What's new
By:
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

POTUS 45.29: Eggs and Tweet Storms for Breakfast

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: POTUS 45.29: Eggs and Tweet Storms for Breakfast

Brenthoven said:
The Dems didn't flaunt it. That's the point. Trump's admin is arrogant enough TO flaunt it. Every friggin pol abuses the spending, the system, etc. Tired of the "holier than thou" attitude by all parties.
Click to expand...

True. Yet only one party places fiscal responsibility as its top value add.
 
Brenthoven said:
Every politician abuses their power, especially to spending. To think otherwise is foolish. Truly foolish. That's my stance.
Click to expand...

So the Fark Independents (tm) are back to equating the common cold with cancer, because both make you feel bad. Never mind that one will kill you while the other just gives you the sniffles.

Seriously, Brent. Fark off with your both sides are bad bullcrap.
 
Re: POTUS 45.29: Eggs and Tweet Storms for Breakfast

Maybe Not The Best Thing To Say

In truth it means next to nothing...but maybe choose your words better. Especially since you are communications director. Then refusing to answer questions after that just makes it look twice as shady.
 
Re: POTUS 45.29: Eggs and Tweet Storms for Breakfast

Handyman said:
Maybe Not The Best Thing To Say

In truth it means next to nothing...but maybe choose your words better. Especially since you are communications director.
Click to expand...

They get to stonewall that committee cause they know that the Republicans who are in charge will not do anything about it. That committee and it's Senate counterpart are now destroyed. Any investigations going forward will have to be done by independent counsel or they will get nowhere.
 
ScoobyDoo said:
They get to stonewall that committee cause they know that the Republicans who are in charge will not do anything about it. That committee and it's Senate counterpart are now destroyed. Any investigations going forward will have to be done by independent counsel or they will get nowhere.
Click to expand...

It’s like the Jessica chastain skit on snl. No one cares.
Dump could shoot someone on 5th and certain people would tel is how obama was just as bad.
 
Re: POTUS 45.29: Eggs and Tweet Storms for Breakfast

Deutsche Gopher Fan said:
It’s like the Jessica chastain skit on snl. No one cares.
Dump could shoot someone on 5th and certain people would tel is how obama was just as bad.
Click to expand...

Yeah, and it's two pronged. You have the BSABSVR crowd. And then you have all the lefty groups that run for office by accusing both sides of being the same. They're not the same.
 
Re: POTUS 45.29: Eggs and Tweet Storms for Breakfast

Cant imagine why:

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-cards="hidden" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Anti-Semitic incidents soared in 2017, marking nation’s largest single-year increase, report finds <a href="https://t.co/jhog5Sol3c">https://t.co/jhog5Sol3c</a></p>— Washington Post (@washingtonpost) <a href="https://twitter.com/washingtonpost/status/968536285026668549?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">February 27, 2018</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
Re: POTUS 45.29: Eggs and Tweet Storms for Breakfast

rufus said:
Tax cuts, doing what they were intended to.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/plum-line/wp/2018/02/27/shocker-democrats-predictions-about-the-gop-tax-cut-are-coming-true/?utm_term=.ac47ecbb4213
Click to expand...

Best part.

And of course, most of the news media treated this argument in the standard he said/she said manner: Republicans say this, Democrats say that, and the truth lies in some secret location we may never actually reach.
Click to expand...

Typical Middle, blame both sides, BSABSVR BS. The whole debate was like that. So sick of it.

Great ending too.

If you’re a Republican, you look at this news and say, “So what?” Everything’s working out great: You got your tax cut, corporations and the wealthy are swimming in money, and the next time you take control of government you’ll do it all over again. Sure, Democrats will squawk, and all their criticisms and predictions will turn out to be right. But it hasn’t stopped you in the past, and it won’t in the future.
Click to expand...
 
Re: POTUS 45.29: Eggs and Tweet Storms for Breakfast

dxmnkd316 said:
He ****ing didn’t.
Click to expand...

Oh, he did. It was part of the same meeting where he said he's run into an active shooting site even if he wasn't armed. Went on to blather about violent video games, the stuff you see on the internet, and in movies.

“You see these movies, they’re so violent. And yet a kid is able to see the movie if sex isn’t involved, but killing is involved. And maybe they have to put a rating system for that.
Click to expand...
 
Re: POTUS 45.29: Eggs and Tweet Storms for Breakfast

Handyman said:
Cant imagine why:

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-cards="hidden" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Anti-Semitic incidents soared in 2017, marking nation’s largest single-year increase, report finds <a href="https://t.co/jhog5Sol3c">https://t.co/jhog5Sol3c</a></p>— Washington Post (@washingtonpost) <a href="https://twitter.com/washingtonpost/status/968536285026668549?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">February 27, 2018</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
Click to expand...

I'm shocked.
 
Re: POTUS 45.29: Eggs and Tweet Storms for Breakfast

dxmnkd316 said:
**** right off with this nonsense. This administration is setting all sorts of records for inappropriate spending. An EPA chief flying first class. A bevy of other secretaries flying private inappropriately. A $31,000 dining set cost twice as much as my first car. They’re making cuts to an agency that ensures affordable housing is available and they think it’s ok to spend $31k on a dining set and almost $4k on curtains?

This is corruption on a scale we haven’t seen. This is the kind of horse**** that takes place in banana republics.
Click to expand...

Don't forget the EPA chief's $25,000 Cone of Silence.

Cause the things discussed in his office need such top secret security.
 
Re: POTUS 45.29: Eggs and Tweet Storms for Breakfast

Brenthoven said:
I'm laughing insanely. You think the Ds don't abuse spending power? Really? The Trump Administration is FLAUNTING it. That doesn't excuse the same spending abuses of the Ds. It doesn't. And if you think that is the case, you are as blind as the Trumpers. Period.
Click to expand...

Why don't you list some of these Dem spending abuses for us, so we can compare and contrast?

Since you seem to know there are so many, ought to be a simple five minute task. Otherwise, you can just stuff it with this "both sides" nonsense.
 
Re: POTUS 45.29: Eggs and Tweet Storms for Breakfast

rufus said:
Tax cuts, doing what they were intended to.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/plum-line/wp/2018/02/27/shocker-democrats-predictions-about-the-gop-tax-cut-are-coming-true/?utm_term=.ac47ecbb4213
Click to expand...

It’s in part because lies about the future — and that’s what they are when you know that what you’re saying is utterly bogus — will not be policed with nearly the same vigor as lies about the past. If Trump claims that he had the largest inaugural crowd in history, it will immediately get shot down and subject to mockery even from neutral reporters. But if he says that all the benefits of his corporate tax cut will flow to workers, which is no less a lie, it will usually be met with “Critics question whether there is evidence to support his assertion.” When Republicans said that their tax cut wouldn’t increase the deficit because it would create so much economic growth that revenue would actually increase, it was treated as a questionable claim, not an assertion on par with “If I flap my arms, I can fly to the moon” or “With a week of training, my dog will be able to do a perfect rendition of ‘Enter Sandman’ on the electric guitar.”
Click to expand...

This is A+ stuff right here!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top