MN/BSU: WCHA Playoffs: Nothing To See Here, NO INNUENDO! Giggity.

[gopher wes]

Re: MN/BSU: WCHA Playoffs: Nothing To See Here, NO INNUENDO! Giggity.

Ah, so what you're saying is we have the stamina to go for at least four rounds?

Absolutely. I disappointed you had to ask that question!

 

[Driftryder]

Re: MN/BSU: WCHA Playoffs: Nothing To See Here, NO INNUENDO! Giggity.

Getting the Beavers spread out on the larger ice sheet should be a big benefit for the Gophers, easier to score that way.

 

[Brick Tamland]

Re: MN/BSU: WCHA Playoffs: Nothing To See Here, NO INNUENDO! Giggity.

This thread kinda stinks... yet I am curiously attracted to it...hmm....odd.

 

[Slap Shot]

Re: MN/BSU: WCHA Playoffs: Nothing To See Here, NO INNUENDO! Giggity.

The first rule is, you don't talk about Fight Club.
The second rule is, YOU DON'T TALK ABOUT FIGHT CLUB.

(Really? You haven't seen it? It's pure awesome)

I've seen the movie (which sucked btw) and understood the reference, but I do not know what, "is not being talked about" here.

 

[dxmnkd316]

Re: MN/BSU: WCHA Playoffs: Nothing To See Here, NO INNUENDO! Giggity.

Getting the Beavers spread out on the larger ice sheet should be a big benefit for the Gophers, easier to score that way.

Yeah, but if it's all torn up, scoring may be the least of your worries.

 

[Biddco]

Re: MN/BSU: WCHA Playoffs: Nothing To See Here, NO INNUENDO! Giggity.

This thread kinda stinks... yet I am curiously attracted to it...hmm....odd.

Great innuendo

 

[state of hockey]

Re: MN/BSU: WCHA Playoffs: Nothing To See Here, NO INNUENDO! Giggity.

Apparently some gopher fans care more about little boys than Beavers

CRIPES.

I swear the jerk has to be from Coon Rapids at least 50% of the time with these stories.

 

[burd]

Re: MN/BSU: WCHA Playoffs: Nothing To See Here, NO INNUENDO! Giggity.

A warning to Beaver fans in this thread: gopher fans will always try to get innuendo.

 

[state of hockey]

Re: MN/BSU: WCHA Playoffs: Nothing To See Here, NO INNUENDO! Giggity.

A warning to Beaver fans in this thread: gopher fans will always try to get innuendo.

HAHAHA! Nice work!


Beaver fans. BAHAHAHAHA!

 

[SCSU Euro]

Re: MN/BSU: WCHA Playoffs: Nothing To See Here, NO INNUENDO! Giggity.

Apparently some gopher fans care more about little boys than Beavers

Is it me or does that guy look like if Mazzocco went on a vicious drug bender?

I've seen the movie (which sucked btw) )

Blasphemy! "You met me at a very strange time in my life." Second best closing line of a movie ever.

 

[Stauber1]

Re: MN/BSU: WCHA Playoffs: Nothing To See Here, NO INNUENDO! Giggity.

Is it me or does that guy look like if Mazzocco went on a vicious drug bender?

It's you.

 

[Golden Tuuk]

Re: MN/BSU: WCHA Playoffs: Nothing To See Here, NO INNUENDO! Giggity.

Yawn.

 

[SanTropez]

Re: MN/BSU: WCHA Playoffs: Nothing To See Here, NO INNUENDO! Giggity.

Yeah, not sure how just our fan base are the ones that got suspended, but I am pretty sure jan needed a TO for menstruating all over the board.

You aren't kidding, wow are they a bunch of whiny little girls.

What was really awesome though was watching them try to back track, after the news that Motzko had not wanted the Mac in Wisconsin in the first place. Their inner Jan really shines through.

 

[Steve_MN]

Re: MN/BSU: WCHA Playoffs: Nothing To See Here, NO INNUENDO! Giggity.

What's the over/under on pages before this thread gets zapped?

 

[SanTropez]

Re: MN/BSU: WCHA Playoffs: Nothing To See Here, NO INNUENDO! Giggity.

What's the over/under on pages before this thread gets zapped?

This is pretty tame compared to last weeks threads.

 

[Tipsy McStagger]

Re: MN/BSU: WCHA Playoffs: Nothing To See Here, NO INNUENDO! Giggity.

You aren't kidding, wow are they a bunch of whiny little girls.

What was really awesome though was watching them try to back track, after the news that Motzko had not wanted the Mac in Wisconsin in the first place. Their inner Jan really shines through.

Get a life, dude. None of the fans knew, none of the players even knew that Motzko/administration had made the decision to have the cup presented the following weekend if we won it. Hindsight is 20/20. Easy to say now that all the information is out there.

"What was really awesome though was watching them try to back track, after the news that Motzko had not wanted the Mac in Wisconsin in the first place. Their inner Jan really shines through." So what was really awesome was not your team winning a share of the cup, it was our fans "backtracking". But we're Jan. D'ohkay.

 

[SanTropez]

Re: MN/BSU: WCHA Playoffs: Nothing To See Here, NO INNUENDO! Giggity.

Get a life, dude. None of the fans knew, none of the players even knew that Motzko/administration had made the decision to have the cup presented the following weekend if we won it. Hindsight is 20/20. Easy to say now that all the information is out there.

"What was really awesome though was watching them try to back track, after the news that Motzko had not wanted the Mac in Wisconsin in the first place. Their inner Jan really shines through." So what was really awesome was not your team winning a share of the cup, it was our fans "backtracking". But we're Jan. D'ohkay.

Was talking about the awesome on these boards but keep reaching, Jan.

 

[Gurtholfin]

Re: MN/BSU: WCHA Playoffs: Nothing To See Here, NO INNUENDO! Giggity.

Was talking about the awesome on these boards but keep reaching, Jan.

Not sure you learned anything from your time in the corner.

 

[Tipsy McStagger]

Re: MN/BSU: WCHA Playoffs: Nothing To See Here, NO INNUENDO! Giggity.

Was talking about the awesome on these boards but keep reaching, Jan.

Yeah, it sure was awesome how you made 7 or 8 Jan/Marcia posts. Keep up the good work.

 

[JDUBBS1280]

Re: MN/BSU: WCHA Playoffs: Nothing To See Here, NO INNUENDO! Giggity.

Hoping the Gophers can take care of business in two games. Playing on the big sheet will certainly be in their favor. Hopefully Bjugstad stays hot heading into the tourney.