Not that anyone caresbut part of my Neflix queue:
Tell No One Foreign
Glengarry Glen Ross Drama
The Girlfriend Experience Independent
Raiders of the Lost Ark Action & Adventure
The Strangers Thrillers
Superman II Action & Adventure
Il Divo Foreign
Rear Window Classics
Yellow Drama
One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest Classics
Portishead: Music & Musicals
Close Encounters of the Third Kind Sci-Fi & Fantasy
Stalag 17 Classics
Midnight Express Drama
The Red Violin Drama
Tropic Thunder:
After an hour, I shut it off. Many of you know my tastes in movies, and even know of some of the movies that don't exactly fit my viewing profile. That says something.
Um, I guess Robert Downey Jr was decent, given what he had to work with......yeah, that's all I got.
Oh my lord we agree on something! That movie was painfully stupid! And not the good stupid, the "why did I waste time on watching this piece of crap" stupid! (minus Tom Cruise)
Usually I only expect to read things that ridiculously stupid from Handyman.
Well speak of the devil.
TT was horrible. The concept was good, but the execution was not. It wasn't even close.
Wanna watch a *ing incredible movie? Watch "Doubt."
Meryl Streep's performance commands your attention in every way. There'll be a shot of her just sitting there, and you're waiting for her to do something. And then she might do nothing, and you're still impressed. That's how good she was in this movie.
And of course, PSH is awesome, but that's obvious. And he still wasn't as good as Streep in this movie. I don't even know if it was that close.
I remember a buddy telling me, after watching "Falling Down," comparing it to a box of cereal, that Michael Douglas was the name on the cereal box, but Robert Duvall was the cereal in the box, the substance you want. Well, I see PSH's name on the box, but the contents were all Streep.
The story is great, the seeds they plant in the audience about the story are better. The settings were somehow cold yet inviting, which added to the different views a person might have of the situation at hand. And, if you've ever attended Catholic/private school, it will have an additional effect on you, even though standards/times have changed since the setting of this movie (1964 was the setting).
Simply awesome movie. This has definite repeat viewing capability, due to the questions left unanswered.
It was an excellent movie. I agree with you for the most part except for the repeat viewing. People will have to watch and make up their own mind on that one, I'd give it away if I said why.
Streep is the film. No Doubt about that.![]()
I've been watching Frost/Nixon over the past week and really enjoying it.
I guess helping Nixon write his book is where she learned how to lob softball questions at people.It was great -- extremely well-acted. But my favorite part is how Diane Sawyer is such a weasel-eyed little rat-fink.![]()
Frost/Nixon is on my list. I consider it a must-see.
I'm debating whether to see that at a real theater as a matinee ($5), or wait until it hits the $2, second-run theaters in town.Saw 2012. Almost surreally terrible, except for the CGI, which was amazing.
I'm debating whether to see that at a real theater as a matinee ($5), or wait until it hits the $2, second-run theaters in town.
I knew it'd be bad, but the effects are probably enough to get me to see it.
Frank Langella as Richard Nixon
(GLM.......looking in your direction).