AldenPartridge1819
New member
Re: Nescac 2010-11
Then why does the wording say, "At that point, the process begins anew (returning to the first criteria) with the remaining teams." ??
I am reading it that if all teams win both games this weekend, Williams will be eliminated from a three-way, and then Midd would win a tie-breaker with Hamilton.
I see your point, but I am just reading it differently. I guess we'll have to wait and see how it all turns out.
You are the math guy, though, so I bet you're right. I did see that whoever runs this website took it the same way I did: nescachockey.wordpress.com
The first tie breaker is record among the tied teams. If Midd, Williams, and Hamilton are tied, the records are Ham 1-0-1. Midd 0-0-2, Williams 0-1-1. That separates everybody. The separates clause means that in a multiple way tie, if you get something that divides the field, but doesn't resolve everything, then you go back with the teams still tied. If you had a four way tie, you would go until either one team is on top or somebody is on the bottom, or the group is split.
Then why does the wording say, "At that point, the process begins anew (returning to the first criteria) with the remaining teams." ??
I am reading it that if all teams win both games this weekend, Williams will be eliminated from a three-way, and then Midd would win a tie-breaker with Hamilton.
I see your point, but I am just reading it differently. I guess we'll have to wait and see how it all turns out.
You are the math guy, though, so I bet you're right. I did see that whoever runs this website took it the same way I did: nescachockey.wordpress.com
Last edited: