Here's a novel concept...ignore the trolls and answer serious questions (if you feel there's snark hidden in an honest question, ignore the snark and just answer the legitimate question). You wanted to know how really complicated things could have evolved, I offered a paper that sites well over 100 independent research papers on the topic, bringing together all the information in a manner that, I feel, a lot of lay people could understand on a very rudimentary level and see that there are ways our hyper-complex eye could have evolved, but you just went on 'feeding the trolls' instead of actually discussing the topic. I find it funny that you have all the time in the world to respond to trolls but can't actually respond to serious inquiries, and when called out on it, say you don't want to feed the trolls so you won't discuss it anymore.
If you were truly open to other viewpoints, you'd have read the paper and posited you critique of it from a scientific standpoint because that's the world where evolution lives. Just get off you high horse and admit that you don't care to read up on the topic and you don't want your world view challenged. Science is all about challenging what you know, when I start a set of experiments, I do all I can to disprove what I think, same goes for every scientist out there. It's a discredit to say science is unwilling to change because you don't like the conclusions and simply want it to change, and it's just sad to repeat decades old anti-evolution talking points that have been disproved for as long as those 'points' have been brought up. If science didn't challenge itself, our world would look a heck of a lot differently. It's not the devil, Bob, far from it, it's the only thing we have that actually helps people in need. Does it get things wrong? Heck yeah it does, and the first people to admit that are scientists. If there was solid scientific proof that evolution doesn't exist, there'd be a huge front page article on it in Science, Cell, or Nature.
