Finally saw The Great Escape. It is Good.
I just watched Chasing Ghosts which is about many of the same people in King of Kong only it covers the story of all the original record holders and where they are now. Yeah...wow.
BTW Bill Mitchell is a ****** in this one too![]()
Yeah, it was shot pretty, but ick, the whole movie just didn't have any flow or continuation going on with it at all other than Nick Cage rides a bike and has a flaming skull sometimes. Had some potential, but dang, they should have scrapped it and came out with another scripted to shoot for it.Ghost Rider: Spirit Of Vengeance
I liked the first one alot (for what it was) and was looking forward to this one. About all I can say is that minus a couple funny lines, it was similar to Michael J Fox filming an Oliver Stone acid-trip. Don't bother.
Yeah, it was shot pretty, but ick, the whole movie just didn't have any flow or continuation going on with it at all other than Nick Cage rides a bike and has a flaming skull sometimes. Had some potential, but dang, they should have scrapped it and came out with another scripted to shoot for it.
They got really fancy with the camera for a lot of the action shots, but it was distracting.Shot pretty? It was shot horrible. And I thought The Blair Witch Project was filmed in a jumpy fashion. And I LIKED that movie.
They got really fancy with the camera for a lot of the action shots, but it was distracting.
I don't think bigmrg got your Michael J. Fox reference...
I just watched Stanley Kubrick's Lolita. You can really tell the era in which it was made on a couple accounts. I expected it to be a bit grittier, based upon Kubrick's earlier works that I've seen (Full Metal Jacket, Clockwork Orange, and the Shining). Then I thought about it being his second movie and it made more sense. Also, the six-month pregnant Lolita takes a sip from a cup of coffee she had intended to drink in total, and accepts and begins drinking a beer only a couple minutes later.
I recorded the Sergio Leone/Eastwood man with no name trilogy today. I have watched Clint since I can remember (not only is my dad a huge fan but he's a spittin Doppleganger) but we all have classics that we've watched and classics that we've "watched" and there's a distict difference. I am only part-way through "For a Few Dollars More" but I've gained another level of appreciation for the films than I had before if that seems even possible given when they were made. Truly remarkable and they have far more depth than a cheap glance may provide.
Ditto, but until I got older, I couldn't appreciate what Eastwood's movies really were, and how good they were. As a little Billy/Johnny, they were just cowboy movies to me.
Exactly the point I was trying to get at. Great movies and always engaging, but there was more depth than I recognized until fairly recently.
That movie completely blew people away. Very few movies have had that sort of effect, where they change minds about what a film can do.For me, the original "Night Of The Living Dead" was indeed shocking, given when it was made. That was an outstanding movie, and horrific, if you take the era into account.