Re: LSSU Lakers 2015 off-season thread
Borek inherited a team that still had pretty good talent. The general W-L trend while he was Laker coach was heading in the wrong direction. Yes he is regarded as a good recruiter and assistant coach, but he wasn't able to prove himself as a Div 1 head coach. The team had become very undisciplined by the time he was fired. His niche is probably as a top assistant and that's where it makes sense for him to be. When Frank was hired the second time, the team talent was pretty well depleted and it was pretty much a given that there were going to be some tough seasons ahead for the Lakers. Frank can coach. He did reinstall better discipline but we all know things didn't work out for other reasons. Roque also had a good reputation as a good recruiter and assistant coach but he too didn't prove himself as a Div 1 head coach and was given far more than enough time to try and show otherwise. If he were to return to college hockey, his niche is also probably as an assistant coach. Including Whitten in your discussion after only one season as head coach, and his first true recruiting class not even coming in until this Fall, makes no sense.
...and Frank left his behind the second time...and Roque left his behind...and Whitten had a Frank 2.0 like first season...Borek actually had a winning record two of his five seasons. But just like any other time in the Soo...fire the coach and it will get better. Except they've fired three, and it hasn't gotten any better. Four coaches. 19 years. The more it changes. The more it stays the same. Maybe it's more than just the name on the door of the coach's office. Hmmmmmm.....
Borek inherited a team that still had pretty good talent. The general W-L trend while he was Laker coach was heading in the wrong direction. Yes he is regarded as a good recruiter and assistant coach, but he wasn't able to prove himself as a Div 1 head coach. The team had become very undisciplined by the time he was fired. His niche is probably as a top assistant and that's where it makes sense for him to be. When Frank was hired the second time, the team talent was pretty well depleted and it was pretty much a given that there were going to be some tough seasons ahead for the Lakers. Frank can coach. He did reinstall better discipline but we all know things didn't work out for other reasons. Roque also had a good reputation as a good recruiter and assistant coach but he too didn't prove himself as a Div 1 head coach and was given far more than enough time to try and show otherwise. If he were to return to college hockey, his niche is also probably as an assistant coach. Including Whitten in your discussion after only one season as head coach, and his first true recruiting class not even coming in until this Fall, makes no sense.