NFL 2026-27: Someone's Curse Has To End Soon.

[cF[Authentic]]

You've got Baltimore twice (East & North) and are missing Indianapolis. I'd imagine they're a better fit geographically for the north.

TN and Pitt could be swapped to keep some rivalries for the old AFC North.

Regardless, it's a stupid idea to base a league on geography because 1) teams move and 2) you're locking yourself in to future expansion locations. If you expand by 4 teams you have to space it out evenly or now you're moving teams to a random other division. When St. Louis and San Diego come back and you add in San Antonio and Portland where do these teams go? I guess KC loses all of their rivals to join the North? But St. Louis fits that area better. Do they both join and Pitt gets kicked to the East? SA joins the south is the only easy one if you add 4.

 

[Slap Shot]

If that means the Vikings and Packers can't play each other 2x per year I'm fully against it.

 

[Bronco]

I love the NFC North and I don't need to see the Ohio teams every year.

 

[MissThundercat]

Betting that Harrison Butker is out as Chiefs kicker.

But his replacement will be like shitting your pants and changing your shirt.

 

[ScoobyDoo]

Bears tried to lose last night, but didn't. And the NFC North is a logjam at the top. Vikings will be at the bottom by year end.

 

[St. Clown]

The Vikings have officially traded for Kirk Cousins. They gave up a 3rd round pick.

 

[SonofSouthie]

The Vikings have officially traded for Kirk Cousins. They gave up a 3rd round pick.

Anybody is better than that clown that was out there last night. I watched the 2nd qtr and that was enough for me.

 

[MichVandal]

Anybody is better than that clown that was out there last night. I watched the 2nd qtr and that was enough for me.

Unless you are going to get some blocking, Kurt isn't going to last the season.

 

[Kepler]

You've got Baltimore twice (East & North) and are missing Indianapolis. I'd imagine they're a better fit geographically for the north.

TN and Pitt could be swapped to keep some rivalries for the old AFC North.

Regardless, it's a stupid idea to base a league on geography because 1) teams move and 2) you're locking yourself in to future expansion locations. If you expand by 4 teams you have to space it out evenly or now you're moving teams to a random other division. When St. Louis and San Diego come back and you add in San Antonio and Portland where do these teams go? I guess KC loses all of their rivals to join the North? But St. Louis fits that area better. Do they both join and Pitt gets kicked to the East? SA joins the south is the only easy one if you add 4.

Well, you know me. I'd contract to 8 if I really had my way:

NFL

West

Det Lions
Min Vikings
GB Packers
Chi Bears

East

Clv Browns
NY Giants
Was Redskins
Bal Colts

NCAA

West

Michigan
Ohio State
Notre Dame
Minnesota

East

Yale
Princeton
Army
Cornell

 

[state of hockey]

Unless you are going to get some blocking, Kurt isn't going to last the season.

Last night was not on the o line, while obviously them being mediocre (at best) doesn’t help. Wentz couldn’t hit water if he fell out of a boat last night. I take that back, he was quite accurate if the target was between the numbers of Bills d backs.

 

[MichVandal]

Last night was not on the o line, while obviously them being mediocre (at best) doesn’t help. Wentz couldn’t hit water if he fell out of a boat last night. I take that back, he was quite accurate if the target was between the numbers of Bills d backs.

If you say so. I saw him being rushed a lot, and seeing ghosts and passing as such.

 

[state of hockey]

Don’t get me wrong I don’t think Cousins suddenly makes them a contender.

 

[Bronco]

Cousins can not be worse than last night.