What's new
By:
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

POTUS 45.12: Dan, does it take courage when encountering the covfefe?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: POTUS 45.12: Dan, does it take courage when encountering the covfefe?

dxmnkd316 said:
This would have to be the final straw, right?
Click to expand...

He could replace him with Subway Jared and the underwear stains that currently make up the republican caucus in the house won't do a da mn thing. If -- and only if -- a critical mass of House or Senate republicans feel like sitting idly by will cost them an election will they take action. Does anyone really believe differently? Seriously and all kidding aside, does anyone think there is something trump is likely to do, or something that he's already done that we will reasonable proof of, that would lead republicans to move to get him out of the White House? He's dangerously incompetent, pathologically dishonest, and already committed acts that would have gotten Clinton impeached already if she'd have won.

At this point, pray for continued gridlock. With any luck there are enough Americans who are not old white men and will vote sensibly in 2018 (or earlier).
 
Re: POTUS 45.12: Dan, does it take courage when encountering the covfefe?

Oh my god. Did anyone see the video of the cabinet praising trump?

My skin hadn't crawled like that in a while.
 
Re: POTUS 45.12: Dan, does it take courage when encountering the covfefe?

Slap Shot said:
Re-posting a previous link about Trump supposedly considering firing Mueller because the comments section makes me weep for my country. http://dailycaller.com/2017/06/12/report-trump-weighing-firing-special-counsel-robert-mueller/

It's no wonder Trump was elected. My goodness. :(
Click to expand...

Its my considered opinion that the comments sections of articles on news websites is the single worst thing that has ever happened to the dissemination of news. I encourage everyone to pass the comments by. I refuse to read them. Some years ago a lot of sites went to using facebook or other identifiable ways of trying to shine a light on who comments but by then the cat was already out of the bag. That we live in a "look at me society" is evident by a lot of things, none moreso than who the president is. But when you think about it, there really is no other reason for the comments section. You click on an online article to learn about an event. Why do the comments even need to be there. My primary goal is not to find out what people are thinking about the revelation, for instance, that trump was considering firing Mueller, just that he was and what he or his people said about it. But if there isn't some intensely personal angle now, too many people won't bother I guess. Ridiculous. Sort of like how your local news seems to find a local connection to big national stories, no matter how minor or inconsequential the connection is.

Boycott the comments sections my friends. Move along. Nothing to see there.
 
Re: POTUS 45.12: Dan, does it take courage when encountering the covfefe?

WeAreNDHockey said:
Its my considered opinion that the comments sections of articles on news websites is the single worst thing that has ever happened to the dissemination of news. I encourage everyone to pass the comments by. I refuse to read them. Some years ago a lot of sites went to using facebook or other identifiable ways of trying to shine a light on who comments but by then the cat was already out of the bag. That we live in a "look at me society" is evident by a lot of things, none moreso than who the president is. But when you think about it, there really is no other reason for the comments section. You click on an online article to learn about an event. Why do the comments even need to be there. My primary goal is not to find out what people are thinking about the revelation, for instance, that trump was considering firing Mueller, just that he was and what he or his people said about it. But if there isn't some intensely personal angle now, too many people won't bother I guess. Ridiculous. Sort of like how your local news seems to find a local connection to big national stories, no matter how minor or inconsequential the connection is.

Boycott the comments sections my friends. Move along. Nothing to see there.
Click to expand...

Reading the Comments section is a good way to see what propaganda is being disseminated to the base, as they mindlessly echo it back. Historians will now always know what the contemporary masses were thinking (well, emoting) about events. "The Emancipation Proclamation is an unconstitutional power grab by N-ggerlover Lincoln and the Deep State. The cucks in the Army of Northern Virginia are deliberately failin' The Cause and will be punished by Gawd!"
 
Re: POTUS 45.12: Dan, does it take courage when encountering the covfefe?

dxmnkd316 said:
Oh my god. Did anyone see the video of the cabinet praising trump?

My skin hadn't crawled like that in a while.
Click to expand...

Having already put the all-time record for Pants-On-Fire lies out of reach, Trump is looking to do the same with cringe-worthy moments. All that was missing was the opening prayer: "Oh, come let us adore him, oh come let us adore him, Tru-ump, our (swamp) King."
 
Re: POTUS 45.12: Dan, does it take courage when encountering the covfefe?

Trump's approval/disapproval numbers hit a new worst.

Edit: I stand corrected. 3/26 was a point worse.

Another interesting trend: Nate points out the "strongly support" numbers for Trump have eroded.

There’s been a considerable decline in the number of Americans who strongly approve of Trump, from a peak of around 30 percent in February to just 21 or 22 percent of the electorate now. (The decline in Trump’s strong approval ratings is larger than the overall decline in his approval ratings, in fact.) Far from having unconditional love from his base, Trump has already lost almost a third of his strong support. And voters who strongly disapprove of Trump outnumber those who strongly approve of him by about a 2-to-1 ratio, which could presage an “enthusiasm gap” that works against Trump at the midterms.
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
Re: POTUS 45.12: Dan, does it take courage when encountering the covfefe?

The most corrupt administration ever.

Former U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara, who was removed from his post by the Trump administration last week, was overseeing an investigation into stock trades made by the president’s health secretary, according to a person familiar with the office.

Tom Price, head of the Department of Health and Human Services, came under scrutiny during his confirmation hearings for investments he made while serving in Congress. The Georgia lawmaker traded hundreds of thousands of dollars worth of shares in health-related companies, even as he voted on and sponsored legislation affecting the industry.

Price testified at the time that his trades were lawful and transparent. Democrats accused him of potentially using his office to enrich himself. One lawmaker called for an investigation by the Securities and Exchange Commission, citing concerns Price could have violated the STOCK Act, a 2012 law signed by President Obama that clarified that members of Congress cannot use nonpublic information for profit and requires them to promptly disclose their trades.

The investigation of Price’s trades by the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York, which hasn’t been previously disclosed, was underway at the time of Bharara’s dismissal, said the person.
Click to expand...
 
Re: POTUS 45.12: Dan, does it take courage when encountering the covfefe?

Newsmax guy is doubling down on his sources for the Trump is going to fire Mueller story. Pundits I heard this morning believe that even if Trump did that Ryan and Turtle Boy would still support him. There is nothing this man can do where his party will leave him.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top