Kepler
Si certus es dubita
PECOTA projections.
Is it possible for the winner to be *below* .500?
We almost did it because of course we did.
And to prove what a crapshoot short series are, we then beat the Reds and led the A's 3-2 with Seaver and Matlack going to the hill.
St Louis actually won the Series after only winning 83 games in 2006. They had to beat... ahem ... a Mets team that finished 16 games better than them (and was 4-2 against them during the regular season) to get to the Series.
They’re about 10 games too optimistic on the Tigers. They’re not improving 22 games by signing Schoop, Cron and Nova.
My wife and I were in Vegas a couple weekends back for the Fortress Tournament since Cornell was there. We were in the MGM Signature so we walked a lot through the MGM Grand to get to other places. They had a kiosk where Pete Rose was signing autographs. Note this wasn't on the actual casino floor, this way waaaaay off of it where there were just a couple gift shops and a some fast food spots. Like, one of the very empty parts of the whole complex. And they still had a guy out in the walkway trying to get people to (I'm assuming) pay for autographs and I didn't see anyone in there the whole weekend. But that's what happened when you violate the basic integrity of the sport.
One of only two teams to get a straight zero in both raw and adjusted playoff percentage.
I like that they're projected above the Royals, but even KC has playoff hopes (0.1%) while the Tigers have none.
I'm okay with expanded playoffs if the season cuts back. 150 games sound right? Maybe 140?
154 was good enough for George Washington and Jesus Christ.
Move the Dodgers back to Brooklyn and my father would be thrilled with this.
I'm surprised there has been no ML team in CT since IIRC Hartford in the 19th C. (fun fact: Mark Twain's favorite team).