What's new
By:
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

Minnesota @ Wisconsin: Secondary Rivalry, Just As Much Hatred

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: Minnesota @ Wisconsin: Secondary Rivalry, Just As Much Hatred

mariucci said:
Without hyjacking this thread into another pointless debate
Click to expand...


Oh, you mean another pointless debate that you and/or your clone Dubber starts and then tries to move away from without allowing for rebuttal? You mean one of those debates?
 
Gurtholfin said:
Oh, you mean another pointless debate that you and/or your clone Dubber starts and then tries to move away from without allowing for rebuttal? You mean one of those debates?
Click to expand...

No, the kind where evidence is presented to support an argument, you ignore it, then continue to try and rebuttal with nothing but opinion and conjecture.
 
Re: Minnesota @ Wisconsin: Secondary Rivalry, Just As Much Hatred

JDUBBS1280 said:
No, the kind where evidence is presented to support an argument, you ignore it, then continue to try and rebuttal with nothing but opinion and conjecture.
Click to expand...

Gurtholfin said:
Oh, you mean another pointless debate that you and/or your clone Dubber starts and then tries to move away from without allowing for rebuttal? You mean one of those debates?
Click to expand...

You two sound like a bickering husband and wife.

What I want to know is what goalie Eaves will select to be Fridays victim: Rumpel-Let's-The-Pucks-In or the other guy.
 
Re: Minnesota @ Wisconsin: Secondary Rivalry, Just As Much Hatred

Gurtholfin said:
Oh, you mean another pointless debate that you and/or your clone Dubber starts and then tries to move away from without allowing for rebuttal? You mean one of those debates?
Click to expand...

Wow kid, you remind me of a bullheaded young Viking fan so full of Packer hate and testosterone that an openminded discussion is absolutely out of the question.

You have been incessantly debating this subject for the past couple weeks, and the reason I posted this link was so that possibly you would learn something about the sport you follow without the chip on your shoulder.
 
Go4PuckFan2.0 said:
You two sound like a bickering husband and wife.

What I want to know is what goalie Eaves will select to be Fridays victim: Rumpel-Let's-The-Pucks-In or the other guy.
Click to expand...

I answered that the first time you asked. Still hasn't been announced yet, and may be a game time decision on Saturday.
 
Last edited:
Re: Minnesota @ Wisconsin: Secondary Rivalry, Just As Much Hatred

I have no qualms about saying the Badgers just don't have it this year. It happens. I expect very little in this weekend's series. (Yeah, flame me if you like.)

That said, I will not become a Gofer bandwagoner. I would love the Badgers to surprise me. That said, I'm sticking with the WMU Broncos.
 
Re: Minnesota @ Wisconsin: Secondary Rivalry, Just As Much Hatred

BadgerAlum@WMU said:
I have no qualms about saying the Badgers just don't have it this year. It happens. I expect very little in this weekend's series. (Yeah, flame me if you like.)

That said, I will not become a Gofer bandwagoner. I would love the Badgers to surprise me. That said, I'm sticking with the WMU Broncos.
Click to expand...
This one sounds like a traitor to me, BADger fans:p
 
Re: Minnesota @ Wisconsin: Secondary Rivalry, Just As Much Hatred

JDUBBS1280 said:
You don't need much patience when you're the premiere program in college hockey ;)
Click to expand...

:) Brings to mind these lines from The Emperor's New Clothes:

I like the way I look
My looks I like a lot
I heartily dislike
Whatever I am not

The guy was naked as a jaybird, of course.
 
Re: Minnesota @ Wisconsin: Secondary Rivalry, Just As Much Hatred

burd said:
:) Brings to mind these lines from The Emperor's New Clothes:

I like the way I look
My looks I like a lot
I heartily dislike
Whatever I am not

The guy was naked as a jaybird, of course.
Click to expand...

Watch out as the Dubber is going to show you FACTS that the emperor is in fact wearing maroon and gold. ;):D
 
Re: Minnesota @ Wisconsin: Secondary Rivalry, Just As Much Hatred

Any of you Sconnie folk make it out here last weekend for sex-partner opener?

I want a sweep, but I'd be happy with a split.
 
Re: Minnesota @ Wisconsin: Secondary Rivalry, Just As Much Hatred

This little anecdote about the gophers. Mostly true.

Years ago, I took my wife, who is from non-hockey country and has no interest in the game, to dinner at a GF restaurant. While we were eating, the entire gopher hockey team came in and sat close by. I pointed them out to her, and I have to confess that I expressed my admiration and respect for the fact that the team was made up entirely of Minnesota kids. She commented on how small they were but good looking, in a kind of feminine way. I explained it has always been that way--the gophers have good looking players and ugly fans, while the Sioux and Badgers have ugly players and good looking fans. She thought that made sense. I've always thought that might be the source of some of the tension that exists among the three groups.
 
Chuck Schwartz said:
Did you guys know that Herb Brooks coached the Miracle on Ice! He was a Gopher! And Coached them too!
Click to expand...

Sure did. Did you know that has nothing to do with the ongoing argument, and that it is your boy G-Spot that is trying to give us the history lesson on our program?

Tell him not to bring the topic up again unless he has something concrete to support his ridiculous, asinine claims (which will be impossible by the way) and you won't see this discussion anymore ;)
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top