What's new
By:
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

POTUS 45.25: Oh Jesus, What Now

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: POTUS 45.25: Oh Jesus, What Now

Frank Montoya, Jr., a former FBI special agent who served as the Director of the Office of the National Counterintelligence Executive, soon after told Business Insider, “There is a lot of anger in the FBI … over how this president will say nary a negative word about the Russians, but will insult us every chance he gets.”
Click to expand...

Yeah, this isn't a problem.
 
Re: POTUS 45.25: Oh Jesus, What Now

SJHovey said:
I know literally nothing about this nominee so I'm not here to comment on whether he should or should not be a judge, but the whole "how many depositions have you taken" or "when was the last time you sat down and read the rules of civil procedure" line of questions are kind of b.s., imho.

Take someone like Ruth Ginsburg. IIRC, she went straight from law school to academia and then onto the bench. She seems plenty capable enough.

I'm sure that lawyers who appear in district court appreciate a judge who is well-seasoned in trials and trial procedure, but if you limit judicial candidates to only those people you are probably eliminating a lot of very bright, very qualified candidates.
Click to expand...

You apparently know very little of RBG's background. Not only did she clerk for a judge, but she also litigated numerous cases. Hell, she argued a half-dozen cases in front of the Supreme Court, and is largely responsible for extending the 14th Amendment's Equal Protection Clause to women.

My guess is she would know what a Motion in limine is, and might be able to venture a guess at the Daubert standard. Those are things district court judges deal with constantly. I would be appalled if my next judge in either state or district court did not know what either were. I mean, would you take your car to a mechanic who didn't know what an oil filter was?
 
Re: POTUS 45.25: Oh Jesus, What Now

Fighting Sioux 23 said:
You apparently know very little of RBG's background. Not only did she clerk for a judge, but she also litigated numerous cases. Hell, she argued a half-dozen cases in front of the Supreme Court, and is largely responsible for extending the 14th Amendment's Equal Protection Clause to women.

My guess is she would know what a Motion in limine is, and might be able to venture a guess at the Daubert standard. Those are things district court judges deal with constantly. I would be appalled if my next judge in either state or district court did not know what either were. I mean, would you take your car to a mechanic who didn't know what an oil filter was?
Click to expand...
I don't claim to be an expert on Ginsburg, but it was my recollection that her litigation career was more along the lines of a "solicitor general" type of career, where she primarily appeared for oral argument in front of the US Appellate courts or US Supreme Court, and not out taking depositions or litigating product liability cases.
 
Re: POTUS 45.25: Oh Jesus, What Now

aparch said:
Suckers!


Dems need to jump on this. Locally, both federal and state D congressmen (or potential congressmen) should be working to get these people to vote for them and work with them. Have an ear to the ground. The D's ignored these people on accident. Republicans swooped in and are ignoring them while profiting.
Click to expand...

Trumpy and the Repubs don't care about small businesses. It's all about the 1%. Whatever's good for Tyson Foods, Perdue, and Hormel is good for America. The only worth those farmers have is what they can provide for the big packers.
 
Re: POTUS 45.25: Oh Jesus, What Now

Trump administration has given the cdc list of words that are banned from being used in official docs
The forbidden words are “vulnerable,” “entitlement,” “diversity,” “transgender,” “fetus,” “evidence-based” and “science-based.”

**** these people and **** everyone who voted for them
 
Deutsche Gopher Fan said:
Trump administration has given the cdc list of words that are banned from being used in official docs
The forbidden words are “vulnerable,” “entitlement,” “diversity,” “transgender,” “fetus,” “evidence-based” and “science-based.”

**** these people and **** everyone who voted for them
Click to expand...
Are you ****ing kidding me,?
 
ScoobyDoo said:
Are you ****ing kidding me,?
Click to expand...

No I’m not ****ing kidding
https://www.washingtonpost.com/national/health-science/cdc-gets-list-of-forbidden-words-fetus-transgender-diversity/2017/12/15/f503837a-e1cf-11e7-89e8-edec16379010_story.html?tid=ss_tw&utm_term=.aed0ab980e5e
 
Deutsche Gopher Fan said:
Trump administration has given the cdc list of words that are banned from being used in official docs
The forbidden words are “vulnerable,” “entitlement,” “diversity,” “transgender,” “fetus,” “evidence-based” and “science-based.”

**** these people and **** everyone who voted for them
Click to expand...

It’s like this administration was made up by a bad dystopian novelist
 
Re: POTUS 45.25: Oh Jesus, What Now

Here is a list of the new approved words...

vulnerable -> Weak a**
entitlement -> Liberal Leaches
diversity -> Liberal Propaganda
transgender -> Non-human
fetus -> God's precious gift
evidence-based -> Liberal Mumbo Jumbo
science-based -> Sorcery
 
Re: POTUS 45.25: Oh Jesus, What Now

Deutsche Gopher Fan said:
Trump administration has given the cdc list of words that are banned from being used in official docs
The forbidden words are “vulnerable,” “entitlement,” “diversity,” “transgender,” “fetus,” “evidence-based” and “science-based.”

**** these people and **** everyone who voted for them
Click to expand...

I'm sure the CDC will fall right in line. :rolleyes:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top