What's new
By:
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

Michigan Tech 2018-19: Who Cares What They Name It, We Want It

Re: Michigan Tech 2018-19: Who Cares What They Name It, We Want It

rustedblades said:
Good point, not sure how you gauge that one. I just remember the growth of Sturos from his Junior to Senior year; thinking how great is would be if everyone could make that kind of progression during there time at Tech. There were a couple others Vallis, Malcolm Gould, etc. that really came on at the end.

We did see some improvement in a few of the guys down the stretch last year but they had kind of lack luster regular season play. Specifically Lesperance, Auk, Birks, Gilles.

Maybe our upperclassmen will seize the moment in the upcoming playoff run similar to what the guys did last year. Only time will tell.

Go Huskies!
Click to expand...

For now, I think you can blame that on the change in style. Getting as defensive as they have will sacrifice some offense. While I don't think the defensive players were as good as last year, the overall team defense was better and the goaltending seemed to find its grove near at times which was nice. I think a group of Jurusik, Beydoun, and probably Pietila should be spectacular next year.

Hopefully Buckley turns a corner and can get some playing time next year. I would also expect Shawhan to use Datema and Lipe (incoming defensemen) to go bigger more physical on the blueline on occasion.
 
Re: Michigan Tech 2018-19: Who Cares What They Name It, We Want It

Was dissapointed by the schedule this year, but, as luck would have it, come playoff time I finally get a chance to debut my Gold Shane Hanna WCHA Championship backbreaker replica jersey at BGSU.

And its only a 10 mile drive!
 
Re: Michigan Tech 2018-19: Who Cares What They Name It, We Want It

Shirtless Guy said:
For now, I think you can blame that on the change in style. Getting as defensive as they have will sacrifice some offense. While I don't think the defensive players were as good as last year, the overall team defense was better and the goaltending seemed to find its grove near at times which was nice. I think a group of Jurusik, Beydoun, and probably Pietila should be spectacular next year. Hopefully Buckley turns a corner and can get some playing time next year. I would also expect Shawhan to use Datema and Lipe (incoming defensemen) to go bigger more physical on the blueline on occasion.
Click to expand...

Bigger fine as long as it is NOT a sacrifice in speed or skill. I would still take speed and skill over size. Being a defensive team does not work in college hockey. Playing great defense does.
 
Re: Michigan Tech 2018-19: Who Cares What They Name It, We Want It

Most people tend to think about developing the talent of our players as they move through their years at Tech and focusing on offensive numbers. However an often overlooked aspect is the physical traits of the players as well. Can a team loaded with upperclassmen simply lay the lumber to younger teams and dominate them physically? College hockey is one of those levels where older players should have a significant physical advantage over the younger players. They have 3-4 years to add bulk in addition to increasing their skill set. Just on physical ability the older players should be increasing their production year to year. Three years is a LOT of time in the weight room. Might be a good question for an off-season Joe Show: How does the staff feel the players are developing physically under this group of coaches?
Ryan
 
Re: Michigan Tech 2018-19: Who Cares What They Name It, We Want It

giwan said:
Bigger fine as long as it is NOT a sacrifice in speed or skill. I would still take speed and skill over size. Being a defensive team does not work in college hockey. Playing great defense does.
Click to expand...

In listening to Joe talk about offensive players, he is looking for a mix. It is not hard to extrapolate that for defensemen that he wants a mix as well. He could pick up one or two plus size/strength defenders specifically for use against teams that play physical, on the PK, and to close out games. Think a bigger Polglaze type defenseman. One might sacrifice offensive production, but he fills a much needed roll.
 
Re: Michigan Tech 2018-19: Who Cares What They Name It, We Want It

Lost_Husky said:
In listening to Joe talk about offensive players, he is looking for a mix. It is not hard to extrapolate that for defensemen that he wants a mix as well. He could pick up one or two plus size/strength defenders specifically for use against teams that play physical, on the PK, and to close out games. Think a bigger Polglaze type defenseman. One might sacrifice offensive production, but he fills a much needed roll.
Click to expand...

Brenden Datema should be a great two-way defenseman for those purposes but Chris Lipe is being brought in specifically to get more physical against teams that it fits. One big assumption is a game like at Ferris State where the rink is so small. Along with Cooper Watson, those 2 freshmen would be the only ones over 6'
 
Re: Michigan Tech 2018-19: Who Cares What They Name It, We Want It

I'm not too worried about the recruiting pipeline or development of players just yet, but I am a bit concerned when I hear that we're targeting big/physical again. I get that it's part of the match-up strategy when playing grind teams like Ferris or Bemidji, so I trust that we're targeting guys who fit that mold, but also skate well.
 
Re: Michigan Tech 2018-19: Who Cares What They Name It, We Want It

FadeToBlack&Gold said:
I'm not too worried about the recruiting pipeline or development of players just yet, but I am a bit concerned when I hear that we're targeting big/physical again. I get that it's part of the match-up strategy when playing grind teams like Ferris or Bemidji, so I trust that we're targeting guys who fit that mold, but also skate well.
Click to expand...

From what I understand, Chris Lipe was brought in to allow the team to have a different look defensively when it is warranted, not an every game situation. It's about having the ability to match physicality when we face it.
 
Re: Michigan Tech 2018-19: Who Cares What They Name It, We Want It

Mitch Meek could help this team. He is healthy, but he is buried. Playing Kiilunen over Mitch is a joke IMO. He is arguably top four. Only one reason I can think of, TK is a walk on so if MM leaves there is another scholarship. There is a big group coming in again next year, gotta make room somehow. The players all know who is best and this flies in the face of that. Gotta play your best guys regardless of physicality, size, blah, blah, blah. Tough to keep the boys playing at a high level when you are not giving them the best team.
 
Re: Michigan Tech 2018-19: Who Cares What They Name It, We Want It

Safe travels to anyone making the trip to BG this weekend!
 
Re: Michigan Tech 2018-19: Who Cares What They Name It, We Want It

Here's hoping BG is grabbing their sticks too tight this weekend.

Go Tech!!
 
Re: Michigan Tech 2018-19: Who Cares What They Name It, We Want It

A wise man once said:
"Falcon who can not see, can not put puck in net..."
Beat those Falcons!

<img height=400 src="https://farm8.staticflickr.com/7295/9733381466_a9fd240fc2_b.jpg">
"Hey, who turned out the lights!"
 
Re: Michigan Tech 2018-19: Who Cares What They Name It, We Want It

JohnsonsJerseys said:
A wise man once said:
"Falcon who can not see, can not put puck in net..."
Beat those Falcons!

<img height=400 src="https://farm8.staticflickr.com/7295/9733381466_a9fd240fc2_b.jpg">
"Hey, who turned out the lights!"
Click to expand...
Nor can that falcon stop the puck. Put it on net and meet me at the crease.

Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk
 
Re: Michigan Tech 2018-19: Who Cares What They Name It, We Want It

What a delight to come rushing home turn the game on and find us up 1-0 AND on a power play!!!
 
Checkmate said:
Mitch Meek could help this team. He is healthy, but he is buried. Playing Kiilunen over Mitch is a joke IMO. He is arguably top four. Only one reason I can think of, TK is a walk on so if MM leaves there is another scholarship. There is a big group coming in again next year, gotta make room somehow. The players all know who is best and this flies in the face of that. Gotta play your best guys regardless of physicality, size, blah, blah, blah. Tough to keep the boys playing at a high level when you are not giving them the best team.
Click to expand...

I would think if Meek could help this team he would be in there unless he is one of the guys bucking the system. In that case it could be tough getting back in.
I to thought he was top 4 coming in to this season. Actually forgot all about him. Thought he was hurt?
 
Re: Michigan Tech 2018-19: Who Cares What They Name It, We Want It

oh no! now we have "the most dangerous lead in all of college hockey"!
 
Re: Michigan Tech 2018-19: Who Cares What They Name It, We Want It

I have never seen a larger load of **** than that roughing penalty
 
Re: Michigan Tech 2018-19: Who Cares What They Name It, We Want It

If you ask me and I’m nobody , but our system gives the other team time of possession in our end. It’s not fun to watch either . Our guys sacrificed themselves big time tonight and got nothing for it. Our 5 on 5 defensive zone system might as well be a penalty kill as that’s how we play it .
You have to wonder why we are trying to out BG the BG team.
I’d much rather watch one of Mel’s teams play
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top