What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

Minnesota Girls High School Hockey III

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: Minnesota Girls High School Hockey III

When the MSHSL declared there wasn't a check from behind in the Privette incident, it immediately made me wonder how healthy her previous spinal cord injury had become .. if she was really ready to be back on the ice. Not to belittle the injury or checking from behind etc, of course, and obviously her doctors cleared her to play, but I still wonder about the condition of the previous problem.
 
Re: Minnesota Girls High School Hockey III

Saw this today . . . isn't checking from behind an AUTOMATIC disqualification in college?? This seems kind of backward . . . ??

http://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/highs...t-paralyzed-falling-164124017.html#more-11188

When the MSHSL declared there wasn't a check from behind in the Privette incident, it immediately made me wonder how healthy her previous spinal cord injury had become .. if she was really ready to be back on the ice. Not to belittle the injury or checking from behind etc, of course, and obviously her doctors cleared her to play, but I still wonder about the condition of the previous problem.
As per the article linked by binnyrus, the mother of Miss Privette intensely disagrees with the findings in the incident report.

The MSHSL response per changes to penalties for infractions of CFB, contact to the head etc.

The Minnesota State High School League Board of Directors has approved a recommendation to stiffen several penalties in hockey that become effective immediately, January 16, 2012.

http://www.mshsl.org/mshsl/index.asp


Checking from behind, which formerly called for a two-minute minor penalty plus a 10-minute misconduct penalty, will now become a five-minute major penalty plus a 10-minute misconduct penalty. The existing also states that any check from behind that is deemed "flagrant or causes the player to crash headfirst into the boards or goal frame" will continue be a game disqualification. The disqualified player cannot re-enter that game and cannot play in the next scheduled game either.

Boarding, defined as a "check, cross-check, elbow, charge or trip" that sends an opponent "violently into the boards" now becomes an automatic major penalty — five minutes — instead of the option of either a two-minute minor penalty or a five-minute major penalty. The existing rule that also states that any boarding check that "causes the player to crash headfirst into the boards" may qualify for a game disqualification. The disqualified player cannot re-enter that game and cannot play in the next scheduled game either.

Contact to the head also now becomes an automatic major penalty — five minutes — instead of the option of either a two-minute minor penalty or a five-minute major penalty. The rule states, "No player shall make contact with an opposing player's head or neck area in any manner." Officials still have the option of assessing a disqualification penalty if warranted, and in that case the disqualified player cannot re-enter that game and cannot play in the next scheduled game either.

Really puts the onus on officials obviously...to get it right. I understand they've recently received some specific, specialized instruction from the MSHSL regarding enforcement of the newly stiffened penalties for these rules violations. Hopefully the changes and officials are extremely effective in preventing any more injuries of this severity. Hopefully at least as effective as the "STOP" signs utilized by the youngsters.
 
Re: Minnesota Girls High School Hockey III

Thanks for the information everyone. I'm glad to see that CFB, hits to the head, boarding will all be subject to harsher penalties. There's really no place in the game for any of that stuff. I find myself still shaking my head that the high school league had softer penalties for that stuff than was the case in college. What was it? A few years ago in a FF contest that UMD's Holmlov got the game misconduct in a game against Bucky??

Anyway . . . thanks again for the clarifications about the rules.
 
Re: Minnesota Girls High School Hockey III

I think it was the 2009 semifinals. Even Jessie Vetter said it wasn't checking from behind. I don't know too many people who saw it who agreed with the call. Ended up costing the Bulldogs the game.
 
Re: Minnesota Girls High School Hockey III

I think it was the 2009 semifinals. Even Jessie Vetter said it wasn't checking from behind. I don't know too many people who saw it who agreed with the call. Ended up costing the Bulldogs the game.

Yea, well . . . water over the dam. My point was that even questionable/borderline CFB calls in college garnered a harsh penalty.
 
Re: Minnesota Girls High School Hockey III

Thanks for the information everyone. I'm glad to see that CFB, hits to the head, boarding will all be subject to harsher penalties. There's really no place in the game for any of that stuff. I find myself still shaking my head that the high school league had softer penalties for that stuff than was the case in college.
Possibly due to the rarity of injuries of this magnitude, particularly for the girls...up to this point anyway. The girls high school game has definitely evolved in the time since first becoming a varsity sport. Initially for the first few years the physical aspect of play was nothing like what it is now. Much greater skill on a much more widespread basis today than there was back in the early years of varsity. A pretty large number of participants today are intent on playing college hockey, intensely focused on acquiring $$ to play while getting an education...or simply landing a spot on a college hockey roster. Players are bigger, faster and stronger and the physical part of the game has intensified. The competitive nature or spirit in girls high school hockey has, well...compared to the early days I guess you'd have to say skyrocketed. So many train and play year round now...that was pretty much non existent back in the day.

It is very unfortunate and disturbing serious tragedies had to occur before changes were made. I just hope that officials can now make the changes extremely effective. Coaches have to take initiative as well letting their players know those infractions highlighted by the MSHSL are not acceptable. Perhaps a bit of a tricky proposition not wanting to inhibit a players intensity, skills or tools per legal contact, while keeping it clean for those MSHSL areas of new emphasis.
 
Re: Minnesota Girls High School Hockey III

Saw this today . . . isn't checking from behind an AUTOMATIC disqualification in college?? This seems kind of backward . . . ??
http://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/highs...t-paralyzed-falling-164124017.html#more-11188

http://minnesota.cbslocal.com/video-on-demand/?***************&clipId=6617319

Watching this vid I would not call this checking from behind. You can not see all the detail as the net is in the way. Looks more like some simple body contact in passing and she lost her balance. Most interesting is she had a previous incident with a spinal cord type injury and came back from it.

Wish her the best in her recovery.
 
Last edited:
Re: Minnesota Girls High School Hockey III

This is mostly an update on Jack Jablonski and his spinal cord injury, but the article also mentions Jenna Privette and the fact that the two just met for the first time:

Jabs: 'This is like a calling almost'

http://www.mnhockeyhub.com/news_article/show/129709

"Thursday afternoon, 18-year-old hospital patient Jenna Privette, who suffered a spinal injury during a hockey game on Jan. 6, rolled into Jablonski's room, her mother pushing her wheelchair. She delivered a blanket to Jack. It was the first time they had met.

Privette told Jablonski that the blanket threads were woven with prayers, just like a blanket that friends from her school delivered to her. Doctors have said Privette's spinal cord is not severed, and her family is hopeful that she will be able to walk again, as she did after a similar injury in 2008. The two teenagers held their mothers' hands along with Jack's brother, Max, in prayer. The mothers took pictures of their injured children side-by-side.

Before Privette and her mother left, Jenna and Jack agreed to talk again, to discuss an ordeal that few others can truly understand."


Isn't that the truth...
 
Re: Minnesota Girls High School Hockey III

The best video I've seen - makes it hard to dispute that it was in fact a CFB.

Controversy surrounds hit to Jenna Privette

http://www.letsplayhockey.com/compo...troversy-surrounds-hit-to-jenna-privette.html
The LPH article is extremely informative.

And sorry D2D, I am going to adopt the opposite view, I find the video to be extremely inconclusive. One player has the puck behind the net, another comes from in front and disputes possession. Contact? Surely. A check? A little harder to see on that video.

I just hope she is OK.
 
Re: Minnesota Girls High School Hockey III

I agree with MBTC. It might be a CFB or it might not, one can't say for sure because the net and several players are between the camera and the play in question. I watched it about four times, but I can't take any more of Larry the Cable Guy, so that'll do it for me. Obviously, the finding that she fell on her own is nonsense.
 
Re: Minnesota Girls High School Hockey III

Looks like a CFB violation to me. Based on that video, I Think I'd also have to dispute the officials account given to the MSHSL as many who witnessed first hand have done.
 
Re: Minnesota Girls High School Hockey III

Looks like a CFB violation to me. Based on that video, I Think I'd also have to dispute the officials account given to the MSHSL as many who witnessed first hand have done.

I've looked at over and over again; it is very hard to tell. Surprised at your conclusion....well maybe not. Hope the kid is ok. :)
 
Re: Minnesota Girls High School Hockey III

I've looked at over and over again; it is very hard to tell. Surprised at your conclusion....well maybe not. Hope the kid is ok. :)
As utterly obsessed, consumed and respectful I always am with your opinion of my conclusions (well maybe not) it looks like a CFB to me. If it's "very hard to tell" one way or the other, why would any conclusion be surprising? :)
 
Re: Minnesota Girls High School Hockey III

I agree with those who say that the video is not 100% conclusive. However, what makes me believe she was hit from behind is the way she went into the boards with considerable force, and in my view the impact and her immediate motion into the boards is more sudden than her own momentum could have caused. I just don't believe that she could have generated enough momentum on her own to go into the boards head first like that while being basically stationary - her only movement just beforehand was pivoting (turning) towards the end boards, and in the next second you see her crashing pretty much head first while trying to get her arms up to protect herself. It's just inconceivable to me why (and how) anyone would/could do this on their own.

That said, I do NOT think the hit was malicious or intentional on the part of the other girl. A little careless, perhaps, but I do not believe she was trying to injure Miss Privette.
 
Re: Minnesota Girls High School Hockey III

I just don't believe that she could have generated enough momentum on her own to go into the boards head first like that while being basically stationary - her only movement just beforehand was pivoting (turning) towards the end boards, and in the next second you see her crashing pretty much head first while trying to get her arms up to protect herself. It's just inconceivable to me why (and how) anyone would/could do this on their own.
I agree that it was not on her own. I don't think it is accurate to say that she was stationary, as she was skating left to right before that pivot, so she brought more energy to the action than one who is standing still would. What is impossible to tell from the angle is the exact nature of the contact. Is it on the hip, the thigh, the shoulder, the back ... I can't see, only Privette's reaction, so I'm left to assume. I hate to do so in a case as serious as this. It could be a CFB, but I'm not going to call it that, because I believe there is enough uncertainty that it is possible that it was not. It definitely wasn't nearly as clear cut as the CFB on video in the recent Winona and Owatonna boys' game that led to a fight.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top