I enjoyed the Sunday version of the tailgate and it COMPLETELY outranks the website, "fer shurr, eh"?
DC and Hux, I'd be remiss not to thank you again more formally!
Nicely done!
You're most welcome. We had a great time and enjoyed the fine company on both days. Besides, what could be more entertaining than watching a mover and shaker of the auto industry hold court from a lawn chair perched in the back of my truck.
With regard to the brackets, I 2nd "My thoughts exactly!" From what I heard, a lot of complaints from college coaches -- none of the scouts really want to watch the college all-star teams or the lower A teams because there is no one there for them to recruit. And to have them driving back and forth between rinks. They could have one bracket for all non-college players that are truly u19 tier 1 level teams. But some of those teams may have good players but they will get killed if they played against the all-college teams.
I agree with your recommendation regarding a U24 or even Over 20 division. Speaking to some of the girls that have reached their age limit under the present scenario, they were sad that their opportunity to get together with friends, family and others was coming to an end via the Summer Chowder Cup. Any idea on how to promote or organize such a division? I know several girls that would be willing to assist; and they know several more and so on and so on.I agree wholeheartedly with your assessment. At least 1/3 probably more like 40% of the AA teams were overmatched if not overwhelmed. As for good teams playing down in A, not sure what the coaches are thinking. Spend a fair amount of money to cakewalk three pool games. Can't be much fun for the players either. I'd like to see a u-24( College Division, with a low # of teams, 8 maybe), a u20( AA) and a u18 (A)
Here is my proposed divisions for the 2011 Chowder Cup, what do you think?
AAA (22U College Only/19 to 22 yrs old)
1989 Graduating College Seniors
1990 Completed Junior College Year
1991 Completed Sophomore College Year
1992 Completed Freshman College Year
AA (20U College & HS Mix/17 to 20 yrs old)
1991 Completed Sophomore College Year
1992 Completed Freshman College Year
1993 Graduating High School Seniors
1994 Completed 11th Grade High School
A (18U High School Only/15 to 18 yrs old)
1993 Graduating High School Seniors
1994 Completed 11th Grade High School
1995 Completed 10th Grade High School
1996 Completed 9th Grade High School
Agree, but could accomplish by having the Over 20's in a separate rink. Leave the other two younger divisions to either split between the remaining two rinks or assign a rink to each division. Pretty sure the coaches are not interested much in the Over 20's and probably have less interest in the lower A Division. Such an approach would seem to make many happy; although I'm sure will make others less pleased for some reason.I don't know. I think its a good idea to set up a tourney for the older girls if there is ice but I think the biggest complaint I heard from coaches and scouts is that the tourney was too big and too many venues. Most coaches I talked to said they wish that it was a smaller tourney and held at one venue so that they could see more potential recruits. With 4 rinks it was hard for them to get to all of the recruits that they wanted to see and the quality of play produced some games that were blowouts and not good games from which to judge recruits.
Agree, but could accomplish by having the Over 20's in a separate rink. Leave the other two younger divisions to either split between the remaining two rinks or assign a rink to each division. Pretty sure the coaches are not interested much in the Over 20's and probably have less interest in the lower A Division. Such an approach would seem to make many happy; although I'm sure will make others less pleased for some reason.
I'd almost go the other way and open the tournament up to any and all who can pay the fee. Less brackets and structure, not more. Just think how much fun it would be to see your "run what ya brung" U16/U19 mish mash team play against the current or past National teams. What an experience for the youngsters, eh? Let's make it a more open "Wild West" kind of event. After all, this is summer hockey. The scouts really don't need another excuse to vacation in the Boston area and pad their expense accounts.
I'd almost go the other way and open the tournament up to any and all who can pay the fee. Less brackets and structure, not more. Just think how much fun it would be to see your "run what ya brung" U16/U19 mish mash team play against the current or past National teams. What an experience for the youngsters, eh? Let's make it a more open "Wild West" kind of event. After all, this is summer hockey. The scouts really don't need another excuse to vacation in the Boston area and pad their expense accounts.
I agree wholeheartedly with your assessment. At least 1/3 probably more like 40% of the AA teams were overmatched if not overwhelmed. As for good teams playing down in A, not sure what the coaches are thinking. Spend a fair amount of money to cakewalk three pool games. Can't be much fun for the players either. I'd like to see a u-24( College Division, with a low # of teams, 8 maybe), a u20( AA) and a u18 (A)
The coaches are thinking they don't want to play in AA and get crushed 3 games either (after paying all that money to get there!) There is clearly a middle talent pool, some teams with a mix of D-1 and D-3 talent that are too good for A but not really good enough for the college player filled AA teams. They are the teams that ultimately advanced to the qrtrs where the good games in the A bracket actually began. But, you had a team with a handful of u18 National team members that didn't even make it to the semis. And, the Pittsburgh team made it to the semis with a group of girls, most of which are future D-3 at best.
Curious -- for those have been there before -- is this an ongoing discussion year after year where nothing really changes
What happened to the Chowder Cup website?.