LSSULaker889294
Registered User
Why doesn't the WCHA do a best of 3 in the shootout like the NHL does?
Why doesn't the WCHA do a best of 3 in the shootout like the NHL does?
Maybe the Lakers should reschedule the rest of their home games this season from Fri-Sat nights to Thu-Fri nights.
With some help from Alaska, at least we gained a point on Bemidji in the standings.
I thought they were wanting to shorten the game time,not expand it . With the two overtimes and a shootout , they have added almost another period to the games.
I've never had an issue with regular season ties. Personally, I'd prefer to see them do away with shootouts and the 3 on 3 OT. Have all regular season games worth 2 points and if it ends in a tie, each team gets their point. I wouldn't even mind if they did away with the first 5 on 5 OT. I doubt it will ever go back that way. Too much of a perception that every game must have a winner in some form or fashion.
I've never had an issue with regular season ties. Personally, I'd prefer to see them do away with shootouts and the 3 on 3 OT. Have all regular season games worth 2 points and if it ends in a tie, each team gets their point. I wouldn't even mind if they did away with the first 5 on 5 OT. I doubt it will ever go back that way. Too much of a perception that every game must have a winner in some form or fashion.
I've never had an issue with regular season ties. Personally, I'd prefer to see them do away with shootouts and the 3 on 3 OT. Have all regular season games worth 2 points and if it ends in a tie, each team gets their point. I wouldn't even mind if they did away with the first 5 on 5 OT. I doubt it will ever go back that way. Too much of a perception that every game must have a winner in some form or fashion.
I believe one 5 on 5 overtime is sufficient. Sure the 3 on 3 and sudden death shootout bring a degree of excitement to the game, but I would hesitate to call either of them real hockey. They feel like a gimmick to me, like outdoor games.
Not a fan of shootouts, and have no problem with ties, but I can't figure out why college hockey counts a 5 on 5 overtime loss the same as a regulation loss. It's a 60 minute game. As long as you're OK with ties after 65 minutes, why not be OK with ties after 60 minutes? If you want to play an overtime, at least give the loser of that overtime some credit, the same as you do now with 65 minute ties that go to shootout.
Anyway, just stopping in to see if there's any chatter about the big series this weekend. Good luck, and let's see some exciting hockey!
The Lakers have played better on the road this season than at home so it should be a good series. I think the key for them is to not let the Mavs jump out to leads of more than a goal. If they can play tough and keep the games close, the Lakers have a shot at some points, especially if they can score first. They also need to stay out of the box; that has been a problem for them at times this season.
I believe the Lakers have never won in Mankato during the regular season. They won a playoff game there a few years ago but have lost every regular season game.
Gordy Defiel, 57 save shutout. Remember it well, unfortunately. Great goalie performance, but also one of those games where you end up shouting, "Stop shooting it at his logo! I'll take a missed net over more of the same!"
Bill Crawford extremely critical of the officiating tonight.
Not a fan of shootouts, and have no problem with ties, but I can't figure out why college hockey counts a 5 on 5 overtime loss the same as a regulation loss. It's a 60 minute game. As long as you're OK with ties after 65 minutes, why not be OK with ties after 60 minutes? If you want to play an overtime, at least give the loser of that overtime some credit, the same as you do now with 65 minute ties that go to shootout.
Anyway, just stopping in to see if there's any chatter about the big series this weekend. Good luck, and let's see some exciting hockey!
I believe one 5 on 5 overtime is sufficient. Sure the 3 on 3 and sudden death shootout bring a degree of excitement to the game, but I would hesitate to call either of them real hockey. They feel like a gimmick to me, like outdoor games.