Kepler
Cornell Big Red
Re: Obama XVIII : Now with 100% more Gov't sponsored starvation
I think you've identified both ends of the dilemma. We did face this situation in some part before, though, with the transition from agricultural labor to semi- and high-skilled industrial labor. By the end of the 19th century we were seeing the already well-developed agribusinesses moving off shore to cheaper Third World sources. A huge percentage of the American labor pool was still categorized as "laborers" then -- part of what exascrebated the Great Depression was food price deflation. From the 30's through the 60's, jobs moved "indoors" to unionized factory floors, higher education became democratized, and the middle class grew precisely because of a concern for "social justice" now so snidely dismissed by people with a hardon to return to the Gilded Age.
The government doesn't have to be the sole provider of these opportunities -- it seems like half the great men who rose from poverty during the golden age of the America middle class between 1935 and 1975 came from private Catholic schools. But the government does have a role through things like the GI Bill, guarantees of savings, and a progressive tax code that prevents an aristocracy from choking off the American dream.
The Dems were in charge of protecting that until recently, but it appears more and more that even they have been co-opted, in which case we really only have a tiny clique running the show now. It's my clique, and I'll do fine. But if I were the rest of you, I'd be pissed.
It does make sense that the high end pays a larger share of the total taxes, as their share of total income has also grown. I generally agree with you that this growing chasm between the rich and poor in this country, with less of a middle class, is a bad trend. I'm just not sure how it can be reversed, or meaningfully slowed down. Basic jobs that used to pay a good wage, in an industry like textiles, can now be done overseas for a small fraction of the cost, so those type of decent paying jobs just aren't around like they used to be. Even higher end jobs like engineering are increasingly going elsewhere. There is some job creation in other/new sectors, but it's pretty murky to try to figure out how one can restore/maintain the middle class in this country. Of course on the flip side, you have a sizable chunk of the population paying no federal income taxes and even maybe getting some credits back, and such a situation can lead to those folks pushing for more spending, since none of it is directly coming out of their own pocket. Problematic stuff all the way around.
I think you've identified both ends of the dilemma. We did face this situation in some part before, though, with the transition from agricultural labor to semi- and high-skilled industrial labor. By the end of the 19th century we were seeing the already well-developed agribusinesses moving off shore to cheaper Third World sources. A huge percentage of the American labor pool was still categorized as "laborers" then -- part of what exascrebated the Great Depression was food price deflation. From the 30's through the 60's, jobs moved "indoors" to unionized factory floors, higher education became democratized, and the middle class grew precisely because of a concern for "social justice" now so snidely dismissed by people with a hardon to return to the Gilded Age.
The government doesn't have to be the sole provider of these opportunities -- it seems like half the great men who rose from poverty during the golden age of the America middle class between 1935 and 1975 came from private Catholic schools. But the government does have a role through things like the GI Bill, guarantees of savings, and a progressive tax code that prevents an aristocracy from choking off the American dream.
The Dems were in charge of protecting that until recently, but it appears more and more that even they have been co-opted, in which case we really only have a tiny clique running the show now. It's my clique, and I'll do fine. But if I were the rest of you, I'd be pissed.