What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

NHL 2019-20 #1: Where Toronto Plans To Win Without Playing Defense.

Re: NHL 2019-20 #1: Where Toronto Plans To Win Without Playing Defense.

I wonder if you could make a tidy living just betting against teams with delusional fanbases: Notre Dame, USC, Michigan; the Cowboys and Redskins; the Leafs and Rangers; the Knicks. Homer Arbitrage.

I don't know about making a living doing that, but "Pros" absolutely know that there is a finger on the scale with teams like that.
 
Re: NHL 2019-20 #1: Where Toronto Plans To Win Without Playing Defense.

I wonder if you could make a tidy living just betting against teams with delusional fanbases: Notre Dame, USC, Michigan; the Cowboys and Redskins; the Leafs and Rangers; the Knicks. Homer Arbitrage.

The sports books also know that certain teams attract a lot of betting, including many that you listed.
 
Re: NHL 2019-20 #1: Where Toronto Plans To Win Without Playing Defense.

The sports books also know that certain teams attract a lot of betting, including many that you listed.

Do they build in a fudge factor?

I always assumed (I guess incorrectly) that the odds were a simple mathematical function of the action. The line moved always towards equality of action on either side of it, like a stock price. I thought it was just a deterministic function and the only input of the House was setting the initial seed.
 
Re: NHL 2019-20 #1: Where Toronto Plans To Win Without Playing Defense.

Do they build in a fudge factor?

I always assumed (I guess incorrectly) that the odds were a simple mathematical function of the action. The line moved always towards equality of action on either side of it, like a stock price. I thought it was just a deterministic function and the only input of the House was setting the initial seed.

The fudge factor comes in by moving the line. That is where "Pros" make their moves. If it plays out well enough, then can bacsically have winning bets on both sides based on small window(s) of certain outcomes...
 
Re: NHL 2019-20 #1: Where Toronto Plans To Win Without Playing Defense.

Do they build in a fudge factor?

I always assumed (I guess incorrectly) that the odds were a simple mathematical function of the action. The line moved always towards equality of action on either side of it, like a stock price. I thought it was just a deterministic function and the only input of the House was setting the initial seed.

The initial line by the books is just a kind of feeling out process. They set the line kind of where they think it should be based upon a variety of factors, including past experience that a lot of fans will bet the Patriots, for instance, or bet a favorite. Then, as the sharp money comes in they adjust it accordingly.

The sharp money waits for the initial line, waiting to pounce. They usually have their own "line" in mind, and if the initial line at the books is different enough, they will hit it hard.

Sometimes they'll put some early money down on one side just to see if they can get a shift in the line from the books, then bet big on the other side later in the week. A lot of sports books will have lower betting limits early, then raise them as the week goes on.

It's kind of interesting to watch. You might see a game where the line is set, and then a few days later you'll see that 85% of all the tickets are on one side but the line hasn't moved. That tells you that the public is the 85%, but the sharp money is going against the public and is putting enough money down to balance out the large disparity in tickets sold.
 
Re: NHL 2019-20 #1: Where Toronto Plans To Win Without Playing Defense.

The initial line by the books is just a kind of feeling out process. They set the line kind of where they think it should be based upon a variety of factors, including past experience that a lot of fans will bet the Patriots, for instance, or bet a favorite. Then, as the sharp money comes in they adjust it accordingly.

The sharp money waits for the initial line, waiting to pounce. They usually have their own "line" in mind, and if the initial line at the books is different enough, they will hit it hard.

Sometimes they'll put some early money down on one side just to see if they can get a shift in the line from the books, then bet big on the other side later in the week. A lot of sports books will have lower betting limits early, then raise them as the week goes on.

It's kind of interesting to watch. You might see a game where the line is set, and then a few days later you'll see that 85% of all the tickets are on one side but the line hasn't moved. That tells you that the public is the 85%, but the sharp money is going against the public and is putting enough money down to balance out the large disparity in tickets sold.

I didn't know there was a way of telling how much action went where.

In any case, you've disabused me of the notion that the line is driven by math. It's manually set and moved by the broker.

So clearly the way to beat the House is to infiltrate them and throw the line. :-)
 
Last edited:
Re: NHL 2019-20 #1: Where Toronto Plans To Win Without Playing Defense.

Skating the cup to start the season feels weird.
 
Re: NHL 2019-20 #1: Where Toronto Plans To Win Without Playing Defense.

Toronto blew a 4-1 lead today against the Habs, lose 6-5.

I'm laughing. Straight up laughing my flat *** off.
 
Re: NHL 2019-20 #1: Where Toronto Plans To Win Without Playing Defense.

Toronto blew a 4-1 lead today against the Habs, lose 6-5.

I'm laughing. Straight up laughing my flat *** off.

a.k.a. the last 50 years of Leafs hockey neatly summarized in one game.

For the Isles we will go up 4-zip in the first 8 minutes and then lose 26-4.
 
Re: NHL 2019-20 #1: Where Toronto Plans To Win Without Playing Defense.

Toronto blew a 4-1 lead today against the Habs, lose 6-5.

I'm laughing. Straight up laughing my flat *** off.

Every year, same old story.

<img src="https://i.pinimg.com/originals/64/e2/3c/64e23c004ac91637f7a256aba3a63b71.jpg"></img>
 
Re: NHL 2019-20 #1: Where Toronto Plans To Win Without Playing Defense.

<img src="https://i.pinimg.com/236x/40/fe/25/40fe254c04e5ffaabcab10dc81a08981--toronto-on-canada-leaf-logo.jpg" >
 
Re: NHL 2019-20 #1: Where Toronto Plans To Win Without Playing Defense.

I'll be... the Wings beat the Habs tonight.

This has been a good start... but talk to me again in February and again in April.
 
Re: NHL 2019-20 #1: Where Toronto Plans To Win Without Playing Defense.

I'll be... the Wings beat the Habs tonight.

This has been a good start... but talk to me again in February and again in April.

First regulation win IN Montreal for the Wings since December 2007.


Now, to conquer their curse of Philadelphia; Zero regulation wins in Philly since winning the cup in 1997.
 
Re: NHL 2019-20 #1: Where Toronto Plans To Win Without Playing Defense.

This thread title applies to the Wild as well. They couldnt stop a mite team.
 
Re: NHL 2019-20 #1: Where Toronto Plans To Win Without Playing Defense.

The Leafs have not won a cup in mookie's lifetime :)
 
Back
Top