I was just referring to this CNN story that I looked up after I saw Scooby's post.
https://www.cnn.com/2018/04/09/politics/michael-cohen-fbi/index.html
It mentions that "privileged" communications were seized.
Yeah, apparently a warrant was obtained, and maybe nothing "illegal" was done.
On the other hand, if I were someone that the government was targeting in an investigation and I had a lawyer, I'd be a little concerned about my rights if they came in and seized his files.
I guess I'd be curious to hear UNO's take on this. I can't imagine lawyers think it's that ideal.
I assume the government argued that Cohen somehow helped facilitate a crime, and I imagine in that setting the information is no longer privileged. But we hold pretty sacred in this country the right of individuals to legal counsel in criminal proceedings and this feels like a bit of a strong arm tactic to me.