What's new
By:
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

MN @ UND: tArrogance vs ___________

cross cheque said:
How did RWD's panties ever come into the conversation? Were you talking about coleman tents or raincoats?

panties.jpg
Click to expand...

I told her not to get hers in a bunch because she was wiggling out on me and she took me literally. Then proceeded to tell me what type she wears. I haven't been able to eat or sleep since.
 
Re: MN @ UND: tArrogance vs ___________

JDUBBS1280 said:
I told her not to get hers in a bunch because she was wiggling out on me and she took me literally. Then proceeded to tell me what type she wears. I haven't been able to eat or sleep since.
Click to expand...

Spending all your time whacking your thirteen-lined ground squirrel to that visual, huh.
 
Re: MN @ UND: tArrogance vs ___________

JDUBBS1280 said:
I told her not to get hers in a bunch because she was wiggling out on me and she took me literally. Then proceeded to tell me what type she wears. I haven't been able to eat or sleep since.
Click to expand...

Nice revisionist history.

Here is the actual exchange:

JDUBBS1280 said:
Why does a debate on an Internet message board get your panties in a bunch?
Click to expand...
So, he doesn't say "don't get your panties in a bunch." He asks why they are in a bunch.

Runninwiththedogs said:
I wear thongs.
Click to expand...
Joking explanation.

JDUBBS1280 said:
Can't fault you for that :)
Click to expand...

Clearly not a disgusted or repulsed response.
 
Runninwiththedogs said:
Nice revisionist history.

Here is the actual exchange:


So, he doesn't say "don't get your panties in a bunch." He asks why they are in a bunch.
Click to expand...

Really, it's that different?

My God are you dense. It's a common expression. You took it literally. Which means you're either incredibly stupid, or just looking to grab attention. My money is on both.

As for my second comment, I was just pushing your buttons because you were annoying the crap out of me. It looks like it worked because you've been on a non-stop whine fest about this here and on Twitter for two days now.
 
Re: MN @ UND: tArrogance vs ___________

JDUBBS1280 said:
Really, it's that different?

My God are you dense. It's a common expression. You took it literally. Which means you're either incredibly stupid, or just looking to grab attention. My money is on both.

As for my second comment, I was just pushing your buttons because you were annoying the crap out of me. It looks like it worked because you've been on a non-stop whine fest about this here and on Twitter for two days now.
Click to expand...

Wow, JDubbs. It is you that is incredibly stupid.

1. I have heard the expression. 2. I made a joke in response to the expression. 3. You enjoyed the joke and/or were aroused by it. 4. You are the one who didn't recognize it was a joke, as were the ensuing responses.

The only thing that isn't a joke is your obsession with me. Stalking me on Twitter, gathering information about me, addressing me by my first name in threads. More than one person has mentioned to me privately that they are concerned about your behavior, and I initially laughed it off, but I have been re-thinking that in the past few days. I never thought I would have to be worried about my personal safety because of some mouth-breathing troglodyte on USCHO, but you have proven that I should be.
 
Re: MN @ UND: tArrogance vs ___________

Dirty said:
And she's met me!
Click to expand...

I can understand and support Dirty's stance. I have also met Dirty, and I have feared for my safety ever since. Let's put it this way: if you were his neighbor, he'd be the "quiet, kept to himself, never bothered anybody" (due to being on the internet so often) type of person. Just sayin'.
 
Re: MN @ UND: tArrogance vs ___________

JDUBBS1280 said:
I told her not to get hers in a bunch because she was wiggling out on me and she took me literally. Then proceeded to tell me what type she wears. I haven't been able to eat or sleep since.
Click to expand...


What did someone say you're doing... squirter porn?

Sounds about right.


There. I'm in with one post. Count me b i t c h e s!

Hey Dubbie...

 
Last edited:
Runninwiththedogs said:
Wow, JDubbs. It is you that is incredibly stupid.

1. I have heard the expression. 2. I made a joke in response to the expression. 3. You enjoyed the joke and/or were aroused by it. 4. You are the one who didn't recognize it was a joke, as were the ensuing responses.

The only thing that isn't a joke is your obsession with me. Stalking me on Twitter, gathering information about me, addressing me by my first name in threads. More than one person has mentioned to me privately that they are concerned about your behavior, and I initially laughed it off, but I have been re-thinking that in the past few days. I never thought I would have to be worried about my personal safety because of some mouth-breathing troglodyte on USCHO, but you have proven that I should be.
Click to expand...

Yet, you're the one who is still dragging this argument on in our game thread. Yeah, you were joking :rolleyes:
 
Re: MN @ UND: tArrogance vs ___________

Under the circumstances, I think this should be a very interesting (maybe telling would be a better word) series. The gophers need to find out if they truly have a different team this year and can win when the games have some added significance. The team formerly known as Sioux need to find out if they can hang with a very good team and keep their tournament hopes alive. If the Gophers sweep, good chance the Sioux will be cleaning off their golf clubs in March. If the Sioux sweep, the gophs will still make the tournament, but those character issues from the last several years will be in everyone's mind, and that will be a problem for them.

Back to your regularly scheduled underwear programming.
 
burd said:
Under the circumstances, I think this should be a very interesting (maybe telling would be a better word) series. The gophers need to find out if they truly have a different team this year and can win when the games have some added significance. The team formerly known as Sioux need to find out if they can hang with a very good team and keep their tournament hopes alive. If the Gophers sweep, good chance the Sioux will be cleaning off their golf clubs in March. If the Sioux sweep, the gophs will still make the tournament, but those character issues from the last several years will be in everyone's mind, and that will be a problem for them.

Back to your regularly scheduled underwear programming.
Click to expand...

I think this series is big for both team's tournament aspirations. The Gophers don't feel like the tournament lock they did a month ago.
 
Re: MN @ UND: tArrogance vs ___________

A split seems likely given history and the whole hated rivalry thing.
 
Re: MN @ UND: tArrogance vs ___________

ScoobyDoo said:
UND Sweeps.
Click to expand...

Be nice, but really don't see that happening, Scooby, unless Dell is in a zone. The gophers will dominate periods of this series, how much remains to be seen. But UND doesn't have the horses to dominate UMinn at this point.
 
Re: MN @ UND: tArrogance vs ___________

ScoobyDoo said:
UND Sweeps.
Click to expand...

If UMTC comes out slow as they have earlier in the season on Friday nights UND has a chance but I have a feeling since this is a rivalry game they will come out hot. Saturday seems like a gimme for UMTC with their series trends. There, now we are both sandbagging.
 
Re: MN @ UND: tArrogance vs ___________

I heard the coaches interview with Hackstol on wednesday, but was wondering if anyone has an inside track on injuries for UND. I know rodwell will be out for the season and Rocco will not be suiting up this weekend either (will he ever?) but what about the rest?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top