Out of curiosity, who are the "real" Huskies?I've been impressed by both these teams so far this year (although I haven't seen as much of SCSU yet). I would give the edge to SCSU due to home ice and getting their boys back from IR. I say 3 pts for the fake Huskies.
Out of curiosity, who are the "real" Huskies?
I just find it funny that you call them that because I have a buddy that went to school in Kato and he calls UNO the "fake" Mavs(because he considers MSU to be the real Mavs).
I don't mean to put down anyone, but I was at the U for these two games last weekend. UNO is a big and fast team. I'm not saying they're a top 5 team in college hockey (frankly I'm not sure Minnesota is either yet) BUT the excuse of not beating anyone doesn't really apply. So St. Cloud has a win against Denver and UND, they also have a loss in each series. In addition, the Huskies split with UMD, UNO swept them.
How does the fact that they have only one win against a team with a winning record NOT apply? Because they are big and fast? You never really explained that.
I am not trying to convince anybody of anything. If you think UNO is a better team than SCSU, great. We will find out this weekend.
BTW, the Huskies played UMD on the road. UNO played them at home. Not exactly comparing apples to apples.
I've seen both SCSU and UNO play this season and they are pretty evenly matched. Both can stretch the ice offensively with their speed, and both are pretty solid defensively.
Should be a good series.
Sorry, let me clarify. It doesn't really matter because in general, I believe UNO has proven themselves more than SCSU. Sure, as I mentioned, St. Cloud picked up W's against two (supposedly) tough teams in UND and Denver. They also got handled in the other games (3-0 and 6-1). Splitting is fine against good teams and if State has swept the teams they were supposed to, then I would agree with your point about "playing no one" and give the nod to SCSU. However since SCSU hasn't been able to take care of the teams they probably should sweep (UMD and UAA) I have to argue that UNO has the advantage (with the exception of BSU) in the last few weeks because they managed a split, and kept it close against a tough team (Minnesota) and handled the teams they should have by sweeping (UMD, Michigan Tech and UA-H). Furthermore UNO is hot at the moment while SCSU has been playing slightly below average the last 4 games. And sometimes it's not who you play, but when you play them.
We weren't handled by UND, Saunders had a horseshoe up his ***.
The DU game looks bad, but it was closer than that, both Faragher and Reijola had 2 soft ones each in that game.
And where you play a team does matter IMO, and I think had we played UMD and UAA at home, they are both sweeps, not splits and we look a lot better heading into this series.
I know that's all in the past, but again the big thing for us is going to be getting back to work, especially the guys we count on (Hano, Dowd, LeBlanc, Jensen, Prochno) to lead us every night.
As far as beating teams over .500 goes, if we somehow get a sweep at St. Cloud, they'll be another one of those teams right at .500, so these wins will mean nothing too, right?
I have been going to games for years and posting and lurking on various forms for years. No one I had ever talked to was happy about our performance last year. Not even at the end of December. Anyone who watched last year's team would know why. ****ty power play, not great goaltending, forwards weren't getting it all done. It was not the best team last year.There were consistently .500 the whole season then had four straight losses to end it out. It was not the Mavs best team and I don't remember anyone saying so.
Secondly, this IS a team I am happy about and have a lot of hope for after watching. You also didn't answer my question
If UNO somehow pulls a sweep, SCSU would be one of those .500 teams that UNO had beat...so would the wins still mean nothing?
It's all in spirited debate, sir! If you're not mistaken, I also said, and still believe, that this team is right where it deserves and has earned at #14, I don't think they have proved themselves any better yet. But as a fan, I have seen a lot to cheer and be hopeful about.
I have been going to games for years and posting and lurking on various forms for years. No one I had ever talked to was happy about our performance last year. Not even at the end of December. Anyone who watched last year's team would know why. ****ty power play, not great goaltending, forwards weren't getting it all done. It was not the best team last year.There were consistently .500 the whole season then had four straight losses to end it out. It was not the Mavs best team and I don't remember anyone saying so.
Secondly, this IS a team I am happy about and have a lot of hope for after watching. You also didn't answer my question
If UNO somehow pulls a sweep, SCSU would be one of those .500 teams that UNO had beat...so would the wins still mean nothing?
It's all in spirited debate, sir! If you're not mistaken, I also said, and still believe, that this team is right where it deserves and has earned at #14, I don't think they have proved themselves any better yet. But as a fan, I have seen a lot to cheer and be hopeful about.
Asking this as a serious question: What exactly does a team have to do (who do they have to beat, do splits count or only sweeps) to be considered a "tough" or "good" team in your eyes? What makes a team "unproven"?
Sure that'll make Skeets happy.![]()