What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

POTUS 45.39: Dick Pictures for Everyone!!!!!!!

Status
Not open for further replies.
Punctuation matters. The "lyin *** n****" looks like it's quoting another person. I'm not saying Trump isn't a racist, but that tweet isn't proof.

What I meant by it is obviously his reply of "why can you say the "n" word and Paula Dean can't," shows that he obviously has the "N" word in his vocabulary, especially since he wants to know the acceptability of its use.

I didn't post that thinking he actually typed it. I am well aware that he used the old-school copy/paste/quote form of re-Tweeting someone.


I was asking during his implied use of it during off-record "locker room talk" does Trump end the root word with "-a" or "-er?"
 
Re: POTUS 45.39: Dick Pictures for Everyone!!!!!!!

Obstruction of Justice.

WASHINGTON -- President Trump abruptly revoked the security clearance of ex-CIA Director John Brennan, an unprecedented act of retribution against a heavily critical former top U.S. official. Later, in an interview with The Wall Street Journal, Mr. Trump drew a direct connection between his decision and the Russia investigation, citing Brennan as among those he held responsible for the probe.

"I call it the rigged witch hunt, (it) is a sham," Mr. Mr. Trump told the Journal, which posted its story on its website Wednesday night. "And these people led it!"

He added: "So I think it's something that had to be done."

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/donald...y-clearance-russia-probe-wall-street-journal/
 
Re: POTUS 45.39: Dick Pictures for Everyone!!!!!!!

Sean Hannity's Reaction.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">“I’d strip the whole bunch of them. They’re all corrupt. They’ve all abused their power. They’ve all betrayed the American people with a political agenda. They tried to steal and influence an election in the United States.” <a href="https://twitter.com/seanhannity?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@seanhannity</a></p>— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) <a href="https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1029920861128720385?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">August 16, 2018</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
Re: POTUS 45.39: Dick Pictures for Everyone!!!!!!!

Mark Levin's Reaction.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Mark Levin “When they had power they didn’t stop the Russians, the Chinese, the North Koreans, they funded the Iranians & are responsible for the greatest scandal in American history by interfering with our election & trying to undermine the Trump Campaign and Trump Presidency.”</p>— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) <a href="https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1029918661165936641?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">August 16, 2018</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
Re: POTUS 45.39: Dick Pictures for Everyone!!!!!!!

So while we get upset of how dumpy acts, the money grab continues- but this time, protected areas are being open up to mining. https://www.sltrib.com/news/environment/2018/08/15/feds-release-management/

We are leaning heavily to money above ALL else, and not for the salaries of the people who actually do the work- since those have not yet budged under this administration.

This kind of greed and top heavy focus is what revolutions are born from. Check your history.
 
Re: POTUS 45.39: Dick Pictures for Everyone!!!!!!!

And Joe Digenova. The Classic. Lock the ***** up.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">“Hillary Clinton clearly got a pass by the FBI. We have the unfortunate situation where they then decided they were going to frame Donald Trump” concerning the Rigged Witch Hunt. JOE DIGENOVA, former U.S. Attorney.</p>— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) <a href="https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1029899109749202944?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">August 16, 2018</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
Re: POTUS 45.39: Dick Pictures for Everyone!!!!!!!

So while we get upset of how dumpy acts, the money grab continues- but this time, protected areas are being open up to mining. https://www.sltrib.com/news/environment/2018/08/15/feds-release-management/

We are leaning heavily to money above ALL else, and not for the salaries of the people who actually do the work- since those have not yet budged under this administration.

This kind of greed and top heavy focus is what revolutions are born from. Check your history.

Minnesota Democratic Senators love to ruin the earth for mining as well. Very disappointed in that. Very.

https://www.minnpost.com/politics-p...orporate-welfare-pandering-or-just-reasonable
 
Re: POTUS 45.39: Dick Pictures for Everyone!!!!!!!


Since Brennan wasn't in office, nor held any role in the investigation of Russian influence in the election, I don't think you can call it obstruction..

You can, however, call it the president using the power of the office to retaliate against those he perceives as his political enemies. Wonder if this is gonna be enough of a step to get Hovey or Joe to start worrying about the future of our democracy, or if this is just another thing not to worry about? And just what does he have to do before they do become concerned?

The normalizing of abnormal behavior.
 
Last edited:
Re: POTUS 45.39: Dick Pictures for Everyone!!!!!!!

Since Brennan wasn't in office, nor held any role in the investigation of Russian influence in the election, I don't think you can call it obstruction..

You can, however, call it the president using the power of the office to retaliate against those he perceives as his political enemies. Wonder if this is gonna be enough of a step to get Hovey or Joe to start worrying about the future of our democracy, or if this is just another thing not to worry about? And just what does he have to do before they do become concerned?

The normalizing of abnormal behavior.

No. It's obstruction. Part of being convicted of something is intent. His intentions have been clear all along. And every time he mentions the "rigged witch hunt" from the biggest bully pulpit on planet earth he is committing obstruction of justice.
 
Last edited:
Re: POTUS 45.39: Dick Pictures for Everyone!!!!!!!

No. It's obstruction. Part of being convicted of something is intent. His intentions have been clear all along. And every time he mentioned the "rigged witch hunt" . . . he is committing obstruction of justice.

That's trivializing the offense, isn't it?
 
Re: POTUS 45.39: Dick Pictures for Everyone!!!!!!!

Need to stop throwing around the obstruction line and replace it with treason, which covers both the collusion with Russia and the subsequent cover up.
 
Re: POTUS 45.39: Dick Pictures for Everyone!!!!!!!

I don't see why folks are in a tizzy over pulling the clearance of someone who no longer works for the Federal Government. I didn't retain mine when I left a clearance-required "need to know" position.

Mr. Brennan, no longer on the payroll, no longer has need to know. He's not in a position requiring clearance. If his historic knowledge is needed, he can be read-in on what he needs to know under a temporary clearance authorization.

As far as obstruction: He's not prosecuting; he's not investigating; he's not on the payroll; there's nothing about Mr. Brennan to "obstruct."

The other I've heard (CNN? MSNBC? One of those on S-XM) was "Brennan's First Amendment rights have been infringed." Really? In a word: No. He can still say anything he wants.


I put this courtesy of leaving top officials (either party) with clearance and access as something that never made sense to me. They're off the payroll. They no longer have need to know. (Need to know is the basis of all classified materials, even if you're cleared!) The justification I hear is "precedent". That's legalese for "there's no other justification than TTWWADI."


TTWWADI: that's the way we've always done it
 
Re: POTUS 45.39: Dick Pictures for Everyone!!!!!!!

I don't see why folks are in a tizzy over pulling the clearance of someone who no longer works for the Federal Government. I didn't retain mine when I left a clearance-required "need to know" position.

Mr. Brennan, no longer on the payroll, no longer has need to know. He's not in a position requiring clearance. If his historic knowledge is needed, he can be read-in on what he needs to know under a temporary clearance authorization.

As far as obstruction: He's not prosecuting; he's not investigating; he's not on the payroll; there's nothing about Mr. Brennan to "obstruct."

The other I've heard (CNN? MSNBC? One of those on S-XM) was "Brennan's First Amendment rights have been infringed." Really? In a word: No. He can still say anything he wants.


I put this courtesy of leaving top officials (either party) with clearance and access as something that never made sense to me. They're off the payroll. They no longer have need to know. (Need to know is the basis of all classified materials, even if you're cleared!) The justification I hear is "precedent". That's legalese for "there's no other justification than TTWWADI."


TTWWADI: that's the way we've always done it

No, it's not TTWWADI. We use these people as consultants for the rest of their lives. It's important for the continuity of Government and if I was the President I would be kind to the officials of the previous administration like Obama was.

Trump is a complete ****tard.
 
Re: POTUS 45.39: Dick Pictures for Everyone!!!!!!!

We use these people as consultants for the rest of their lives. It's important for the continuity of Government and if I was the President I would be kind to the officials of the previous administration like Obama was.

Because TTWWADI.



PS - The whole "continuity of Government" argument you make is pure jet fuel for the Alex Jonex cabal mindset of "we're run by globalists and the elite few". There is defined continuity of Government. It's Constitutionally defined without your definition.
 
Last edited:
I don't see why folks are in a tizzy over pulling the clearance of someone who no longer works for the Federal Government. I didn't retain mine when I left a clearance-required "need to know" position.

Mr. Brennan, no longer on the payroll, no longer has need to know. He's not in a position requiring clearance. If his historic knowledge is needed, he can be read-in on what he needs to know under a temporary clearance authorization.

As far as obstruction: He's not prosecuting; he's not investigating; he's not on the payroll; there's nothing about Mr. Brennan to "obstruct."

The other I've heard (CNN? MSNBC? One of those on S-XM) was "Brennan's First Amendment rights have been infringed." Really? In a word: No. He can still say anything he wants.


I put this courtesy of leaving top officials (either party) with clearance and access as something that never made sense to me. They're off the payroll. They no longer have need to know. (Need to know is the basis of all classified materials, even if you're cleared!) The justification I hear is "precedent". That's legalese for "there's no other justification than TTWWADI."


TTWWADI: that's the way we've always done it

Bless your heart.
 
No, it's not TTWWADI. We use these people as consultants for the rest of their lives. It's important for the continuity of Government and if I was the President I would be kind to the officials of the previous administration like Obama was.

Trump is a complete ****tard.

Then they can be read in if needed. Mookie not a fan of anyone getting classified briefs if they are out of gov.
 
Re: POTUS 45.39: Dick Pictures for Everyone!!!!!!!

Then they can be read in if needed. Mookie not a fan of anyone getting classified briefs if they are out of gov.

Some random person, no. The former CIA Director, who was himself probably involved in a lot of the long-running investigations still going on, yes.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top