What's new
By:
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

:) Minnesota @ Michigan: 3/14 3/15...Only Need Two

Re: :) Minnesota @ Michigan: 3/14 3/15...Only Need Two

Brenthoven said:
I have not heard anything, which probably means it's not going to be good news.

As for the series, I could see MN coming out strong on Friday night, winning the game and the conference, and then just mailing it in on Saturday since the game won't matter one bit.
Click to expand...
Certainly hope he's doing good. And I have to disagree in part about Saturday. While I agree that if they win on Friday, some of the urgency will be gone, they're still playing to lock up the #1 seed in the NCAA tournament.

B1G tournament tailgate, T minus 7 days and counting.
 
Re: :) Minnesota @ Michigan: 3/14 3/15...Only Need Two

I was out of town last weekend and only got to watch bits and pieces of the Saturday game.....when and how did Warning get hurt?
 
Re: :) Minnesota @ Michigan: 3/14 3/15...Only Need Two

gopher wes said:
I was out of town last weekend and only got to watch bits and pieces of the Saturday game.....when and how did Warning get hurt?
Click to expand...

Wes, what gives? Just because it's Thursday it doesn't mean we HAVE to talk hockey. There is still lots of mocking and ridiculing of MI fans to be done. :) :D
 
Re: :) Minnesota @ Michigan: 3/14 3/15...Only Need Two

Tiggsy said:
Wes, what gives? Just because it's Thursday it doesn't mean we HAVE to talk hockey. There is still lots of mocking and ridiculing of MI fans to be done. :) :D
Click to expand...
My bad.

"Ugly helmets are ugly" (C) the stupid GPL thread. Muck Fichigan. I never knew Michigan fans were as whiny as SUCS fans. How does it feel to be on the NCAA bubble and out of contention for the B1G regular season championship? Does anyone know how many wins Penn St has in conference and who those wins came against?

How am I doing, Tiggs?:D
 
Re: :) Minnesota @ Michigan: 3/14 3/15...Only Need Two

gopher wes said:
My bad.

"Ugly helmets are ugly" (C) the stupid GPL thread. Muck Fichigan. I never knew Michigan fans were as whiny as SUCS fans. How does it feel to be on the NCAA bubble and out of contention for the B1G regular season championship? Does anyone know how many wins Penn St has in conference and who those wins came against?

How am I doing, Tiggs?:D
Click to expand...

Nice! Covered it all in a single post. I guess you can actually talk about the series now that you've pulled your weight.
:)
 
Re: :) Minnesota @ Michigan: 3/14 3/15...Only Need Two

alfablue said:
So this is a hockey board, one would expect to talk hockey.

But threads seem to be more about insults and patting each other (where, you can decide). As if the posters have any influence on the games, or as if posters gain or lose something based on the outcome. I hate to break it to you- nothing changes based on the outcome.

If I say we are better than you because we have 9 NC's, you will naturally come back that it's been 16 years since our last, and that you've gotten two since then. bla bla bla. And at the end of that agurment, we boths still have the same job, the same significant other (or not), and the same prospect of some kind of betterment as before the argument and before the game.

If something bad or good happens in the game- you didn't make it happen anymore than I did. Take credit or place blame all you want- none of us are lacing up skates.

But if you feel better bantering among yourselves, ok. You don't need us, and we don't want to be here- win, win.

have fun.
Click to expand...

These sound like the words of a fan of a struggling program.

Important series for Michigan. They need at least a win to keep from sliding down the bubble. I'm guessing they will be a bit more disciplined this time around, meaning landing crosschecks to the sternum and spine rather than the throat and trying to limit individual misconducts to only one rather than all the games in the series.
 
Re: :) Minnesota @ Michigan: 3/14 3/15...Only Need Two

gopher wes said:
I was out of town last weekend and only got to watch bits and pieces of the Saturday game.....when and how did Warning get hurt?
Click to expand...

I'm pretty sure it was during Fridays game and he missed the whole Saturday game. They put Isackson in the lineup instead.

I didn't really see it happen but saw him skate from behind the offensive net back to the bench hurting.
 
alfablue said:
So this is a hockey board, one would expect to talk hockey.

But threads seem to be more about insults and patting each other (where, you can decide). As if the posters have any influence on the games, or as if posters gain or lose something based on the outcome. I hate to break it to you- nothing changes based on the outcome.

If I say we are better than you because we have 9 NC's, you will naturally come back that it's been 16 years since our last, and that you've gotten two since then. bla bla bla. And at the end of that agurment, we boths still have the same job, the same significant other (or not), and the same prospect of some kind of betterment as before the argument and before the game.

If something bad or good happens in the game- you didn't make it happen anymore than I did. Take credit or place blame all you want- none of us are lacing up skates.

But if you feel better bantering among yourselves, ok. You don't need us, and we don't want to be here- win, win.

have fun.
Click to expand...

Jeezuz ballz, do you have one fan that isn't a total Sally?

1. The insults aren't serious nor are they personal.
2. What hockey talk did you offer?
3. It's a long week and the talk will happen.

This is not serious business, learn to enjoy the banter and if you spend less time whining the hockey content will follow.
 
Re: :) Minnesota @ Michigan: 3/14 3/15...Only Need Two

Brick Tamland said:
Indeed. I doubt Happy is even happy about being Happy.
Click to expand...

Yeah, I am not going to be Happy with both Minnesota hockey teams being rated number 1, lined up for the number one NCAA seeds, and winning the regular season championships.
 
alfablue said:
Just so I know, what's the schedule when this thread starts talking about hockey?

You know, the game that's between Minnesota and Michigan? There's two of them this weekend. It would be a whole lot more interesting to disucss that.
Click to expand...

I now see why bucky hates them so much...
 
Re: :) Minnesota @ Michigan: 3/14 3/15...Only Need Two

Indeed. Let's hash over the same topic for an entire week. Who needs any light-hearted, tongue-in-cheek banter to break things up along the way. This is serious business, folks. Start acting professionally.
 
Re: :) Minnesota @ Michigan: 3/14 3/15...Only Need Two

Can we break down the PWR, too? 2 weeks in advance is much too short a time to fully analyze an ever-changing status such as the PWR.
 
alfablue said:
So in the old WCHA it was common to just have this kind of posting? Seems like it should be over in the Cafe area, with the lack of any hockey content.
Click to expand...

Minny is bottom of the barrel academically so you're lucky that you do not receive grunts...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top