Re: Minnesota Gophers Season Thread 2015-16
It's a sensationalized piece written by someone who doesn't have a very good understanding of college hockey, its history or in what ways it has changed and what ways it has stayed the same.
Or to put it another way, it's rubbish.
I'm not a huge Lucia fan. If a quality replacement for him was in hand, I would be just fine seeing him fired. But the criticisms levied against him in this article and elsewhere are either of a personal nature or pretty absurd.
The Gophers had so many departures after last season because players don't value the Maroon and Gold and only see the Gophers as a stepping stone? The majority of Div 1 schools probably never would have gotten 3 years out of Skjei, Reilly or even Wilcox. Or 3 from Bjugstad. Not to mention 4 from Rau.
UND develops better NHL and team players because they teach them how to be more lunch pail, while the Gophers teach them how to be prima donnas - and this prima donna complex was evidenced by the Gophers' loss to Union? Didn't the Gophers beat UND to get to that game, and beat them 2 years earlier to go the the FF?
The loss to Union was an embarrassment? Really? Everyone who could tell their ******* from a hole in the ground saw the Gophers as underdogs in that game. How about back in the 70's when the Gophers were beat by another small school in the middle of nowhere, Michigan Tech. Was that an embarrassment? How about any of their other NCAA losses to "small" schools like RPI, Providence, St. Lawrence, LSSU, Harvard? The 2012 loss to Yale had to have been an embarrassment. Oh, wait....Yale beat UND too, and by a wider margin. Never mind.
The article seems to want to lay blame at Lucia's feet for the practice of recruiting young players, but ignores the fact that he has been more vocal than anyone about doing away with the 1 thing most responsible for it...the "gentlemen's aggreement."
There is some acknowledgement that a lot of the folks (former players and alum) quoted in the article were put off by Lucia's disregard and disrespect for the alumni community. I get that. I can totally understand disliking Lucia on a personal level. But criticism of his personality shouldn't be conflated with criticism of the program. And the offered criticism of the program just doesn't make sense.
Where criticism of the program does make sense is in the decline of attendance. But I fail to see how you can put the blame on Lucia for that. Attendance has been declining ever since they implemented the mandatory "donations" on season tickets, jacked the price of single-game tickets through the roof, and joined the Big 10. Those were administrative decisions, not coaching ones.