MinnesotaNorthStar
Minding the gap
Re: NFL 2010: Now Extended By Two More Posts
How about the ridiculous overturn of Shiancoe's TD?
USCHO Fan Forum
This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
-
The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.
NFL 2010: Now Extended By Two More Posts
- Thread starter The Rube
- Start date
- Status
Twitch Boy
Defacing this tagline is a MAX foul
Re: NFL 2010: Now Extended By Two More Posts
Handyman
Hug someone you care about...
Re: NFL 2010: Now Extended By Two More Posts
The Packers have Denny Green Part Deux and they still won
The Packers have Denny Green Part Deux and they still won
state of hockey
He fixes the cable?
I agree that it should have been challenged, but you do realize that none of what you said makes it a good call right?
Re: NFL 2010: Now Extended By Two More Posts
Fail Fail Fail FAVRE!
But that's ok. He lost because of [arm/ankle/text message debacle/insert excuse here].
Ok, being truthful, that may have been the reason. The Packers weren't stopping anything.
The hilarious thing is that SOMEONE has to win the NFC North. Who will it be? Who will fight for the right to exit in the first round of the playoffs?
Fail Fail Fail FAVRE!
But that's ok. He lost because of [arm/ankle/text message debacle/insert excuse here].
Ok, being truthful, that may have been the reason. The Packers weren't stopping anything.
The hilarious thing is that SOMEONE has to win the NFC North. Who will it be? Who will fight for the right to exit in the first round of the playoffs?
WeWantMore
New member
Re: NFL 2010: Now Extended By Two More Posts
I think it's only ridiculous because it kind of went against NFL precedent, it seemed pretty clear to me that the ball hit the ground and turned over a bit.
I think it's only ridiculous because it kind of went against NFL precedent, it seemed pretty clear to me that the ball hit the ground and turned over a bit.
K7776S2001
Go Sioux
Re: NFL 2010: Now Extended By Two More Posts
It was the wrong call. Nothing you say makes it correct. Believe what you like. Whether or not the incompetent coach challenges it or not doesn't make the call right.
It was the wrong call. Nothing you say makes it correct. Believe what you like. Whether or not the incompetent coach challenges it or not doesn't make the call right.
WeWantMore
New member
Re: NFL 2010: Now Extended By Two More Posts
See, I don't think so. Whoever wins it, and I think the Packers definitely have to be the slight favorites, will get the 3 seed for the playoffs due to the crappiness of the West. Then, it's a 6 seed at home in January. I'd feel decent about my chances if I was in Chicago or Green Bay and had a home game in the cold.
See, I don't think so. Whoever wins it, and I think the Packers definitely have to be the slight favorites, will get the 3 seed for the playoffs due to the crappiness of the West. Then, it's a 6 seed at home in January. I'd feel decent about my chances if I was in Chicago or Green Bay and had a home game in the cold.
Dirty
#BanBiddy
Re: NFL 2010: Now Extended By Two More Posts
Just as it seems pretty clear to me that you were drunk while viewing that play. That was a touchdown.
Just as it seems pretty clear to me that you were drunk while viewing that play. That was a touchdown.
WeWantMore
New member
Re: NFL 2010: Now Extended By Two More Posts
It was definitely the wrong call, however, you can't fault the back judge there, he was totally screened by the players.
Contrast that to the Harvin TD, where the official had the best view in the stadium, and still messed it up.
It was definitely the wrong call, however, you can't fault the back judge there, he was totally screened by the players.
Contrast that to the Harvin TD, where the official had the best view in the stadium, and still messed it up.
Handyman
Hug someone you care about...
Re: NFL 2010: Now Extended By Two More Posts
The cold has been proven to do nothing anymore when it comes to the North and HF advantage.
The cold has been proven to do nothing anymore when it comes to the North and HF advantage.
K7776S2001
Go Sioux
Re: NFL 2010: Now Extended By Two More Posts
No argument but the lame argument that not challenging makes it correct is laughable.
No argument but the lame argument that not challenging makes it correct is laughable.
WeWantMore
New member
Re: NFL 2010: Now Extended By Two More Posts
Right now that 6 spot is Tampa or New Orleans, a Florida team and a dome team. You don't think that would affect them at all?
Right now that 6 spot is Tampa or New Orleans, a Florida team and a dome team. You don't think that would affect them at all?
MinnesotaNorthStar
Minding the gap
Re: NFL 2010: Now Extended By Two More Posts
No, it was clear that he maintained possession the entire way. That's a TD.
WeWantMore
New member
Re: NFL 2010: Now Extended By Two More Posts
KFAN quotes from Childress: "Worst officiated game I've seen."
"They hadn't made a call all night, and then they suddenly call a facemask on Loadholt at the end."
Because that wasn't a facemask Brad?
KFAN quotes from Childress: "Worst officiated game I've seen."
"They hadn't made a call all night, and then they suddenly call a facemask on Loadholt at the end."
Because that wasn't a facemask Brad?
Dirty
#BanBiddy
Re: NFL 2010: Now Extended By Two More Posts
I'm not sure it was. He got him under the chin without touching the helmet, is that still considered facemasking? But the officials did suck. The refs sure did love UND and the Vikings this weekend!
I'm not sure it was. He got him under the chin without touching the helmet, is that still considered facemasking? But the officials did suck. The refs sure did love UND and the Vikings this weekend!
Handyman
Hug someone you care about...
Re: NFL 2010: Now Extended By Two More Posts
No it was, it was blatant, the problem is they had ignored stuff like that for both teams all game...kinda a bad spot (if you are the coach) to finally own up and call one ya know. It is like when the WCHA official ignores holding all game then callls one with 2 minutes left in a tie game...sure it probably was one but **** man why grow a sack now?
why was it not a penalty when Mathews took his helmet off, during play, on the field? As far back as I remember taking your helmet off is a 15 yarder. Not that it matters I am just asking.
No it was, it was blatant, the problem is they had ignored stuff like that for both teams all game...kinda a bad spot (if you are the coach) to finally own up and call one ya know. It is like when the WCHA official ignores holding all game then callls one with 2 minutes left in a tie game...sure it probably was one but **** man why grow a sack now?
why was it not a penalty when Mathews took his helmet off, during play, on the field? As far back as I remember taking your helmet off is a 15 yarder. Not that it matters I am just asking.
bronconick
Yep, still here
Re: NFL 2010: Now Extended By Two More Posts
It's pretty clear that he didn't complete the process of a catch in the end zone before the ball touched the ground.
It'd be pretty awful to lose a game that way. Oh. Right.
It's pretty clear that he didn't complete the process of a catch in the end zone before the ball touched the ground.
It'd be pretty awful to lose a game that way. Oh. Right.
jmh
win or lose, we booze
Re: NFL 2010: Now Extended By Two More Posts
I was wondering the same thing, that was tremendously odd.
- Status