What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

Michigan Tech, best season in 30 years, part two!

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: Michigan Tech, best season in 30 years, part two!

Maybe I'm all wet, but it seem like as a player, you get into a rhythm of play and get used to about how long you have to get rid of the puck. When the time gets cut down you struggle to do it faster, and you make bad passes. I'm guessing that's what happened with us. Not only are passes more difficult to make due to pressure, but the guys you would normally pass to are covered and the process of deciding what to do next takes time you don't have.

Thus the dump out.

I'm wondering from people who were there,... if we were getting to loose pucks first, or if we were just not quick enough. Because of course quickness and speed are not the same. We scored when we could use our speed, which wasn't all that often.
It also looked like, even though we won our share of face-offs, we still lost possession due to the quick pressure being applied.
 
Re: Michigan Tech, best season in 30 years, part two!

I don't think it's any secret that the memo on Tech all year has been to forecheck aggressively and force the play. That is how Mankato swept them in Houghton, and how Michigan edged them at the GLI after getting kitty-raped at the MacInnes two months prior. Other teams have done it as well, but haven't had the talent to capitalize on the turnovers. Mankato absolutely does.

I think if we had gone into this series after playing Bemidji real close, we would've looked better. Instead, the Huskies had the chance to get overconfident by blowing out a bad UAA team, then had a weekend "off". I figured things were not promising when Mel indicated last week that he thought we were too excited. There's a difference between good energy and bad energy.

Hopefully, this series brings them back to earth a bit after that 8-0 run and gets them focused on NMU.
 
Re: Michigan Tech, best season in 30 years, part two!

I said it after getting swept by mankato in November...all they have to do is end the season the way the started and everything in the middle won't matter. That starts with the next game 10-0 to end the season makes us national champs!
 
Re: Michigan Tech, best season in 30 years, part two!

Minnesota got to skate with the Cup the night they clinched a share of the title in Bemidji because they still had possession of the trophy from the previous year after the WCHA never bothered to get it back. St. Cloud had to wait until the next weekend's playoffs even though they held the tiebreaker over Minnesota and were top seed in the playoffs. It seems like the league office has their stuff a little more together these days.



Just minor heat-of-the-moment stuff. Mel came over to apologize to Hastings after the game but it was all water under the bridge by that point.

We were defending champs, therefore we had the right to skate with the trophy first. SCSU fans don't like that fact, but that's the breaks. :)
 
Re: Michigan Tech, best season in 30 years, part two!

Huge games this weekend. We may not control the league race any more, but a sweep against NMU actually means a realistic chance of a top 4 pairwise ranking depending on how the NCHC series come out. I did my best guess at the NCHC games and got a top 4 with a sweep of NMU, 7th with a split and 8th with an egg.
 
Re: Michigan Tech, best season in 30 years, part two!

Huge games this weekend. We may not control the league race any more, but a sweep against NMU actually means a realistic chance of a top 4 pairwise ranking depending on how the NCHC series come out. I did my best guess at the NCHC games and got a top 4 with a sweep of NMU, 7th with a split and 8th with an egg.

Sounds about right, I don't think we'll end up with a #1 without winning out til NCAAs. Beyond that, the goal is to stay above 7 in pwr to avoid MSU and UND in regionals.
 
Sounds about right, I don't think we'll end up with a #1 without winning out til NCAAs. Beyond that, the goal is to stay above 7 in pwr to avoid MSU and UND in regionals.

I think we may get a number 1 if we win through to the WCHA championship game and lose there. Things have to fall right though, lots of losses by Miami, UNO and DU.
 
Re: Michigan Tech, best season in 30 years, part two!

It is laughable just how desperate the pollsters are to keep moving BU up every chance they get. Last week BU gets a win, squeaks out an OT win and then loses (all three games vs unranked Northeastern)... yep, move them up in the polls. Just in the last two weeks they have lost to UNH, Notre Dame and Northeastern - all unranked teams.

I hope they get a #1 seed just to see them lose to a #12 or #13 in the first round of the tourney so "Steve Urkel" can go sign his pro contract and we can stop hearing about how great BU is/was...

Enough already,
Ryan J
 
Re: Michigan Tech, best season in 30 years, part two!

It is laughable just how desperate the pollsters are to keep moving BU up every chance they get. Last week BU gets a win, squeaks out an OT win and then loses (all three games vs unranked Northeastern)... yep, move them up in the polls. Just in the last two weeks they have lost to UNH, Notre Dame and Northeastern - all unranked teams.

I hope they get a #1 seed just to see them lose to a #12 or #13 in the first round of the tourney so "Steve Urkel" can go sign his pro contract and we can stop hearing about how great BU is/was...

Enough already,
Ryan J


BU is a good team and Eichel is one of the best players in college hockey.
 
Re: Michigan Tech, best season in 30 years, part two!

BU is a good team and Eichel is one of the best players in college hockey.

Agreed. They are as talented a team as there is.

I have us a 1 seed if we get to the WCHA title game.

Once you get in, it really doesn't matter all that much. I mean you'd prefer to play Minnesota?. They can really fly, have good defensemen and good goaltending, How about BC, ...same, Omaha, Duluth, Miami, Michigan, it's all the same pretty much throughout. You just have to be ready with your top game. The only game that is a bit of a stretch might be the 16 seed team vs the 1 seed. Everything else is very tough.

BTW, MacMillan is out for UND, 6 to 8 weeks looks like. Arguably their best player.
 
Last edited:
Re: Michigan Tech, best season in 30 years, part two!

BU is a good team and Eichel is one of the best players in college hockey.
I don't disagree with your statement at all. However being a "good" team and being ranked in the top 5 like the pollsters keep trying to make them, are completely different. Most of the teams in the top 20 are "good" teams.

As for Eichel, yes he has 55 pts on the season which looks like a ton, until you see where get got them. He has 16 pts in four games against WI (not real good), U-Mass (last in HE) and Merrimack (2nd to last in HE). Take out those four games and suddenly he's at 39 pts and not even in the top 10 for scoring.

I would much rather face BU in the tourney than Mankato or UND who play a fast, physical game which seems to give Tech problems. Heck, I would be more worried about Alaska if they were in the tourney than BU.

Ryan J
 
Re: Michigan Tech, best season in 30 years, part two!

Mel P show summary. I would guess Eick is in this weekend.

Interesting to listen to Mel's knowledge and sequence of plays that led to the 1-1 tieing goal Saturday. And how they had prepared the guys to avoid what Mankato was trying to do with their forecheck and then ensuing play off the faceoff after our icing.

Mel Pearson Show summary for 3-2:
Disappointing weekend, wanted a better position today, but it's still nice to be in conversation to have a chance at MacNaughton Cup
We want to be in that conversation every year going into the last weekend
Where this program has come in 4 years, incredible to watch, Seniors have done a fabulous job
Mankato - see our team in them in a lot of ways, goalie, GF, GA, very even, we match up well, 4 goals have seperated 4 games, they made key plays to get the Ws
We had our opportunities, Sturos, late 2x1, in OT, L'Esperance had a chance, they have our number right now, but we can play better, a lot of guys struggled this weekend
But a lot is Mankato, they played in front of record crowd, they fed off that, they got a few goals from the point, we couldn't get the puck through them
Like our team, battled to the end both games
3rd period Friday, we took a penalty, on our heels the rest of the game, they outaattmepted us by 20 shots
1st period Sat was not good, they jumped us, a fine line, thye had that step on us

On Friday:
0-1, we had a breakdown, chased the puck a bit too much, pretty even period
1-1 - Sturos big goal, showed great speed up the side, great shot, Williams off his angle a bit, Reid had a strong weekend, he'll be a key guy going forward
Jamie stood on his head in 3rd, his best game of the year, sometimes the more work he gets, the better he can be, but we want to limit shots
They had 2 PPs in 3rd, gave Mankato momentum
Jamie gave us a chance to win, Gould with a post in 3rd
Our Dmen got beat 1x1, when Mankato got some breaks in on Jamie, got caught watching the puck a bit
Jamie gave us opportunity to come back Saturday with chance to walk out in 1st place
Out-attempted them 5-2 in OT
Congrats to Jamie, finalist for Mike Richter, new award for best goalie in country along with other criteria, student, community involvement etc He has opportunity to win that.

On Saturday:
Made some adjustments, thought we'd bounce back and play better
We did decrease the # of scoring opportunities they had. We were a little flat 1st period.
Can't be intimidated by the crowd, but they came out and jumped us pretty good. After 1st 10 mins we settled down.
1-0 Johnstone, as he gets more games, he'll only get better, want him in a position to be real productive
We missed Eick's speed in a series like that
Our 1st lead, it was short lived, we have to play better after we scored, next few shifts have to be good
1-1, Molinari, from the point
Didn't like this sequence, we score, win faceoff, then we go Dman to Dman, when you do that, the D has to move with the puck against their forecheck but we stood there and let them forecheck, and we ice the puck
Didn't move our feet, no one open, hail mary pass is icing, and sure enough off a faceoff play, the guy on the board could shoot it, but then our D didn't pick up guys in front of net, combination of mistakes
every play matters, the faceoff after the Tech goal led to the Mankato goal, Mel really hot after that - had gone over both things (D to D) and the Mankato faceoff play for their goal, didn't execute
We have a number of neutral zone plays we can make, just poor execution, can't give good teams opportunities like that
1-2, goal with 5 seconds in period, 2x2 in the corner and they won the battles, threw it to the point, had guys that could've blocked it, seeing eye wrist shot
2-2, Leibinger out of the penalty box out of Neville, we carried play, attempts even, most of their shots from perimeter
Kero missed a tap-in, unlike him, sums up weekend, guys had trouble handling puck at times, not sure nerves, mentally off etc, a lot of guys fought it
2-3, GWG, we have to block that shot from the point, they did a real good job blocking shots, we'll work on that this week
2-4 PPG, broken play off PK, Leitner knew were Gervais would be, it was a quick play, tough to give up
Mankato changed forecheck and shut things down, went into a 1-2-2, even period until that PPG, for the most part, even hockey games, their best players made a few plays to separate them
Mankato 3 point lead in WCHA, too bad, our guys played hard, wanted to do well, they never give up, told the team that's as good of a team as you'll see in the country, we don't walk out of there feeling like we had no chance, could've beat that team, our guys upset, have a feeling we might meet them again

They discussed other WCHA games.
Told our team it's out of hands now, but we saw Bemidji, they're playing as well as anyone right now, MSU/BSU will be a good series, we have to take care of business

On NMU:
Nexteer sponsor for Friday, remote at Noon from the MUB on Wed, Tshirt giveaway for Friday
Senior night after the game, would be great to have a record crowd for our seniors, they deserve a great sendoff
Big important game, we haven't talked much about NCAA, but the next few weekends make/break where we end up if we have opportunity to play in the tourney


Questions for Mel:

What special preparations will Tech have before this weekend.
Changes to lineup, tweak a couple things. Get Eick in, could've made trip , wanted to give him extra week though.
PP didn't get much work in game, spend extra time on that. Work on forecheck, didn't get to get after them that much. Need to work harder without the puck.

Other than Jamie, any player that played exceptionally well?
Sturos played hard and had a good game.
Johnstone was good.
Pietila, helped win faceoff battle and had jump.
We had guys that tried, but success was limited mostly due to Mankato.

Emailed noted Tech's best players haven't been effective against MSU or BGSU in the playoffs last year.
Part is on the road, they have last change. There are matchups they wanted. We tried to shuffle it up to get guys away from player.
Mankato had a Dpair they wanted against Kero's line.
Part is we are in a learning process, Mankato has been in NCAA recently. It's different, preparation, mentality you need. Even at MI, took baby steps, missed tourney, then lost in 1st round etc.
Really like this group, all these pressure situations are good for you. Good wake up call for us. Disappointed, but have to take something away, from it.

Did Mankato do anything special to our top scorers?
They had mathcups they wanted. Took our time/space away, against everyone. Effective forecheck.
We didn't get many PPs either. Sometimes your top players can perform with more space on PPs.

Down at Mankato about 7 former of Mel's Edina classmates were at the games.
Mel's happy to welcome back Darcy Way, to the Tech family. He'll do a great job fundraising and helping all the spots.

Dirk noted about the MN High School hockey tourney. We got to see a few games last week. We're dealing with some recruits there. Joe amazed at the crowd for a regional game. Mel's good friend is the coach of Edina, they have a good team again.
Would love to go to it, but with our schedule it falls during a bad time.
Fortunate to get Steman out of MN. He's established himself as a good player. So many players in MN, some can get overlooked or late bloomers. We'll keep our hands in the mix in MN.

Giant game this weekend. Have to do all the little things to win. We have to block shots, kill penalties, get PP opportunities. Create offense. 3rd offensively, 2nd team defense. 1st scoring margin. A lot of good things.
Told this team we know how to win. 24 wins tied with Mankato and UND.
They'll be ready Friday night. Come to the union on Wed even if you're not a student, grab a bite to eat.
Will watch some of NMU's recent games, but it's all about us. We have to prepare and be ready to play our game. We didn't do that this weekend.
 
Re: Michigan Tech, best season in 30 years, part two!

I don't disagree with your statement at all. However being a "good" team and being ranked in the top 5 like the pollsters keep trying to make them, are completely different. Most of the teams in the top 20 are "good" teams.

As for Eichel, yes he has 55 pts on the season which looks like a ton, until you see where get got them. He has 16 pts in four games against WI (not real good), U-Mass (last in HE) and Merrimack (2nd to last in HE). Take out those four games and suddenly he's at 39 pts and not even in the top 10 for scoring.

I would much rather face BU in the tourney than Mankato or UND who play a fast, physical game which seems to give Tech problems. Heck, I would be more worried about Alaska if they were in the tourney than BU.

Ryan J


They're ranked 6 in the Pairwise. I don't care who Tech plays in the tourney. It's anyone's game at that point.
 
Re: Michigan Tech, best season in 30 years, part two!

No, there are 4 games against "MSU". But two of them are in East Lansing :D

Haha. That's what I thought. I know I read it somewhere but I couldn't find it. Our group really enjoyed Mankato and will be going each year we play there, I thought next year was a year we didn't though.
 
Re: Michigan Tech, best season in 30 years, part two!

The Cowbell Guy and Pub 500 are giving away gift cards to fans that were in Mankato last weekend. Just have to go say hello on his facebook page.

Edit. I mentioned we won't be back next year to him :)
 
Last edited:
Re: Michigan Tech, best season in 30 years, part two!

Speak of the devil, Michigan Tech just got a commitment from Keegan Ford who currently plays for the USHL Dubuque Fighting Saints...the overstated USHL drought is over.

Ford left Wisconsin in December after starting his freshman season there this October...can't blame him for getting out of that *@#$ Show
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top