTUS got Loving v. Virginia wrong and that they should have ruled that Virginia had every right to enforce its anti-miscegenation law. After all, there's nothing in the Constitution declaring anti-miscegenation laws illegal, so that decision should be left to the several states (and the marketplace of ideas) to resolve, right? How DARE the Supreme Court invent the right to marry someone with a different skin color! Legislating from the bench!!!

Well?