Re: Nescac 2009/2010
I would hesitate to call Colby a top-3 team in the NESCAC at this point, but maybe I'm just pessimistic. At this point, Williams looks dominate, Tufts much improved, not to mention that Middlebury, Trinity, and Amherst are lurking in the standings
Still, as other posters have said, there seems to be greater parity in the NESCAC this year than the past. Given that, and from the games I've seen, I would say Colby has a competitive chance to win any of its conference games, and could finish in the top-3. Unlike last year, this team doesn't quit when facing a 2-0 deficit, or when they have a 3-0 lead.
I would hesitate to call Colby a top-3 team in the NESCAC at this point, but maybe I'm just pessimistic. At this point, Williams looks dominate, Tufts much improved, not to mention that Middlebury, Trinity, and Amherst are lurking in the standings
Still, as other posters have said, there seems to be greater parity in the NESCAC this year than the past. Given that, and from the games I've seen, I would say Colby has a competitive chance to win any of its conference games, and could finish in the top-3. Unlike last year, this team doesn't quit when facing a 2-0 deficit, or when they have a 3-0 lead.