Re: Minnesota Golden Gopher Season 2018-19: The Motzko Era Begins! Pt. 2
THis was part of my point in a long-winded post before the thread switch. I also pointed out that a lot of those programs' fans are questioning their coach's abilities. And I postulated that maybe it is the combo of young age players and recruiting misses from kids recruited when they were young is more the issue than the coaching ability, including the performance of the Gophers under Lucia and Motzko. Yes, there are outliers like Denver, but that is not the mean. And I wouldn't expect these programs to fall near the mean for D1 schools as they still have recruiting advantages (facilities and reputation) over other schools. My point was that I think the days of all these programs consistently making the NCAA and having a shot at the NC might be gone. I would guess they will still make it more often than the 'average' team (especially if the minimum recruiting age does change and coaches make further adjustments to their mix of players they recruit), just expect they will have more down years than in the 80's, 90's and 2000's. And I think we will continue to see more programs not in this group that make up the NCAA field and get some wins in the tourney.
As the article points out blue bloods typically attract the best 17 and 18-year-olds, many of whom have been or will be drafted by NHL teams. What we are seeing this season is the result many smaller schools in the top 20 going after players who will be 21-year-old freshmen. Entering college as a 21-year-old freshman means you’re 24 or 25 by your senior year, depending on your birth date. That means 17 or 18-year-olds going up against 24 or 25-year-olds puts blue bloods at a distinct disadvantage.
The Gophers have typically recruited young and I suspect Motzko will attempt to implement a new strategy over the next couple seasons.
A key in getting the right mix of young and old is identifying those promising late bloomers who have had a couple years in juniors. They’re typically older than average true freshman across the country, but they’re bigger, stronger, faster and more mature. They’re better focused in regards to academics as well.
THis was part of my point in a long-winded post before the thread switch. I also pointed out that a lot of those programs' fans are questioning their coach's abilities. And I postulated that maybe it is the combo of young age players and recruiting misses from kids recruited when they were young is more the issue than the coaching ability, including the performance of the Gophers under Lucia and Motzko. Yes, there are outliers like Denver, but that is not the mean. And I wouldn't expect these programs to fall near the mean for D1 schools as they still have recruiting advantages (facilities and reputation) over other schools. My point was that I think the days of all these programs consistently making the NCAA and having a shot at the NC might be gone. I would guess they will still make it more often than the 'average' team (especially if the minimum recruiting age does change and coaches make further adjustments to their mix of players they recruit), just expect they will have more down years than in the 80's, 90's and 2000's. And I think we will continue to see more programs not in this group that make up the NCAA field and get some wins in the tourney.