So the memorial for the Muslim girl who was killed in DC was set on fire...good lord.
But of course, it wasn't a hate crime. Crimes against Muslims are never hate crimes, even when they are green carders or citizens.![]()
Um, the London attack was not only considered a hate crime, it was terrorism.
Regardless, it's all relative now, I guess. One nutjob in Flint stabs a cop while screaming "Allahu Akbar!" and because he's a Muslim it's "terrorism". Therefore, Muslims are supposedly everywhere in Flint and it's "the left's fault". Meanwhile, a white guy does the same thing, and it's "mental illness", and "oh, poor Lapeer, if only they had jobs..." while Grand Blanc smokes cigars and laughs.
Excuse my cynicism, but everyone knows I'm a jerk, and I'm a pi55ed off one at that.
If one does it for a cause (that white boy who wanted a race war, for example), that's terrorism. You start screaming "Allahu Akbar" that will be associated with the Muslim religion, and therefore our current definition of terrorism.
It was a "cause" when McVeigh "did it for Waco/Ruby Ridge". I beg you, don't be that cause (I know you're too smart).
What if the guy at the airport saw a cop, realized he had dark skin, and then feared for his life since cops like to kill dark people? Justified? Oh, that only works one way?
What if the guy at the airport saw a cop, realized he had dark skin, and then feared for his life since cops like to kill dark people? Justified? Oh, that only works one way?
If one does it for a cause (that white boy who wanted a race war, for example), that's terrorism. You start screaming "Allahu Akbar" that will be associated with the Muslim religion, and therefore our current definition of terrorism.
You shoot up a place because you are postal (yes, I chose that word intentionally)? Not terrorism. Mentally disturbed, etc.
Wow.
He runs to the safe space and changes his underwear while the attendant hands him a box of tissues to wipe away his tears.
It's WSJ so I'm guessing Detroit?
It's WSJ so I'm guessing Detroit?