I heard a rumor that they had done this. And then I saw the article confirming it. I'm shocked to say the least. I could see one year, but four??? As a regular season ticket holder since 1986, I couldn't be more disappointed in this decision.
From what I've heard, it's more for recruiting purposes than anything else - a lot easier to get kids if they think the coach will be here. But this also means that there is likely no severance package outside of paying him for the current year, not the rest of the contract.
If this is the case, I think Whitten is on a pretty short leash, and could easily turn into a one-year extension
Until if and when we know specifically what his contract says, what's the point in speculating about it?
My guess is the university likes Whitten and he will be around another 4 years and giving him a 4 year extension was not some kind of a trick to get players to come . Sounds like a conspiracy theory being developed by people who love a good conspiracy .
My guess is the university likes Whitten and he will be around another 4 years and giving him a 4 year extension was not some kind of a trick to get players to come . Sounds like a conspiracy theory being developed by people who love a good conspiracy .
I can understand that if the contract was written with some performance standards (some of them time based), which if they aren't met would allow the school to cut it short without ramifications. I just hate to see a lot of speculation about it unless we know for sure what is in the contract.Ya'll are misconstruing what I'm trying to say.
Let's face it, if Whitten can turn the team around, I'm sure none of us would mind if he was here for another 4 years, administration included, but it has to be based on performance and reviews from his peers and players. Plus, assuming the school can cut the contract short without a long-term ramifications, i.e a big buyout, then kudos to the school.
I personally trust the source I heard it from, but we will have to wait and see if someone's going to request a copy of the contract.
Ya'll are misconstruing what I'm trying to say.
Let's face it, if Whitten can turn the team around, I'm sure none of us would mind if he was here for another 4 years, administration included, but it has to be based on performance and reviews from his peers and players. Plus, assuming the school can cut the contract short without a long-term ramifications, i.e a big buyout, then kudos to the school.
I personally trust the source I heard it from, but we will have to wait and see if someone's going to request a copy of the contract.
Whitten has another four years to turn things around and he is not going anywhere . Let us hope the recruits keep getting better and let us hope the coaching staff examines their methods that they have been using to make this a better team .
The bottom line is we just don't know if it is a lack of talent on the team or a lack of coaching that is needed to get players to the next level .
i'm not a coach but I doubt any coach can teach those attributes so maybe it's not a coaching problem?We do need more team speed, both at forward and on defense, but especially on defense. We also need more guys that can finish on offense, and more guys with better hands and stick skills.
i'm not a coach but I doubt any coach can teach those attributes so maybe it's not a coaching problem?
I think he meant a coach bring them kind of players in. The skill level of the team dropped off drastically with the early departures and transfer this season. Some other players did not bring their scoring touch from juniors that didn't help alleviate some of early loss as well.