What's new
By:
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

NMU @ UND: MTU Has Told Us So Much About You!!!

RaceBoarder

RaceBoarder

Waiting for the Snow to fly...
First time in a long time that NMU will face off with North Dakota... I believe this will be the first time NMU will be playing in The Ralph as well...

Kinda bummed I can't make this trip :(
 
Re: NMU @ UND: MTU Has Told Us So Much About You!!!

The last time I saw NMU play, they had nine shots of goal in a game and Jordan Foote turtled like the little weenie he is to some talentless Wildcat player. Worst game I've ever seen. If NMU does that again, they'll ruin Christmas.

UND Sweep.

PS - Your arena sucks
 
Re: NMU @ UND: MTU Has Told Us So Much About You!!!

Dirty said:
The last time I saw NMU play, they had nine shots of goal in a game and Jordan Foote turtled like the little weenie he is to some talentless Wildcat player. Worst game I've ever seen. If NMU does that again, they'll ruin Christmas.

UND Sweep.

PS - Your arena sucks
Click to expand...

I guess that explains why UND won't be making a return trip next year :p
 
Re: NMU @ UND: MTU Has Told Us So Much About You!!!

Shane Doan out indefinitely with a knee injury...

NMU has the injury bug full bore this season it seems :(
 
Dirty said:
The last time I saw NMU play, they had nine shots of goal in a game and Jordan Foote turtled like the little weenie he is to some talentless Wildcat player. Worst game I've ever seen. If NMU does that again, they'll ruin Christmas.

UND Sweep.

PS - Your arena sucks
Click to expand...

You kindness and warmth toward opposing fans is amazing. I hope there are another 11,000 Dirtys at the rink.
 
Re: NMU @ UND: MTU Has Told Us So Much About You!!!

davyd83 said:
You kindness and warmth toward opposing fans is amazing. I hope there are another 11,000 Dirtys at the rink.
Click to expand...

There won't be, but there might be 11,000 Dirty wannabes. We're all afflicted.
 
Re: NMU @ UND: MTU Has Told Us So Much About You!!!

davyd83 said:
You kindness and warmth toward opposing fans is amazing. I hope there are another 11,000 Dirtys at the rink.
Click to expand...

Oh please, Dirtbag talks a big game, but he's a wimp. :p ;)

Not that his statement was inaccurate, of course. That game was absolutely the worst college hockey game of the last decade. I'm assuming that you and I were both in MQT that night, so we both know it. Worst of all, it should be considered a "victory" for NMU.
 
Re: NMU @ UND: MTU Has Told Us So Much About You!!!

FadeToBlack&Gold said:
Oh please, Dirtbag talks a big game, but he's a wimp. :p ;)

Not that his statement was inaccurate, of course. That game was absolutely the worst college hockey game of the last decade. I'm assuming that you and I were both in MQT that night, so we both know it. Worst of all, it should be considered a "victory" for NMU.
Click to expand...
All I remember from that night was Matt Siddall beating the crap out of Jordan Foote... and the EAT A SANDWICH chant that came my way.
 
Re: NMU @ UND: MTU Has Told Us So Much About You!!!

I didnt know visually impairing the goalie was a penalty. I thought that was called a screen. I watched the play over and over. Even UNDs announcers said it was a good goal. They went on and on about how bad of a call it was to disallow the goal. I cant say NMU would have tied it up, but I can say it killed the momentum. A total BS call. I have no respect for the NCHA refs after tonight.
 
noremorse1 said:
I didnt know visually impairing the goalie was a penalty. I thought that was called a screen. I watched the play over and over. Even UNDs announcers said it was a good goal. They went on and on about how bad of a call it was to disallow the goal. I cant say NMU would have tied it up, but I can say it killed the momentum. A total BS call. I have no respect for the NCHA refs after tonight.
Click to expand...

NCHC I mean.
 
Re: NMU @ UND: MTU Has Told Us So Much About You!!!

noremorse1 said:
I didnt know visually impairing the goalie was a penalty. I thought that was called a screen. I watched the play over and over. Even UNDs announcers said it was a good goal. They went on and on about how bad of a call it was to disallow the goal. I cant say NMU would have tied it up, but I can say it killed the momentum. A total BS call. I have no respect for the NCHA refs after tonight.
Click to expand...


Here's one UND fan that agrees... for once, UND got a homer call. Color me shocked.
 
Re: NMU @ UND: MTU Has Told Us So Much About You!!!

The UND coach called that a good call in ths post game interview. BS. NMU wins tomorrow.
 
Re: NMU @ UND: MTU Has Told Us So Much About You!!!

noremorse1 said:
I didnt know visually impairing the goalie was a penalty. I thought that was called a screen. I watched the play over and over. Even UNDs announcers said it was a good goal. They went on and on about how bad of a call it was to disallow the goal. I cant say NMU would have tied it up, but I can say it killed the momentum. A total BS call. I have no respect for the NCHA refs after tonight.
Click to expand...

In the rulebook, it says you can't visually impair the goalie WHILE in the crease. Other goals you see with screens you can see the player is on the edge of the crease, which is why they count when reviewed for goalie interference. The replay clearly showed the NMU player in the crease. Which is why it was disallowed.

I believe the rule is on pg 74 of the rulebook if you want to look it up.
 
willythekid said:
Here's one UND fan that agrees... for once, UND got a homer call. Color me shocked.
Click to expand...

Dont get me wrong... UND played a good game and deserved the win. However, that was a momentum changer. Had it not been disallowed, who knows. Anyhow... Ill step off my soap box. I have loads of respect for the program UND has and hope NMU gets to play them more in the future.
 
Re: NMU @ UND: MTU Has Told Us So Much About You!!!

I don't necessarily disagree. However, Rule 73.1 reads:

Interference on the Goalkeeper - A player of the attacking team may stand on the goal crease line or in the goal crease, or skate through the goal crease, unless, in the opinion of the official, the player is physically or visually preventing the goalkeeper from defending the goal.

If a goal is scored, it shall be disallowed.
 
sfo19 said:
In the rulebook, it says you can't visually impair the goalie WHILE in the crease. Other goals you see with screens you can see the player is on the edge of the crease, which is why they count when reviewed for goalie interference. The replay clearly showed the NMU player in the crease. Which is why it was disallowed.

I believe the rule is on pg 74 of the rulebook if you want to look it up.
Click to expand...

From what I saw he was initially in the crease and backed out before the goal was scored.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top