No, it isn't. It'll entice more people to go to the game as opposing to sitting on the couch. It's bad enough 3 buses of Merrimack fans are coming up.......
Red Gendron @RedGendron ·14 hrs
MaineFans @MaineIceHockey: 2K Tix lft 4 Sat v Merrimack 7PM@Alfond. Whataya say MAINE ... HowBout CU@Alfond! LET'S MAKE THE OLD GIRL SHAKE!
HA! I misread that as FLA, not LA. I originally posted: "Since you can't build snowmen in FLA, I suppose a straw man will have to do, eh?". Nevertheless, it's still a strawman, and veering off in a totally different direction.
Back to what I actually said, though: I doubt the current TV affiliate would have been thrilled if the university allowed WABI to do this game. Do you disagree?
I'm going to the game so I'm glad its not on tv, it disrupts the flow of the game. Who cares about the wishes of someone who can't provide a service that you want? I have long time customers who I do work for on an everyday basis. If they call me and say I need this done and I say I can't for what ever reason, guess what, I don't expect them to not get that work done. I expect them to do what best for them. They asked me first and I said no(it doesn't matter why I said no, only that I said no). I expect that they will find someone who can provide the service.I understand that. However, they are respecting the wishes of its broadcast partner by not granting WABI the ability to carry the game. Agree or not, the university is displaying integrity.
Honoring the contract with their current provider and not doing a one-off with WABI is the right move.
I disagree to the point where I do not care whether they are thrilled or not. As I said, Maine is shooting itself in the foot out of honor and Learfield is "happy". That is not a partnership. There was a contract for televising 7 games and that is all.
If learfield wanted more, it should have asked for more and paid more. Do you not agree?
and I do not think you know what a strawman argument is.
Learfield is strickly about cash. They are going to make a decision 2 years from now that is in their best business interest and they will not "throw in an extra 10% percent because Creech was good to us and acted honorably". Don't fool yourself and think otherwise. Follow the money.
The ticket website is proving to be unreliable this week. Last night only 13 lower bowl chair backs remained, today that number is up to 125. Lower bowl bleacher seats have sold, down from 174 to 62. No one wants to sit in the balcony it seems, as 101 of the 168 seats in EE and FF remain available. The players have taken to twitter to ask people to buy tickets.
I think they might have done more than that. Is Shore not coming back next year?
I think they might have done more than that. Is Shore not coming back next year?
Maybe next time the contract comes up the university can take into account the inflexible nature of its current broadcast partner. In the meantime they are respecting the deal they already have. What a terrible lesson to teach students.
Back to what I actually said, though: I doubt the current TV affiliate would have been thrilled if the university allowed WABI to do this game. Do you disagree?
What kind of a media broadcast company can't get its chit together in a week to be able to broadcast a live sporting event? As you say,. next time the deal comes up for renewal, perhaps they should consider the limitations and inability to get things done that their current partner seems to have.
One that thinks running re runs of Big Bang Theory are more important
And still running Dunkin Donuts Christmas commercials in February?
Who the hell's their traffic controller, anyway?
George Hale's mom.![]()
One that thinks running re runs of Big Bang Theory are more important
One that thinks running re runs of Big Bang Theory are more important