giwan
Really??!!
Re: Northern Michigan University Wildcats 2016-17 Season Thread: Gotta Get Up And Try
A smaller school yes but still 7k plus students and an alumni base that has some serious cash. The other sports all D3 except for the women's hockey team D1.
Is their old barn OLD? YES very much but do they need a NEW place to win. I don't buy it and I base that on old Lakeview among other places, I mean look at the Mac, same old place, very well kept and updated. Not sure what RPI funding is but the money is out there for them if they know how to get it. I know details on their updates, been there very recently. They did do a great job on their ECAV, spent that money well but that was a decade ago, though you couldn't tell it was that long ago based on how it looks.
The article sounds more like an apology for the coach. They had some serious issues with some of their players and not sure it was handled the best way. Seth may be a great coach but the alumni were knocking on the door.
Face it each school that has increased their success has increased their funding. For some that was easy and some it will not be. Just changing coaches is not the answer, and whether Walt deserved more time is another story. You can argue just as the writer argued that RPI was looking better toward the end so were the Cats. Both coaches had been there a while under .500 records, and maybe just needed a change. We will soon see.
RPI did hire a search committee, not sure their full role but started there. Have not heard what the NMU plans are besides a nationwide search.
This is unknown territory that the hockey program is headed through. May the past schools who have navigated this path prior (MTU, BGSU, Notre Dame) or are still navigating through it (LSSU, UAA) act as the "canary in the mine shaft" to direct the University on how to proceed.
RPI, although a tiny specialized engineering school in New York, is currently along side us in these same troubled waters. Concern can be heard from them on how to proceed: Troy Record: Coaching change not enough to revive RPI hockey.
Please Forrest Kart and the Board of Trustees; please take heed, and progress wisely, fully prepared to support this program as it should be.
A smaller school yes but still 7k plus students and an alumni base that has some serious cash. The other sports all D3 except for the women's hockey team D1.
Is their old barn OLD? YES very much but do they need a NEW place to win. I don't buy it and I base that on old Lakeview among other places, I mean look at the Mac, same old place, very well kept and updated. Not sure what RPI funding is but the money is out there for them if they know how to get it. I know details on their updates, been there very recently. They did do a great job on their ECAV, spent that money well but that was a decade ago, though you couldn't tell it was that long ago based on how it looks.
The article sounds more like an apology for the coach. They had some serious issues with some of their players and not sure it was handled the best way. Seth may be a great coach but the alumni were knocking on the door.
Face it each school that has increased their success has increased their funding. For some that was easy and some it will not be. Just changing coaches is not the answer, and whether Walt deserved more time is another story. You can argue just as the writer argued that RPI was looking better toward the end so were the Cats. Both coaches had been there a while under .500 records, and maybe just needed a change. We will soon see.
RPI did hire a search committee, not sure their full role but started there. Have not heard what the NMU plans are besides a nationwide search.