What's new
By:
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

POTUS 45.08: Suckers

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: POTUS 45.08: Suckers

St. Clown said:
With your conditional set on their attack jobs, should anybody really be surprised they went after Kushner? While it's not universally believed, many think of him as the Democrat in elephant's clothing, only along for the ride because of who he rides at night.
Click to expand...

That's a good point. They seem to hate ahem (((him))) and while they ogle Ivanka like the grubby high school fat slob trying to peek at the posh rich girl's bra, they could turn on her as a coastal elite if things broke right.
 
Re: POTUS 45.08: Suckers

Kepler said:
Is he a House member or an NC State Rep? As crazy and stupid as the former can be, if you want to take a walk on the wild side get familiar with state legislators. That's where you get a true cross-section of the public in all its glory.
Click to expand...

U.S. Congress. "From" Charlotte, but I don't think the city itself is part of his district.
 
Re: POTUS 45.08: Suckers

Kepler said:
You hafta do bad stuff for the Post to go after you if you're an "R." They're a good indicator of the Righty Bloid Mentality. Perhaps the worm is turning and Archie Bunker's patience with Trump is wearing thin.
Click to expand...

I wonder if the worm might turn a little more quickly if the media shifts their focus towards the legislators who enable trump to continue, unabated. He has clearly committed impeachable offenses, has conflicts of interest that could keep investigators busy for the next 20 years, and at best will be an utter failure while at worst the consequences are almost impossible to imagine. The media needs to begin asking the tough questions of the very people who could hold trump accountable and make their chairs a little hotter. We all know that they will only turn on a member of their party when doing otherwise would cost them enough votes to lose an election. Well, start shining a light on these traitors and make them act in the nation's interest (even if we all know they're acting first in their own interests).
 
Re: POTUS 45.08: Suckers

Kepler said:
You hafta do bad stuff for the Post to go after you if you're an "R." They're a good indicator of the Righty Bloid Mentality. Perhaps the worm is turning and Archie Bunker's patience with Trump is wearing thin.
Click to expand...

Yeah, like letting Soros-funded Mr. Ivanka Trump run things, as opposed to the person who took the oath also takes the reins.
 
Re: POTUS 45.08: Suckers

WeAreNDHockey said:
I wonder if the worm might turn a little more quickly if the media shifts their focus towards the legislators who enable trump to continue, unabated. He has clearly committed impeachable offenses, has conflicts of interest that could keep investigators busy for the next 20 years, and at best will be an utter failure while at worst the consequences are almost impossible to imagine. The media needs to begin asking the tough questions of the very people who could hold trump accountable and make their chairs a little hotter. We all know that they will only turn on a member of their party when doing otherwise would cost them enough votes to lose an election. Well, start shining a light on these traitors and make them act in the nation's interest (even if we all know they're acting first in their own interests).
Click to expand...

What has Trump done that is impeachable? Provide specific examples.

If anything, assuming you don't want Trump's ideas to actually take shape, the GOP Congress is actually helping you. Paul Ryan is your best friend right now.

If the GOP wants to actually take a stand, they need to stop giving in to Democrats. They have control of everything, yet they can't do any of their policies because they're too worried about the whiny weakling from Brooklyn.
 
Re: POTUS 45.08: Suckers

FlagDUDE08 said:
Yeah, like letting Soros-funded Mr. Ivanka Trump run things, as opposed to the person who took the oath also takes the reins.
Click to expand...

Hey, you guys voted for Trump and Trump is the one who thinks No Not That Jared The Other One is Da Vinci. Either way, it's on Trump.
 
Re: POTUS 45.08: Suckers

Kepler said:
Coordinated with the intelligence service of a foreign power to influence an American election.
Click to expand...
I can't wait to read in the history books about how back in 2016 Trump conspired with the KGB to hornswoggle all those straight A grade hounds into staying home in November.
 
Re: POTUS 45.08: Suckers

FlagDUDE08 said:
I didn't vote for Trump. Or are you lumping us all into some "regressive party"?
Click to expand...

I am lumping you in with people who think InfoWars and Breitbart and the Free Beacon and the Washington Times are information, not propaganda. You people* gave us Trump. You may not have pulled the lever for him, though in all honesty I can't imagine why -- Trump is basically Flag plus a billion** dollars, you will never get another chance to vote for somebody so you -- but you are the reason this country could choose somebody like that. Homo gullibilis.

* George: "You people ---"
Archie: "Hold on! Who are you calling 'you people'? Us people aren't 'you people.' YOU PEOPLE are 'you people'!"
Click to expand...

** Probably closer to 300 million
 
Last edited:
Re: POTUS 45.08: Suckers

Kepler said:
I am lumping you in with people who think InfoWars and Breitbart and the Free Beacon and the Washington Times are information, not propaganda. You people* gave us Trump. You may not have pulled the lever for him, though in all honesty I can't imagine why -- Trump is basically Flag plus a billion** dollars, you will never get another chance to vote for somebody so you -- but you are the reason this country could choose somebody like that. Homo gullibilis.



**
Probably closer to 300 million
Click to expand...

Whatever the amount of money is, or how a small subset of beliefs are aligned, no one is Flag other than yours truly. Why would I want a wall? As good as they are at keeping people out, they're also good at keeping people in. Something that should always be asked whenever a new regulation or piece of legislation comes into play: What will happen if other parties are responsible for enforcing this? Never mind what it was designed to do, what else does it have the ability to do? What sort of baggage goes with it? And with complex legislation, what happens if something receives a "line item veto"?

It's nice you think I'm responsible for people being sick of the bureaucracy that exists in DC, heck that's probably why Anti-fa wants to rip it all up, but last I checked, exposing public records to the masses isn't propaganda.
 
Re: POTUS 45.08: Suckers

Kepler said:
Gotta admit, I read that Comment string for far longer than usual.

There are some bad feels on the right...
Click to expand...

I had to read it...I am both scared for the future of society and laughing because they became the sheep they thought we all were ;)
 
Re: POTUS 45.08: Suckers

Kepler said:
Gotta admit, I read that Comment string for far longer than usual.

There are some bad feels on the right...
Click to expand...

I can sum it up in five words/numbers: It's 2011 all over again. That's when I lost my faith in the Republican party.
 
FlagDUDE08 said:
What has Trump done that is impeachable? Provide specific examples.
Click to expand...
Welp, nothing yet, but his rotation at chairing the U.N. Security council is coming.

Which... if I'm not mistaken... you so boldly told us that it was unconstitutional for a sitting president to chair any global council position.

:D
 
Re: POTUS 45.08: Suckers

aparch said:
Welp, nothing yet, but his rotation at chairing the U.N. Security council is coming.

Which... if I'm not mistaken... you so boldly told us that it was unconstitutional for a sitting president to chair any global council position.

:D
Click to expand...

They actually already had the chance, and it was the incredibly male-chauvinist choice of Nikki Haley. ;)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top