Kepler
Si certus es dubita
Re: NFL 2017: With Dollar Signs in Goodell's Eyes
Yes. Plus defenselessness is like a thought crime applied to the DB. How can the onus of making that determination about the receiver be placed on the defender? It starts out as subjective.
You later sum it up perfectly: define legal and illegal contact objectively. If necessary, prohibit more types of hits to protect people, but don't turn it into a guessing game (if for no other reason than the receiver will then immediately start gaming legal contact).
I still hate the "defenseless receiver" inconsistency. If the guy catches it, and gets blown up, it's OK. But if he doesn't catch it, then it's a penalty.
Yes. Plus defenselessness is like a thought crime applied to the DB. How can the onus of making that determination about the receiver be placed on the defender? It starts out as subjective.
You later sum it up perfectly: define legal and illegal contact objectively. If necessary, prohibit more types of hits to protect people, but don't turn it into a guessing game (if for no other reason than the receiver will then immediately start gaming legal contact).