solovsfett
Registered User
Scorsese was not a producer. Originally he was going to but The Irishman made that impossible.
Thanks. The Irishman I think is out in October, can’t wait!
Scorsese was not a producer. Originally he was going to but The Irishman made that impossible.
Thanks. The Irishman I think is out in October, can’t wait!
Gonna be a big 4th quarter for movies, and I'll include It: Chapter Two just because, even though that is still 3rd quarter.
The Irishman
Breaking Bad movie
Star Wars
Joker
Zombieland: Double Tap
Terminator: Dark Fate
Ford Vs Ferrari
Frozen 2
Beautiful Day In The Neighborhood
Little Women
Ford Vs Ferrari
please tell mookie this is ford fairlaine 2![]()
I think its LeMans back when Ford when big into endurance racing to win LeMans.
If they show the cars of that era with the natural sound, bring earplugs.
Jumanji 2
The remake was cute and all but do we really need this? Also it has Akwqkwkqafina in case there was any doubt about it being a bad idea.
Do we need any movie?
The remake was cute and all but do we really need this?
Well, Hollywood has no new ideas... That's the obvious point here. They keep trying to play the nostalgia card because they think that's the most efficient way to cash in, but that well is already starting to show signs of running dry.
Todays news about FACE/OFF being redone is a perfect example of a reboot that absolutely no one is asking for. That movie has it's original cult status simply because it has Nick Cage and John Travolta both at their peak 90's weirdness along with John Woo doing his unique style behind the camera.
By themselves, all of those things are horrible. But when they combine, the vortex of suck manages to pull you in and you are fascinated by a movie that makes absolutely no sense plot-wise. By trying to do this, you may as well just build a DARK KNIGHT pile of money and light it up like the Joker did...
If these did not make $Texas at the box office Hollywood would stop remaking/rebooting/reimagining these movies. Studios can produce this content cheaply and if a film doesn't do gangbusters it still breaks even. Death Wish was absolute garbage, but it made $50M on a $30M budget. Overboard was a success since it only cost $12M to make but made $90M. If it takes off like Jumanji ($950M on a $100M budget) then they get to swim in vaults of cash like Scrooge McDuck.
As long as that keeps happening, why would Hollywood stop?
Todays news about FACE/OFF being redone is a perfect example of a reboot that absolutely no one is asking for. That movie has it's original cult status simply because it has Nick Cage and John Travolta both playing themselves amped up to over 9000, along with John Woo doing his unique style behind the camera.
Well, FACE/OFF seems like it could be a $90-100m budget that will make $50m. Do that enough and this crap will stop. We're starting to see IP's where this is possible coming through the pipes now. Like I said, the well is starting to show it may be running dry.
Mary Poppins Returns was actually good, though. I don't mind a sequel if it's GOOD. Remakes are a coin flip at best. And ones that aren't even thought of/asked for/not needed? You're betting a lot. There is ZERO need for a Face/Off remake.
On the flipside, I could SEE how "Gone In 60 Seconds" was remade. Cooler cars, new technology, etc. There was at least a reason.....
Edit: Imagine "Wargames" now....with the technology...I don't want it to happen, but there would be good reason to redo that one...
Studios are more than happy to take that bet. Even the hated Ghostbusters reimagining or whatever it was made $250M on a budget of $145M. You may not like them but studios love the green they make.